- Joined
- Aug 23, 2002
- Messages
- 3,620
The CDOT section in the RRDB will be getting some minor tweaks so that its a touch more uniform, but I'd like to know the following, as I don't monitor CDOT all that often:
Traffic Channels - are they a dispatch talkgroup for the supervisors to the respective sections, or managing the Denver metro/highway traffic incidents? I have heard both types of transmissions.
I am curious if they should be at the top of the hierarchy if they are decent as a "Dispatch" type of channel (or not)
Are the section non-tac channels dispatch or coordination talkgroups, vs tac. Again, mixed traffic has been heard between say, "Tom" vs "Tom Tac". This also may be an error on the initial submission to the DB years ago were some talkgroups may have been entered or submitted backwards.
Any organizational hierarchy would be apprireated.
Traffic Channels - are they a dispatch talkgroup for the supervisors to the respective sections, or managing the Denver metro/highway traffic incidents? I have heard both types of transmissions.
I am curious if they should be at the top of the hierarchy if they are decent as a "Dispatch" type of channel (or not)
Are the section non-tac channels dispatch or coordination talkgroups, vs tac. Again, mixed traffic has been heard between say, "Tom" vs "Tom Tac". This also may be an error on the initial submission to the DB years ago were some talkgroups may have been entered or submitted backwards.
Any organizational hierarchy would be apprireated.