N5FDL
Member
Maybe I am alone in worrying about this -- and I am led to believe this is a non-fixable artifact of the wondrous object-oriented database inside the radio -- but it sure is a pain not to be able to know what scan list needs to be locked out simply by looking at the display when the radio stops on a particular frequency.
Example: My Uniden always shows what scan lists are turned on (as does the 500), BUT when the 996 stops on a channel that scan list number flashes. That makes it easy to turn off the scan list when the radio stops on something I don't want to hear. The 500 does not work this way.
As far as I can tell, with the 500, the user is required to have an excellent memory because while scanning (and even in manual mode) the scan lists are hard to manage. That means you can't easily find out what scan list to turn off -- so you better memorize, make a label, do something.
For me, this issue makes the 500's object-oriented programming a lot less sexy. While I like being able to easily assign a frequency to multple scan lists, or mix talk groups and conventional channels in a single scan list (which is sorta slick), if I lose control of the scanner in the deal, well, I did rather be able to easily identify and control scan lists.
Hopefully, the next salvo in the War of the Scanners, will be a Uniden radio that picks up the major features of the 500 -- especially the cellphone-esque user interface -- but not the object-oriented programming. At least not unless Uniden could still allow scan lists to be displayed and managed the same way as today on the 996.
Don't get me wrong, the 500 is the best scanner I've ever owned. (I am not having trunking problems). The UI is truly superior. Object-orientation is a great idea and works nicely, I just can't live with what seems to be a necessary trade-off.
Example: My Uniden always shows what scan lists are turned on (as does the 500), BUT when the 996 stops on a channel that scan list number flashes. That makes it easy to turn off the scan list when the radio stops on something I don't want to hear. The 500 does not work this way.
As far as I can tell, with the 500, the user is required to have an excellent memory because while scanning (and even in manual mode) the scan lists are hard to manage. That means you can't easily find out what scan list to turn off -- so you better memorize, make a label, do something.
For me, this issue makes the 500's object-oriented programming a lot less sexy. While I like being able to easily assign a frequency to multple scan lists, or mix talk groups and conventional channels in a single scan list (which is sorta slick), if I lose control of the scanner in the deal, well, I did rather be able to easily identify and control scan lists.
Hopefully, the next salvo in the War of the Scanners, will be a Uniden radio that picks up the major features of the 500 -- especially the cellphone-esque user interface -- but not the object-oriented programming. At least not unless Uniden could still allow scan lists to be displayed and managed the same way as today on the 996.
Don't get me wrong, the 500 is the best scanner I've ever owned. (I am not having trunking problems). The UI is truly superior. Object-orientation is a great idea and works nicely, I just can't live with what seems to be a necessary trade-off.