RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners, Receivers and Related Equipment Forums > General Scanning Discussion


General Scanning Discussion - For general questions not specific to a model of scanner or general discussion of use of a scanner. Manufacturer specific posts should be directed to the appropriate forums below and location specific posts should go in the appropriate regional forum..

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2017, 7:27 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 38
Default Bc125at vs icom r5

Hello All,

Looking at maybe getting an BC125AT. I currently have an Icom R5, as far as shear performance, sensitivity and reception, which scanner is better? I listen to MILAIR and CIVILAIR.

Features wise I know the 125AT, is much better, plus the scan rate on the Icom is very slooooooow when compared to the 125AT, so that's a HUGE plus.

I've had GREAT LUCK with the Icom, But, just curious how they perform when comparing the 2.

Thanks,

Luke


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2017, 8:13 PM
marksmith's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Anne Arundel County, MD
Posts: 3,614
Default

To give you an answer comparing the two, someone would need to own both. Probably not likely.

Have owned a predecessor to the R5, and it was a little quirky on the programming and very very slow to scan, but an extremely sensitive receiver.

Never owned an R5 so can't help.

Have a bc125at, and it's pretty good in the milair stuff and general vhf and uhf, which is what I use it for. Conventional stuff, not trunked.

I understand it misses the top 20mz or so of the milair band. Not sure what is up there.

The programming is a little more straight foreward, and scanning pretty fast.

536/436/ws1095/996p2/996xt/325p2/396xt/psr800/396t/HP-1/HP-2 & others
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2017, 1:42 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Somwhere in South Pacific
Posts: 297
Default

I owned R6 briefly sold it due to frustration. I own UBC126AT now among other hand held scanners (same as 125) and really like it. Easy to program via software or even manually via keypad. Good sensitivity, nice sound. R6 was nice pocked friendly radio but the menu structure was time consuming to learn, hard to program on the field etc. Only thing going for it was small size excellent battery life. NO regrets. Get BC125AT you get good radio, free keypad and Close Call. Using all radios with Enelope and Enelope Pro batteries.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2017, 6:37 AM
pb_lonny's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 804
Default

I have owned both the R5 and the UBC126AT. The R5 has better RF performance but the UBC126AT is easier to use.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions