vanderneut
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2005
- Messages
- 42
Does anyone know how reliable the trunking info for Fort Carson is? Can anyone send me a good pro-96 file for Fort Carson?
KC0WDZ
KC0WDZ
Fort Carson Trunking info
- Thread starter vanderneut
- Start date
- Status
Hi!!!
It's not good info several of us in the Springs have been trying to get good info without much luck. Sorry. Mark
It's not good info several of us in the Springs have been trying to get good info without much luck. Sorry. Mark
evergreenwaterman
Member
Who would want to get into Ft. Carson's comms? That's an appropriate question. Explain as you will....
Last edited:
vanderneut
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2005
- Messages
- 42
Because...
I work on Ft. Carson. I'm not trying to spy on them. I wanted to be able to monitor the repeater system during an exercise we're doing. It's just easier.
I work on Ft. Carson. I'm not trying to spy on them. I wanted to be able to monitor the repeater system during an exercise we're doing. It's just easier.
Listening
As a M/A department to them it is nice to listen to the Fire Dept.!
As a M/A department to them it is nice to listen to the Fire Dept.!
buttsrob
Member
evergreenwaterman said:
Probably for the same reason I do. He's a soldier who wants to do his job better!
I have my BCD396T with me all the time. I can monitor all the Range Control frequencies. I can hear what the Forrestry folks are doing and which training areas are closed.
Traffic on my post (Ft Stewart) is horrible! By listening to the MP channels I can often avoid accidents and slow areas.
The problem is that the (idiotic but-well meaning bureaucrat) Frequency Managers on the installations won't even let US have their system info. All in the name of "security". I am certain that I have a higher clearance than they do and I have "need to know".
It's stupid.
My advice to you Vanderneut. If you've got a PRO-96, get PRO96COM (it's a free download) and monitor the control channel for the data. Assuming it's a true APCO25 system.
M
mpg0515
Guest
evergreenwaterman said:
Why do you worry about Federal comms so much? Who cares, if they were encrypted, then obviously they don't want to be heard by the public.... So don't worry about it! Not everyone is a terrorist..... I believe that you questioned me on the Federal Protective Service also, and again if they don't want to be heard, they would probably encrypt their radios.
Last edited:
evergreenwaterman
Member
You've got a good point Mike. For sensitive comms, they probably should go encrypted, otherwise it could be interesting listening.
scanner_nut
Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
- Messages
- 98
Possible FT Carson Trunk System
I found an unidentified digital trunk system on 407.0750 mhz and 406.7750, with a system ID of A931. Activity found on 412.0250 mhz, 411.825 mhz, 413.525 mhz, 414.300 mhz tracking these 2 control channels.
In addition, I found traffic on 410.900 - talking about range control, which I assume is Ft Carson ?
73's
Eric
I found an unidentified digital trunk system on 407.0750 mhz and 406.7750, with a system ID of A931. Activity found on 412.0250 mhz, 411.825 mhz, 413.525 mhz, 414.300 mhz tracking these 2 control channels.
In addition, I found traffic on 410.900 - talking about range control, which I assume is Ft Carson ?
73's
Eric
If you found traffic about range control, then it is Ft Carson. Good catch.scanner_nut said:
- Status
