Heard a CC on 153.260 during enhanced conditions, which may belong to the same system. However, getting slightly odd network/site IDs from DSD+, such as R13-32 and R13-56, plus some neighbours with very large site numbers (didn't copy them down). Safe to assume it's network 13, sites 32 and 56?
Dave
Yes, safe to assume Network 13, Sites 32 and 56. The large site numbers have always been the result of bad decodes. I see that alot when I'm doing tropo DXing and working with weak signals. It is to be expected. Fortunately, you obviously think sanely. Just forget about those things that do not seem sane and figure that it was bad decoding.
Just a caution to you - DB admins are supposed to enter in NXDN system IDs without L or R, but from time to time you might find an entry in the DB that is prefixed with L or R because it was added before that policy was set. So, when looking in the DB for NXDN system IDs, if DSDPlus shows it with an L or an R, search for it with the L or R and without the L or R when you search in the DB. And if you happen to discover an NXDN system in the DB whose system ID is prefixed with L or R, simply make a submission to that system and request that the admin remove the L/R from the system ID and just make a note of the area on the system page.
I'd agree with MCIUPA regarding it being Mobiltech. You might consider submitting your sysid 13 findings to that trunked system. Obviously an admin would have to create a new system that was specifically NXDN48, but if you submit it to the LTR system then a local NY admin who is used to working those submissions can easily create the new system based upon that info. Otherwise, if you submit it as a new system, a local NY admin won't see the submission and it will get generically added by a global admin.
Mike
