• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

SWR issues

Status
Not open for further replies.

fadec

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2010
Messages
2
In a dual antenna system, with everything properly grounded I still get high SWR readings. Though when I grab the right antenna at the base the SWR will fall to around 1.1 or so. (touching the left has not effect either good or bad.) My antenna's have "balancing" ground wires on the antenna, hooking one or both up to a ground only makes things worse.

What can I do to replicate "me" touching the right antenna base to reproduce a good SWR reading? Am I acting as load or ground on the antenna when I touch the base?

I am running a Jeep CJ-7 with dual antenna's on the rear bumper in the ONLY location that can be used. (this is a custom rock crawler and mounting locations are very limited.)
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
89
Location
Warner Robins,GA
Do away with duals and run single. Duals normally require a 1/4 wave length separation(102 inches). If you desire the dual look just run a single coax to one antenna and go from there.
 

DX949

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
364
In a dual antenna system, with everything properly grounded I still get high SWR readings. Though when I grab the right antenna at the base the SWR will fall to around 1.1 or so. (touching the left has not effect either good or bad.) My antenna's have "balancing" ground wires on the antenna, hooking one or both up to a ground only makes things worse.

What can I do to replicate "me" touching the right antenna base to reproduce a good SWR reading? Am I acting as load or ground on the antenna when I touch the base?

I am running a Jeep CJ-7 with dual antenna's on the rear bumper in the ONLY location that can be used. (this is a custom rock crawler and mounting locations are very limited.)

Put one on top and the other on the belly of your rock crawler,so when you flip it you'll still be able to call for help or assistance ;0)
 

KD0LWU

Member
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
84
Location
Kansas
Duals are a pain to get right, one may resonate, the other wont, might be a bad splice in the coax, might be shorting on one side of the coax split. When you are holding it you are creating an inductance, much like a coil would, I'd swap them side to side and see if follows the antenna or stays on the base.
I agree with the other poster though, I'd go with a single and eliminate a lot of problems! In your application I'd run a 102" stainless whip and be happy.
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
dual antennas

i was wondering if your using 75 ohm coax, not 50 ohm like a single antenna requires, this would cuase high swr's, and with dual's you need about 8 feet of space between antenna's for proper radiation
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top