RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > U.S. Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Utah Radio Discussion Forum

Utah Radio Discussion Forum - Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Utah.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2009, 9:56 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bountiful, UT
Posts: 884
Default CAP Civil Air Patrol

Heard a net this evening. Civil Air Partol Utah Wing Yellow Alert Net. It was on 148.1500, PL 118.8.
Anyone have any other confirmed freqs and/or transmitter locations?
__________________
I read it on Youtube.com, so it must be true. Dave Bradshaw
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2009, 1:55 AM
kd7rto's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bountiful, Ut
Posts: 472
Default

I don't have much information on CAP and MARS, but here's what I've got:

143.4125 (input unknown) 74.4 203.5 Army MARS Francis Pk.
143.9875 148.65in (141.3) 74.4 Army MARS
148.0125 Army MARS packet
148.15 143.9in 103.5 CAP Kesler Pk (north of Farnsworth)
__________________
"Happiness is a band opening" -Betty Boop

Last edited by kd7rto; 12-02-2009 at 1:58 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2009, 4:55 AM
Wiki Admin Emeritus
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bowie, Md.
Posts: 20,367
Default

If you have validated information on CAP in Utah, please consider adding it to the database (bring up the state and use the 'submit info' link under the Scanner Master logo). If it's working knowledge that needs validation, it belongs in the wiki. Below is the link for the wiki article (in blue)

Civil Air Patrol - The RadioReference Wiki

If you have trouble knowing how to update this, contact me directly 73 Mike
__________________
links editor, Utility Monitoring Central
HF Forum moderator, RadioReference
Friends don't let friends buy Scancat Lite Plus!

Last edited by ka3jjz; 12-02-2009 at 4:58 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2009, 6:26 AM
ecps92's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 8,931
Default

Thanks, Mike.

I was gonna point out the WIKI. I had been in-contact with the OP via PM and we were going to give it a few days, to see if we could ID the location before moving it to the WIKI.

But a great reminder, to also [once confirmed/validated] to pass it along to get these into the RRDB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ka3jjz View Post
If you have validated information on CAP in Utah, please consider adding it to the database (bring up the state and use the 'submit info' link under the Scanner Master logo). If it's working knowledge that needs validation, it belongs in the wiki. Below is the link for the wiki article (in blue)

Civil Air Patrol - The RadioReference Wiki

If you have trouble knowing how to update this, contact me directly 73 Mike
__________________
Bill N1KUG
Cruise Ship Frequencies
http://www.scanmaritime.com
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2009, 6:33 AM
ecps92's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 8,931
Default

Just an FYI any of the CAP listings that includes 143.900 or 143.7500 as the input as old [Wideband]. CAP moved to Narrowband this year and obtained NEW input frequencies, but kept the same two Rptr Pairs.

148.1250 is the Primary now, it was the Secondary
148.1500 is the Secondary now, it was the Primary.

The WIKI and RRDB have been growing with the NEW information, from confirmed monitorings. However there is stale information out there on the web with the old Wideband listings.

For your MARY inputs, you might want to look into the 138 and 150 band, they also had to move around. Here in New England, the MARS nets are linked and many folks have found the Link freq, thinking it's the Repeater output.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kd7rto View Post
I don't have much information on CAP and MARS, but here's what I've got:

143.4125 (input unknown) 74.4 203.5 Army MARS Francis Pk.
143.9875 148.65in (141.3) 74.4 Army MARS
148.0125 Army MARS packet
148.15 143.9in 103.5 CAP Kesler Pk (north of Farnsworth)
__________________
Bill N1KUG
Cruise Ship Frequencies
http://www.scanmaritime.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2009, 12:44 PM
bneilson's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Jordan, Utah
Posts: 890
Default

Hey guys...

One of our very own here on the forum is VERY involved with CAP. I will see if I can wake the sleeping dog up and get him to dump some info to us....
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2012, 2:28 PM
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego County, California
Posts: 2,099
Arrow

Utah Shakeout Disaster Relief Exercise April 17-19 2012.
UTWG CAP will be participating with many other state and federal agencies in the Utah Shakeout 2012 earthquake exercise on April 17-19, 2012.
http://cap.utah.gov/docs/Utah_Shakeo...e_April_17.pdf
http://cap.utah.gov/

http://www.shakeout.org/utah/

RR Wiki: Civil Air Patrol - Nationwide Database. - Review the Info for 2012.
http://wiki.radioreference.com/index...vil_Air_Patrol
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2012, 4:15 PM
ecps92's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 8,931
Default

Should be a good opportunity to ID some of the missing UT Wing Rptrs

Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnBiker2005 View Post
Utah Shakeout Disaster Relief Exercise April 17-19 2012.
UTWG CAP will be participating with many other state and federal agencies in the Utah Shakeout 2012 earthquake exercise on April 17-19, 2012.
http://cap.utah.gov/docs/Utah_Shakeo...e_April_17.pdf
Utah Wing Civil Air Patrol Home

Utah ShakeOut - Get Ready!

RR Wiki: Civil Air Patrol - Nationwide Database. - Review the Info for 2012.
Civil Air Patrol - The RadioReference Wiki
__________________
Bill N1KUG
Cruise Ship Frequencies
http://www.scanmaritime.com
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2012, 11:41 AM
w7sar's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 28
Default

The role of CAP has "morphed" over the recent years from doing a lot of search and rescue to adding aerial imaging and communications to it's primary operations mission. Utah CAP is ALWAYS looking for top-notch communicators to get involved. Any of you are welcome to check us out and come join. There are a lot of opportunities in the communications area (especially in southern Utah) to serve.

Jerry Wellman, W7SAR
(and Utah CAP commander)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2012, 11:24 AM
ecps92's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 8,931
Default

Sadly too much FOUO, which makes it more fun to chase down the info and share it with our fellow scannists

Quote:
Originally Posted by w7sar View Post
The role of CAP has "morphed" over the recent years from doing a lot of search and rescue to adding aerial imaging and communications to it's primary operations mission. Utah CAP is ALWAYS looking for top-notch communicators to get involved. Any of you are welcome to check us out and come join. There are a lot of opportunities in the communications area (especially in southern Utah) to serve.

Jerry Wellman, W7SAR
(and Utah CAP commander)
__________________
Bill N1KUG
Cruise Ship Frequencies
http://www.scanmaritime.com
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2012, 11:20 AM
w7sar's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 28
Default

FOUO is interesting. One could certainly argue that in most cases the information isn't really earth shattering, etc. But, ponder. Many organizations (CAP included) ask their members to not share some data. It's simply a matter of integrity. As with CAP, some of our customers have asked that CAP demonstrate integrity as part of the mission response. If members will share "little" things, it demonstrates a lack of simple integrity -- or trust. I have some wonderful access that I've earned over years with two police departments. I "could" share a lot of stuff that probably wouldn't damage cases or divulge ongoing investigations. But...I don't, and the departments notice. They've commented and because I keep my mouth shut, the access improves and the trust increases.

Over the years I, like you, have been frustrated that I cannot find scanner freqs, etc. Yet, that's part of the fun to search out and discover. It's been very tough for me not to want to jump in and provide info or correct data, etc. - But I've put my name on the line and told agencies I wouldn't. I would rather have trust than even be an anonymous source. I really can look in the mirror and know that I've been true to what I said I'd do.

I'm very pleased as a CAP official that our customers (most recently the Army) have complimented us on our ability to do our assigned mission and not share details. It's created additional opportunities to serve with other agencies. It's fun to listen...but it "funner" to participate in the mission and actually do something worthwhile. Several years ago several of our members "could" have talked, but they didn't and now several years later, we're still flying the mission, because they demonstrated integrity.

So....Enjoy the hobby. I love to listen too. I just cannot share where I've said I wouldn't.
Jerry W. (W7SAR)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2012, 5:57 PM
kd7rto's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bountiful, Ut
Posts: 472
Default

Jerry, your position is entirely reasonable. To reveal inside information is unethical, period. This is just as applicable in the private sector, what I know of my employer, former employers, and their customers, I keep to myself.

You're doing good things for the community, and there are enough people exploring the local RF spectrum and publicly available records that the information needed to program our receivers is actively being discovered and published, so nobody needs to violate any confidences.
__________________
"Happiness is a band opening" -Betty Boop
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions