The ODF page needs some work. https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?aid=1177
There are a lot of duplicate frequencies with same PL tones just different names, within the same area. Below is an example of what I'm referring to. This is in the Northwest Ops Area:
151.20500 159.43500 KA3198 BM 179.9 PL ODF 11-F North Cascade District - High Heaven Repeater FMN Fire Dispatch
151.20500 159.43500 KA3198 BM 179.9 PL ODF 11-C North Cascade District - Mt. Horeb Repeater FMN Fire Dispatch
151.20500 159.43500 KA3198 BM 179.9 PL ODF 11-E North Cascade District - Skamania Repeater FMN Fire Dispatch
I'm going to clean this up, and simply list one frequency like such:
151.20500 159.43500 KA3198 BM 179.9 PL ODF 11 North Cascade District FMN Fire Dispatch
I am also thinking about breaking it down into smaller geographic areas. For example the "south operational area" includes frequencies from Coos Forest in the west, to Walker Range in the east. This is a large geographic area and I think it should be broken up in smaller areas. Same with East Ops area, from Central Oregon District to NE Oregon, a huge GPS range. This would keep your scan list smaller and improve scanning speed. What does the group think of breaking it up into smaller areas by districts? I don't want redo it based on just my opinion, so i'm asking for feedback.
There are a lot of duplicate frequencies with same PL tones just different names, within the same area. Below is an example of what I'm referring to. This is in the Northwest Ops Area:
151.20500 159.43500 KA3198 BM 179.9 PL ODF 11-F North Cascade District - High Heaven Repeater FMN Fire Dispatch
151.20500 159.43500 KA3198 BM 179.9 PL ODF 11-C North Cascade District - Mt. Horeb Repeater FMN Fire Dispatch
151.20500 159.43500 KA3198 BM 179.9 PL ODF 11-E North Cascade District - Skamania Repeater FMN Fire Dispatch
I'm going to clean this up, and simply list one frequency like such:
151.20500 159.43500 KA3198 BM 179.9 PL ODF 11 North Cascade District FMN Fire Dispatch
I am also thinking about breaking it down into smaller geographic areas. For example the "south operational area" includes frequencies from Coos Forest in the west, to Walker Range in the east. This is a large geographic area and I think it should be broken up in smaller areas. Same with East Ops area, from Central Oregon District to NE Oregon, a huge GPS range. This would keep your scan list smaller and improve scanning speed. What does the group think of breaking it up into smaller areas by districts? I don't want redo it based on just my opinion, so i'm asking for feedback.