RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > U.S. Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Colorado Radio Discussion Forum


Colorado Radio Discussion Forum - Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Colorado.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2018, 8:48 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Longmont Colo
Posts: 18
Question What's up with Longmont PD

Has Longmont PD changed their TG for primary dispatch? I have not heard a peep out of them for over 12 hours, even on my new sds 100. Any info would be appreciated.

Mark
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2018, 6:33 PM
scanlist's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,990
Default

Lots of activity on TG 9516 TAC 3 ENC and 9517 Clearance ENC.

It appears they are not using their in the clear dispatch TG 9515. 156.210 analog simulcast is also silent.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2018, 8:43 PM
Spitfire8520's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,705
Default

Dispatch announced that were "moving all traffic for the rest of the evening to the Data channel" at 02:15 on Friday, September 21st. Kind of looks like the move was a little bit more long term than just the rest of the evening.

It does not look very promising seeing that normal operations has not resumed in more than 40 hours.
__________________
Mile-High Spitfire
RadioShack Pro-106 RadioShack Pro-652 RTL-SDR
MNN-250
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2018, 9:27 AM
scanlist's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,990
Default

Any additional information as to whether this is a technical issue or operational policy?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2018, 4:23 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Longmont Colo
Posts: 18
Default

I have not heard anything new except rumors of It being a "temp. situation" and unknown when it will be back to normal. That is why I am trying to get in contact with NOGTG to program my $2000 worth of bricks to include State Patrol and utilities.

Mark
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2018, 8:03 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Elevation 8308', Colorado
Posts: 413
Default

They're calling it a Pilot Project. I have my doubts it will return in the clear.

Longmont police scanners go silent for unannounced "pilot project" - Boulder Daily Camera
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2018, 10:55 AM
abqscan's Avatar
DataBase Administrator
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: AOA
Posts: 2,561
Default

I find it ironic that the pilot project was created after the media caught Longmont PD performing warrantless searches.
__________________
-Erik
I love my SBS-1eR & Mode-S Beast!
Rules and guidelines for forum post content
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2018, 4:27 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Longmont Colo
Posts: 18
Angry

This story has so many holes in it, it's not even funny. Like the members have said on this website, they are trying to cover things up. Nothing to support their generalizations. The best statement was that they said Loveland PD was encrypted. I just got the scoop from the Comm. Director. No they are in the clear. I just lost all respect for the agency and their transparency to the citizens of Longmont. My family has lived here for over 100 years and now I'm feeling like a move out of here. By the way---Curt please give a call.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2018, 5:49 PM
scanlist's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,990
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abqscan View Post
I find it ironic that the pilot project was created after the media caught Longmont PD performing warrantless searches.

Actually it was after the OIS on September 20th that Longmont went dark the following morning September 21st.


https://denver.cbslocal.com/2018/09/...mall-longmont/


The Daily Camera also has it wrong since Greeley dispatch groups are in the clear. Only the TAC groups that are ENC.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2018, 8:33 PM
gerfmon's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Longmont
Posts: 25
Default

Been monitoring the Longmont PD for close to 40 years. I just like to know what's going on around my town. Now the police have gone dark, they can spoon feed whatever they want to the people and the media. No transparency in Longmont. I intend to make a lot of noise to City Council. And the police wonder why there is so much public distrust toward them these days?

BTW, I wonder if Boulder County deputies can communicate with Longmont at all now?

Last edited by gerfmon; 10-11-2018 at 8:46 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2018, 5:31 AM
snoopyII's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: On the other side of the tracks
Posts: 258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gerfmon View Post
BTW, I wonder if Boulder County deputies can communicate with Longmont at all now?
Probably yes and no. Dispatch probably has some console to console ability, but as far as BSCO deputy to LPD dispatch direct? Not without some patch from their VHF to LPD's digital, which would have to be activated by somone's dispatch anyway. Or the obvious exception would be if BSCO is carrying multiband radios.

I agree with all of the above statements though, it would not surprise me if back room discussions started after the warrantless debacle, and then the OIS conveniently (for them) made it easier to justify...

Last edited by snoopyII; 10-12-2018 at 5:35 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2018, 7:11 AM
poltergeisty's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: RLG, Fly heading 053, intercept 315 DVV, look for the SAM
Posts: 3,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insulator View Post
The best statement was that they said Loveland PD was encrypted. I just got the scoop from the Comm. Director. No they are in the clear.I
They aren't encrypted per say, but often do use it in certain situations. Mostly for events and SWAT operations.
__________________
My Forum Project

This Sig may or may not get purged from the database...
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2018, 7:08 PM
Spitfire8520's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gerfmon View Post
BTW, I wonder if Boulder County deputies can communicate with Longmont at all now?
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoopyII View Post
Probably yes and no. Dispatch probably has some console to console ability, but as far as BSCO deputy to LPD dispatch direct? Not without some patch from their VHF to LPD's digital, which would have to be activated by somone's dispatch anyway. Or the obvious exception would be if BSCO is carrying multiband radios.
Multiband radios is the answer. The APX 7000 & 7500 has been Boulder County's standard issue radio for several years now. They have all of Longmont's encryption keys and can talk on any of Longmont's talkgroups.

Boulder County Dispatch is also directly networked into DTRS.
__________________
Mile-High Spitfire
RadioShack Pro-106 RadioShack Pro-652 RTL-SDR
MNN-250
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2018, 3:57 PM
gerfmon's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Longmont
Posts: 25
Default

Good, last I had heard, and this was quite some time ago, BCSO didn't have the Longmont encryption keys. Good to know they can still communicate.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2018, 8:54 PM
snoopyII's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: On the other side of the tracks
Posts: 258
Default

"Pilot Project" is just the way they are spinning it to make it more palatable to the public, long enough for a few news cycles to pass, and the general public to forget what's happening. I bet the necessary key filling is being or has already been done on the main dispatch TG.

"Satur emphasized that the change is a pilot project that may be adjusted in the future, but at this time there is no scheduled end date." - BS that decision has already been made, sorry guys, you can kiss Longmont goodbye and add it to the growing list gone dark...
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2018, 9:59 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Longmont Colo
Posts: 18
Default

I will be back in town mid-week and definitely plan on contacting the City Council member for my district; hopefully I can do a face-to-face with him. I sent an email to the gal that originally broke the story, but yet to hear anything back yet.

As a quick note, there was a correction in the local newspaper regarding Loveland being the big E and are in the clear for dispatch. Someone must be reading our posts. This is starting to smell like "something's rotten in Denmark's and has more holes in it like a high quality Suiss cheese.

I may just to be ornery Talley up all the quality State of the art scanners I have bought in the last 2 years and send them an invoice for them. Haha.

Later.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2018, 1:57 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 278
Default

It is pretty frustrating. At first they kept the main dispatch channel in the clear and encrypted the others, which is understandable. When an incident got sensitive they moved it to another channel. They have
no proof a scanner or app was used during a crime. As far as 5 people having a scanner in the car or home when they responded to a call or pulled someone over? The 5 people probably KNEW they were being pulled over or the cops were coming to their house so how does that affect officer safety?

Even if Boulder County has their channels I'm sure State Patrol is in the dark, even while they are passing though or en route to a call thats just outside of Longmonts jurisdiction but Longmont isn't willing to cover. They only get 3rd hand info from their dispatch and have no idea whats going on. Mutual Aid has always been an issue since we border both Weld and Larimer Counties. Many times a major vehicle accident near the border results in several "commands" being set up by the different agencies who are all on scene, making the Incident Command System useless for those incidents.

I can remember several examples in Northern Colorado of agencies not being able to COMMUNICATE and work together because of encryption.

As a volunteer ham operator, I couldn't even hear the car to car channels they would use at the same events we were supporting. As a Longmont resident, I signed up for Everbridge Alerts (like reverse 911 for people without landlines) and have NEVER received an alert. It was nice having a scanner so I knew when to lock my door because something was up in my neighborhood, or encourage my kids to go to a different park because someone was just shot or stabbed at the one they planned to go to. As a school district employee, it was nice to have an idea of what was going on when several cops were across the street but they hadn't notified the school.

I think it does more damage than good, and we all have legitimate legal reasons to monitor public safety. Maybe they can buy us all ice cream to make us feel better: https://denver.cbslocal.com/2018/10/...-arrest-lobby/
__________________
Nathan KD0OEO MNN-128
Pro-106, Uniden 436-HP
Austin Spectra mobile antenna, Arrow J-Pole
Yaesu FT60-R, Kenwood TM-71A, Icom ID-51a
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2018, 3:43 PM
AI7PM's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: The Intermountain West
Posts: 344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathancarlson View Post
It is pretty frustrating.At first they kept the main dispatch channel in the clear and encrypted the others, which is understandable. When an incident got sensitive they moved it to another channel. They have
no proof a scanner or app was used during a crime. As far as 5 people having a scanner in the car or home when they responded to a call or pulled someone over? The 5 people probably KNEW they were being pulled over or the cops were coming to their house so how does that affect officer safety?

Even if Boulder County has their channels I'm sure State Patrol is in the dark, even while they are passing though or en route to a call thats just outside of Longmonts jurisdiction but Longmont isn't willing to cover. They only get 3rd hand info from their dispatch and have no idea whats going on. Mutual Aid has always been an issue since we border both Weld and Larimer Counties. Many times a major vehicle accident near the border results in several "commands" being set up by the different agencies who are all on scene, making the Incident Command System useless for those incidents.

I can remember several examples in Northern Colorado of agencies not being able to COMMUNICATE and work together because of encryption.

As a volunteer ham operator, I couldn't even hear the car to car channels they would use at the same events we were supporting. As a Longmont resident, I signed up for Everbridge Alerts (like reverse 911 for people without landlines) and have NEVER received an alert. It was nice having a scanner so I knew when to lock my door because something was up in my neighborhood, or encourage my kids to go to a different park because someone was just shot or stabbed at the one they planned to go to. As a school district employee, it was nice to have an idea of what was going on when several cops were across the street but they hadn't notified the school.

I think it does more damage than good, and we all have legitimate legal reasons to monitor public safety. Maybe they can buy us all ice cream to make us feel better: https://denver.cbslocal.com/2018/10/...-arrest-lobby/
If I may, I'd like to offer an alternative point of view and ask questions on a couple of you points.

"It's frustrating".
I get that for the listening enthusiast. And, the PSAP isn't there to serve radio enthusiast.

"I'm sure State Patrol is in the dark.../....They only get 3rd hand info from their dispatch...."
Their dispatch is the channel they would primarily (should/need to be) be on anyway, unless asked to change to LPD or an interop. Would they really be in the dark, or actually know what it is they NEED to know via appropriate channels? The two (or more) PSAPs can talk to each other at the push of a button and coordinate response or channel changes.

"I can remember several examples in Northern Colorado of agencies not being able to COMMUNICATE and work together because of encryption."
Encryption would have had zero to do with this, as any interop freqs would be in the clear, with multiple freqs (think NIFOG, Blue NW, Red NW) available for their use.

"As a volunteer ham operator, I couldn't even hear the car to car channels they would use at the same events we were supporting."
What is your need as a ham to hear their comms at an event you are supporting? I ask, because I hear this from many hams, even at events where they aren't hearing the other ham freqs that may be in use at the event. It seems that being on a frequency being used to cover one's assignment isn't enough. If I'm assigned a given channel/freq for my support roll, shouldn't that be where I'm listening to support my work?

"....and we all have legitimate legal reasons to monitor public safety."
I could probably defend various positions on that, but I'd like to hear your thinking and legal references on it.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Yesterday, 8:57 AM
scanlist's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,990
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AI7PM View Post
If I may, I'd like to offer an alternative point of view and ask questions on a couple of you points.

"It's frustrating".
I get that for the listening enthusiast. And, the PSAP isn't there to serve radio enthusiast.
The OP is very well aware of this.

Quote:
"I'm sure State Patrol is in the dark.../....They only get 3rd hand info from their dispatch...."
Their dispatch is the channel they would primarily (should/need to be) be on anyway, unless asked to change to LPD or an interop. Would they really be in the dark, or actually know what it is they NEED to know via appropriate channels? The two (or more) PSAPs can talk to each other at the push of a button and coordinate response or channel changes.
CSP troopers do monitor the county and Longmont dispatch channels and have, on many occasions, showed up on their dispatch channels for queries and offers of assistance. They do have scanning radios in the patrol cars on VHF.

Quote:
"I can remember several examples in Northern Colorado of agencies not being able to COMMUNICATE and work together because of encryption."
Encryption would have had zero to do with this, as any interop freqs would be in the clear, with multiple freqs (think NIFOG, Blue NW, Red NW) available for their use.
The ability of officers being able to monitor neighboring agencies is where Nathan is going with this. Fort Collins is the biggest example of isolationism. CSU and Estes Park went along with this as well.

Weld County is on FRCC and officers in the field do NOT have access to the BLUE and RED interop TG's since they are used in the Metro area. WELD dispatch has to initiate an ISSI patch to interact with DTRS every time. The latest example of this is in the CBS 4 news article Nathan linked to in his post. I heard this as it happened. No one on the Weld side of this incident knew what the hell was going on. It was treated as an active shooter and hostage situation. It was well over 30 minutes before the realization that it was Longmont arresting a suspect at a U.C. health community E.R.

Larimer is DTRS they don't have the BLUE/RED metro groups however MAC is the fallback.

Quote:
"....and we all have legitimate legal reasons to monitor public safety."
I could probably defend various positions on that, but I'd like to hear your thinking and legal references on it.
If the comm is in the clear it's legal provided the person monitoring is not using it for criminal purposes. Doesn't get any clearer than that.

.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Yesterday, 3:11 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Longmont Colo
Posts: 18
Thumbs up

Today's edition of the Longmont Times Call has a great Editorial named "Police radio silence goes too far"
Glad to see the media's twist on this B.$ that is going on here in Longmon.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions