RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners, Receivers and Related Equipment Forums > Uniden Forums > Uniden Tech Support

Uniden Tech Support - For discussion of all technical aspects of current or future Uniden scanners.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2017, 4:17 PM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 246
Default Rolling back firmware

Greetings. I have 1 396XT which previously had Firmware 1.08.14 and I updated to 1.11.01. Now it will not track VA State STARS system worth a damn. It takes longer to capture a control channel, will bounce around from "NFM" to a totally different CC, Back to NFM then back to the original CC. While on a control channel, I have a PRO 197 programmed to the same system. The PRO 197 has the telescoping whip set at 15" and the 396XT has a tuned 2M ham duck, so they are on a similar footing antenna wise. The PRO 197 will be having traffic while the Uniden, in the same part of the house, will show a control channel but no traffic. I am now missing > 2/3 of the radio traffic which was not the case before the update. Since it worked fine before the update and now won't, I have to assume it was something with the update. How can I roll it back to 1.08.14 as it is pretty much worthless now for the STARS. Thanks in advance.

Eugene KG4AVE
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2017, 5:10 AM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 246
Default rolling back firmware

I should also probably explain the STARS is a VHF multisite trunked system for the state of VA. Tracking it can be problematic but not like this.

Eugene KG4AVE
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2017, 10:08 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: middletown, pa.
Posts: 103
Default

swap antennas and see what happens, i think the rubber duck is killing the signal considerably.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2017, 10:23 AM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 246
Default

Thanks for the reply......actually have tried that. Have used a tuned 2 meter ham, a RS 800 antenna which works well with VHF, another RS antenna, long and thick at the top....don't remember which one it is, and a Watson super Gainer. Before the update it was pretty much working well on any antenna I tried. Also, when it does capture and hold a control channel, I get 4-5 bars but it is not decoding the data stream as my other scanner is picking up transmission and the Uniden is not while holding the control channel.

Eugene KG4AVE
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2017, 6:41 PM
Badboy536's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 68
Default

I have Noticed that the firmware 1.10.00. Is the best firmware for my area.
Its The best at decoding with The most consistent and with lowerest error rates.
I used the latest firmware for a while it was sometimes Unusable.i put 1.10.00
Back on no problems ever since.and I have 2 396xt both with the same results.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2017, 8:50 AM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 246
Default

Badboy536- Thanks. Did that and did not seem to make a difference. Need to go back 1 more to 1.08.14 which is the last version which worked. As you don't get that as as a choice with the Uniden updater for the 396XT it may not be possible but I was hoping there was a way to access earlier updates somehow.

Eugene KG4AVE
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2017, 9:10 AM
eorange's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,003
Default

See UPMan's post and read it carefully. I agree 1.11.01 made things worse.

https://forums.radioreference.com/un...-versions.html
__________________
√-1 2 π
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2017, 4:13 PM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 246
Default

eorange: Glad to know I'm not the only one. I see UPman stated you could not apply this with the latest BC_VUP updater. I guess now the question is, were you able to get a an earlier version than the v3 BC_VUP3 (BC_VUP_v3_03_00.zip) as this seem to be the only choice given? Thanks for your help.

Eugene KG4AVE
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2017, 8:10 PM
eorange's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,003
Default

PM sent.
__________________
√-1 2 π
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2017, 8:46 PM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 246
Default

Got it, thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Today, 1:09 PM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 246
Default

eorqnge: Sent PM...thanks.

Eugene KG4AVE
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions