Project25_MASTR
Millennial Graying OBT Guy
Guess I saw this on Facebook the other day...not quite sure it's a good idea but who knows.
Well, the GMRS module will be separate from the amateur module. There won't be any mixing of frequencies. That's how the template is set up now. I'm not sure how he's going to set up how updates can be submitted. I would hope you'd have to register a GMRS call sign to gain update capabilities. He's only asking for GMRS licensees to assist in the project. I think it is safe to assume that there won't be any "ham interference" in a GMRS service related project. Many admins hold a GMRS license also.I do as well. However, I look at it from the view of giving hams who believe they have a right to GMRS easy access. I don't think it belongs now that repeater book made the decision to list internationally (GMRS in that application is only applicable to the U.S.).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Isn't this essentially a duplication of MyGMRS.com?Well, the GMRS module will be separate from the amateur module. There won't be any mixing of frequencies. That's how the template is set up now. I'm not sure how he's going to set up how updates can be submitted. I would hope you'd have to register a GMRS call sign to gain update capabilities. He's only asking for GMRS licensees to assist in the project. I think it is safe to assume that there won't be any "ham interference" in a GMRS service related project. Many admins hold a GMRS license also.
Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
Well, this will be user editable. Submissions are approved quickly. Admins are selected for each state, to assist in verification. I'm aware of nonexistent repeaters on mygmrs. There is no verification mechanism in place.Isn't this essentially a duplication of MyGMRS.com?
It might be best to have appropriate warnings and info for both areas; amateur and GMRS.They will be on a separate branch so as not to be intermingled with the ham stuff. Regardless, I understand your points. The front page should have the appropriate warnings. I will let the power that be about any concerns. He is looking for input and this is good stuff.
Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
Well, this will be user editable. Submissions are approved quickly. Admins are selected for each state, to assist in verification. I'm aware of nonexistent repeaters on mygmrs. There is no verification mechanism in place.
Mygmrs is an excellent resource. GMRS licensees are the only persons given access to most resources. That keeps discussion at a high quality level.
Anyhow, there exists several repeater databases. The rb owner now wants to allow a convenient access for both services in one place. Also, data are kept current, where many other sources May or may not ever be updated.
And...it's free [emoji3]
Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
I'm aware of more non-existent repeaters on Repeater Book...and they are a ***** get off the listings (because the owners have all SK'd in the last x amount of years).
However, anyone can list on Repeater Book. On MyGMRS the owner is the only one who can list (which also has the benefit of the admin's being able to directly contact about a "ghost system". How will repeater book handle accessing the system owner information for people to request permission for usage? It can't as it is currently setup (kinda defeats the purpose of having a mobile app).
Just not a good idea.
I just posted some of the concerns to the admin list, so they have been aired. The owner of RB wants input, so everyone who comments positive or negative is a big help.
If you're a MyGMRS member, check out the thread in the private discussion. Poll results are opposite of here. A lot of the guys who frequent that site are also system owners...
I`ll give ya my thoughts from the view of a listener of GMRS (no desire to get a license, i already have enough radios thanx ), and personally i think this is kinda neat...from a LISTENING standpoint only, i do understand what manner of can o` worms this could potentially open if it`s not dealt with by those with the proper smarts, get this right and it`ll be a big convenience, both for users of GMRS and folks like me that just want to locate a repeater in whatever location i`m at and give it a listen, but get this wrong and the whole thingy could fly off the tracks, and i`m sure we don`t want that . So that said, is this a good idea? Mabey, for the reasons i gave. Bad idea? potentially, again for the reasons i mentioned. One thought that just popped into my noggin would be to have the GMRS listing ether one, set out from the ham listings on the app, secured behind a password/username (likely the licensee`s callsign), or two, have the GMRS listing as a seperate update, agaon requiring a username/password to obtain. N9NRA