I'm trying to understand the logic behind scanner recommendations. It's almost every day that someone asks for recommendations, and the answers can vary. The reason this question even pops into my head is due to the recent recommendations of the SDS-200. From my understanding, only the beta testers have experience using it at the moment. Not a whole lot of people have their hands on it to compare to other scanners. I also see a lot of recommendations for the SDS-100. Granted, this one has been out for a while and there's plenty of information about it here on the forums. But why recommend a ~$650 scanner to a newbie when a ~$350 one will do what they want?
So, why do you recommend a particular scanner over an other? I'm intrigued to see everyone's answers and hopefully learn a thing or two from all of you!
So, why do you recommend a particular scanner over an other? I'm intrigued to see everyone's answers and hopefully learn a thing or two from all of you!