New Site 329 & 351 Woodrow Area - Washington County

[jimmnn]

Also note new Site 351 listed as a neighbor with a 700Mhz control channel, has anyone identified either 329 or 351 exact locations?

Jim<

FileVersion:3
-TowerInfo
#This section is here for information only. With the exception
#of the Call Sign(s), This data is not Read back into the program at all.
System ID : d1c
System Name : State of Colorado
WACN : bee07
Tower Number (Decimal): 329
Tower Number (Hex) : T031D
Tower Description : (null)
Control Capabilities : Data,Voice,Registration
Call Sign(s) : WQEE618
Timestamp : Mon May 29 14:47:33 2006

-Tables
#Format: Table ID,Base Freq,Spacing,Input Offset,Assumed/Confirmed,BandWidth
00,851.00625,0.00625,-45.00000,"Confirmed",0.00625
01,762.00625,0.00625,30.00000,"Confirmed",0.00625

-Frequencies
#Format: Channel,Usage,Frequency
"00-2493","vi",866.58750
"00-2619","av",867.37500
"00-2663","av",867.65000
"00-2697","c",867.86250
"00-2763","a",868.27500

-Neighbors
#Format: TowerID,TowerIDHex,System ID,Channel,Frequency,Tower Name
316,"T0310",d1c,"00-2789",868.43750,"Fort Morgan (West Fort Morgan) - City of Fort Morgan / I-76"
317,"T0311",d1c,"00-2799",868.50000,"Akron (2mi W of Akron) - North Washington County / I-76"
318,"T0312",d1c,"00-2611",867.32500,"Reiradon Hill (9mi E of Sterling) - Logan County / I-76"
325,"T0319",d1c,"00-2819",868.62500,"New Raymer (East Raymer) - North Weld & Morgan Counties / I-76"
351,"T0333",d1c,"01-2046",774.79375,""

 

[dodger]

Site 329

5.4 MILES SW OF BRUSH, CO MORGAN County. Maybe site 351 might be in NE adams???

 

[greenthumb]

329 is in the database as Pawnee in Morgan county (one county west of Washington county) and looks OK. The FCC license lines up with it, too...

 

[scanlist]

For the out of state DB admins. Don't make the mistake of believing the FCC data as gospel for this radio system. It's not.

Since they won't say it thanks Jim for the updates.

Phil.

 

[greenthumb]

Don't make the mistake of believing the FCC data as gospel for this radio system. It's not.

Understood, however, it should be noted that for the rural 4- and 5-channel IR sites on the system the FCC data does seem to line up, and these sites comprise a great majority of the system. The only problem areas seem to be the large sites in the Denver metro. area where frequencies came from all over creation.

Being as the sites in question here are some of the outliers, I would tend to give more credit to the FCC data.

 

[scanlist]

351 May be in Hoyt.

Phil.

 

[scanlist]

351 May be in Hoyt.

Phil.