RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Washington DC Radio Discussion Forum


Washington DC Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the Washington DC Area

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2008, 07:57 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery County, MD
Posts: 48
Default 996 & Dcfd

I am at a loss and I hope someone here has an "Oh, that's easy" answer, please. As far as I can tell I've programmed DCFD correctly (all frequencies are correct and system is properly designated) but I can pick up almost nothing on this trunked system, even if I'm sitting at Wisconsin and Brandywine in upper Northwest. I keep getting a message saying the radio is searching for the system's control channel. MPD works okay -- not great; I only get about 2.5 bars in the same location, but at least it's working, despite my Microloss 900 coax and a Maxscan1000 trunk-mount -- but DCFD/DCFEMSwhatever just thumbs its nose at my radio. Is there something unique to this system that I missed? Like I say, every other jurisdiction, from Loudon to AA to Balto City seems to behave itself, but this one is driving me batty.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2008, 08:21 PM
Wiki Admin Emeritus
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Glen Burnie, Md.
Posts: 9,783
Default

There are numerous areas in the DC region which are so saturated with RF that a condition known as desense is almost a guarantee. Basically what this means is that the radio is so saturated with signal, it's locking on to some other signal you really don't want, and turning down the sensitivity on others. If everything else checks out (since you get other systems OK, I suspect this is true), that would be my guess. Getting only a couple of bars on the UHF side is additional circumstantial evidence of a desense issue

Don't feel bad - I understand DCFD has the same problem in certain areas...

73 Mike
__________________
links editor, Utility Monitoring Central
HF Forum moderator, RadioReference
Friends don't let friends buy Scancat Lite Plus!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2008, 08:50 PM
Dewey's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 435
Send a message via ICQ to Dewey Send a message via AIM to Dewey Send a message via MSN to Dewey Send a message via Yahoo to Dewey
Default

As Mike said, you might be experiencing desensing. Especially if you're literally sitting at Wisconsin & Brandywine... you should have two VERY LARGE transmitter towers right over your shoulder. Trying hitting the attenuator, or going down the street a couple blocks towards Tenley Circle, and see if that helps. BTW, you didn't say which radio you were using... a Uniden, which is pretty good at rejection, or a GRE (to include the 96/2096), which are so sensitive, they're known to overloaded very easily.

Dewey
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 12:06 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery County, MD
Posts: 48
Default

And here people have told me for years I was desensitized, but I just wouldn't listen. Mike and Dewey, thanks very much. I'll tinker with the attenuator this evening.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 08:28 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery County, MD
Posts: 48
Default

Well...is there a chance it could be something else? I activated the attenuator for DFCD (and for MPD while I was at it) but there was no change. I have a 796 running off the same trunk-mounted antenna, split with a Stridsberg, and the 996 doesn't pick up anywhere near the number of transmissions as the other radio. Now, if I set it to a specific talk group -- fire's 02 Main or MPD 2-D, for example -- the 996 will follow all the transmissions, judging from the 796 I used as a control for this experiment. I assume this means the 996 is trunking properly -- i.e. that it is keeping up with the frequencies as they change from transmission to transmission within a specified TG. But if I hit 'scan' the radio falls almost totally silent. (Which reminds me of another frustration: external speaker volume is miserable compared to my 796s. Grrrrr...)

I went up to Howard County this evening and punched up their system for the first time. It blew me away for the high level of activity I was drawing in. Could this mean I should re-set DCFD and MPD's P25 to 'default' from 'auto'; that maybe the jurisdictions I have been listening to have had too high a threshhold set by the radio?

I have ben listening to scanners since 1980 and I have never been more confused and frustrated by a radio than I am with this 996.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 09:28 PM
Dewey's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 435
Send a message via ICQ to Dewey Send a message via AIM to Dewey Send a message via MSN to Dewey Send a message via Yahoo to Dewey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by allen5565
Well...is there a chance it could be something else? I activated the attenuator for DFCD (and for MPD while I was at it) but there was no change. I have a 796 running off the same trunk-mounted antenna, split with a Stridsberg, and the 996 doesn't pick up anywhere near the number of transmissions as the other radio. Now, if I set it to a specific talk group -- fire's 02 Main or MPD 2-D, for example -- the 996 will follow all the transmissions, judging from the 796 I used as a control for this experiment. I assume this means the 996 is trunking properly -- i.e. that it is keeping up with the frequencies as they change from transmission to transmission within a specified TG. But if I hit 'scan' the radio falls almost totally silent. (Which reminds me of another frustration: external speaker volume is miserable compared to my 796s. Grrrrr...)

I went up to Howard County this evening and punched up their system for the first time. It blew me away for the high level of activity I was drawing in. Could this mean I should re-set DCFD and MPD's P25 to 'default' from 'auto'; that maybe the jurisdictions I have been listening to have had too high a threshhold set by the radio?

I have ben listening to scanners since 1980 and I have never been more confused and frustrated by a radio than I am with this 996.
Sorry to hear that it is still not going well for you. The 996 is really a great radio once you learn it, but for us "old dogs", the new tricks of dynamic memory can be quite intimidating. Since you are going from the bank concept (796) to dynamic memory (996), let me ask one thing. Do you have FD & PD programmed as separate systems? They can share the same System Quick Key (SQK) if you so desire, BUT, they MUST be programmed as separate systems to work correctly. If that's not the problem, I'm sure we'll keep working you until either you or us gets it right.

Dewey
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 09:32 PM
LEH's Avatar
LEH LEH is offline
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Yorktown, Virginia
Posts: 1,155
Default

when you go into manual mode, can you find an active control channel? If you get that and it still isn't working, then there are other issues.
__________________
Lynn
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 01:13 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery County, MD
Posts: 48
Default

Hi Dewey. Yes, I have MPD in one system and DCFD in another, and have them sharing a system quick key with a third system that holds all the conventional freq. in the jurisdiction.

Lynn, in manual mode sometimes I get the "can not find control channel" message, while other times I do not. When I do not have the message the radio seems to follow conversations on the selected TG as you would expect.

I'm starting to get paranoid: I think the 996 is doing this just to taunt me.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 03:46 PM
alphabravo1's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,041
Default

Are you using software to program.

I did it with my BCD396t and 246t and using a "popular" program, it did not correctly take/add one of the needed offsets. I had to go in manually and verify my settings.

So that's the suggestion I have is that you manually recheck you settings.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 04:59 PM
Dewey's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 435
Send a message via ICQ to Dewey Send a message via AIM to Dewey Send a message via MSN to Dewey Send a message via Yahoo to Dewey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by allen5565
Hi Dewey. Yes, I have MPD in one system and DCFD in another, and have them sharing a system quick key with a third system that holds all the conventional freq. in the jurisdiction.

Lynn, in manual mode sometimes I get the "can not find control channel" message, while other times I do not. When I do not have the message the radio seems to follow conversations on the selected TG as you would expect.

I'm starting to get paranoid: I think the 996 is doing this just to taunt me.
Ok then, while 460.025 and 460.100 are the control channels used the most, ensure that you have all four of the control channels in the database programmed. Also, don't forget that there are two custom tables. If all you have entered is the first table (453.450/12.5/380), you're going to miss the majority of the transmissions since that table only concerns one voice frequency (453.450). Conversly, if you only have the 460.025/12.5/480 table entered, you're going to miss all conversations that trunk to voice frequency 453.450. If that doesn't do it, time to look at other things.

Dewey
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 08:57 PM
alphabravo1's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dewey
Ok then, while 460.025 and 460.100 are the control channels used the most, ensure that you have all four of the control channels in the database programmed. Also, don't forget that there are two custom tables. If all you have entered is the first table (453.450/12.5/380), you're going to miss the majority of the transmissions since that table only concerns one voice frequency (453.450). Conversly, if you only have the 460.025/12.5/480 table entered, you're going to miss all conversations that trunk to voice frequency 453.450. If that doesn't do it, time to look at other things.

Dewey
You know that's what I was trying to say. I didn't come near saying any of that.
And I hope it's that simple for him. Also I attached my BCD396T files, which will work in the 996

Last edited by newsalan; 05-03-2008 at 03:24 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2008, 11:28 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery County, MD
Posts: 48
Default

SUCCESS!!! It's amazing what a little thing like electricity will do for a setup. I ripped open my console and discovered that --lo!-- the MilSpec Stridsberg blew a fuse. No wonder the 996 wasn't pulling in anything: It was starved for signal strength, the trunk-mounted NMO (already losing 2.1 db off the bat because of mounting location) feeding an unpowered multicoupler that can do nothing but slice the antenna signal into thirds and pipe the diminished results to the trio of scanners. (Of course, it doesn't explain why the 796s still sucked in transmissions, but what the heck...) A new fuse and all my toys are pulling in 4-5 bars all over town.

Many thanks for your collective ears and brains, folks. I am also grateful to you for your patience and interest, too.

Be safe. Have fun.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 06:27 AM
alphabravo1's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by allen5565
SUCCESS!!! It's amazing what a little thing like electricity will do for a setup. I ripped open my console and discovered that --lo!-- the MilSpec Stridsberg blew a fuse. No wonder the 996 wasn't pulling in anything: It was starved for signal strength, the trunk-mounted NMO (already losing 2.1 db off the bat because of mounting location) feeding an unpowered multicoupler that can do nothing but slice the antenna signal into thirds and pipe the diminished results to the trio of scanners. (Of course, it doesn't explain why the 796s still sucked in transmissions, but what the heck...) A new fuse and all my toys are pulling in 4-5 bars all over town.

Many thanks for your collective ears and brains, folks. I am also grateful to you for your patience and interest, too.

Be safe. Have fun.
Hey, it could have easily been one of us... glad it's working for you.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 08:11 AM
Dewey's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 435
Send a message via ICQ to Dewey Send a message via AIM to Dewey Send a message via MSN to Dewey Send a message via Yahoo to Dewey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by allen5565
SUCCESS!!! It's amazing what a little thing like electricity will do for a setup. I ripped open my console and discovered that --lo!-- the MilSpec Stridsberg blew a fuse. No wonder the 996 wasn't pulling in anything: It was starved for signal strength, the trunk-mounted NMO (already losing 2.1 db off the bat because of mounting location) feeding an unpowered multicoupler that can do nothing but slice the antenna signal into thirds and pipe the diminished results to the trio of scanners. (Of course, it doesn't explain why the 796s still sucked in transmissions, but what the heck...) A new fuse and all my toys are pulling in 4-5 bars all over town.

Many thanks for your collective ears and brains, folks. I am also grateful to you for your patience and interest, too.

Be safe. Have fun.


Dewey
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 10:36 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
Default Dcfd & Bct-15

Since it seems like some of you know these scanners very well i thought you might be able to help me. I just purchased a BCT15 and am new to the Uniden dynamic scanning setup. I am using ARC-15 to program the scanner. I downloaded the frequencies directly from RadioReference into the ARC-15 programming system for DCFD but i haven't had any luck with hearing any transmissions. The system is setup with 2 sites - the 800 and the 400, including all of the DCFD talk-groups (from what i understand you need to program both in, just hear DCFD). The control channels are correct and the custom tables seem to be consistent. Any suggestions?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:04 PM
alphabravo1's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ipweston
Since it seems like some of you know these scanners very well i thought you might be able to help me. I just purchased a BCT15 and am new to the Uniden dynamic scanning setup. I am using ARC-15 to program the scanner. I downloaded the frequencies directly from RadioReference into the ARC-15 programming system for DCFD but i haven't had any luck with hearing any transmissions. The system is setup with 2 sites - the 800 and the 400, including all of the DCFD talk-groups (from what i understand you need to program both in, just hear DCFD). The control channels are correct and the custom tables seem to be consistent. Any suggestions?
Double check the off-set to what is in RR, that's one of the problems I had with Butel when I tried it last. Don't use it anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:06 PM
Wiki Admin Emeritus
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Glen Burnie, Md.
Posts: 9,783
Default

As written before, the DCFD is all digital - the BCT15 won't do this. You would need one of the digital trunktrackers.

73 Mike
__________________
links editor, Utility Monitoring Central
HF Forum moderator, RadioReference
Friends don't let friends buy Scancat Lite Plus!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:10 PM
alphabravo1's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ka3jjz
As written before, the DCFD is all digital - the BCT15 won't do this. You would need one of the digital trunktrackers.

73 Mike
Oops, should have paid more attention, I know this...
Time for a cup of coffee
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 01:41 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Melville, Suffolk Co. NY
Posts: 130
Default Covered the Pope

Spent last week in DC covering the Popes comings and goings for my job {camerman} at WCBS-TV in NYC. Got very busey programing my 396 and 785d to monitor the PD and FD. The only hitch in my efforts was to mistakenly Iding the 850 FD system as a "P-25" system. Once I changed that every thing went swimmingly! Got that "Command Bus" action on a TG in the 59000s and manny Ems Tac Ops in the 2100s. Very entertaining. We don't have much call for "digital" here in NYC, so the experance was well worth the time spent.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trunking Issue with 996 werinshades Uniden Scanners 27 05-25-2008 07:50 AM
Backlight Brightness Between 996 and 15. wise871 Uniden Scanners 9 02-27-2008 10:00 PM
996 stopped picking up TG's Lizbit Uniden Scanners 4 12-12-2007 12:19 PM
996 help figured it out frank125 Uniden Scanners 0 11-28-2007 06:38 PM
Please, I need your 996 advice! McReb Uniden Scanners 1 11-02-2006 01:15 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions