It's probably the perspective of the picture but I just measured them and they are 72 inches long. Is that right for an R-9? The manual I found shows them to be 49 inches for an R-9.That would be an R9 but the radials look a bit long or the picture is wide angle right at the base.
It's probably the perspective of the picture but I just measured them and they are 72 inches long. Is that right for an R-9?
The manual I found shows them to be 49 inches for an R-9.I've never had an R9 but have played with the R7 series and those were about 72in.
Sure does look like a Cushcraft R9 antenna. Best thing to do is to sweep it with a good antenna analyzer to see where the SWR dips are to confirm that it is a 9-Band vertical antenna tuned for the amateur bands.
Question for @DRBComm: Is the QTH located at a prime location for a ham? That home "accessory" is a nice addition to the property. How about where the coax run terminated inside the house? Is that a room specially built for a ham station?
73, Dave K4EET
Looks to me more like the Hy-Gain AV-680 (or from that family). The matching box on the bottom and the drooping radials point me in that direction.
Hy-Gain AV-680 Hy-Gain AV-680 Patriot-Plus HF Vertical Antennas | DX Engineering
Cushcraft R9 Cushcraft R9 Nine-Band Vertical Antennas | DX Engineering
Looks to me more like the Hy-Gain AV-680 (or from that family). The matching box on the bottom and the drooping radials point me in that direction.
Hy-Gain AV-680 Hy-Gain AV-680 Patriot-Plus HF Vertical Antennas | DX Engineering
Cushcraft R9 Cushcraft R9 Nine-Band Vertical Antennas | DX Engineering
I think you nailed it as an AV-680 series as the Cushcraft has two cylindrical traps near the top and the OPs picture does not. Otherwise it looks like one company copied the other.