CLMRN (was CSERN)

[nhfdcadet]

Gotcha. My guess is that we are using the NW TG 2 patched to our channel for trials, but I’ll know more Saturday.

correct. Just a console patch, id imagine once everything is ironed out with the state, there will be a dedicated naugatuck ems talkgroup

 

[cg]

TG 1812 is the temp Naugatuck EMS patch

 

[nhfdcadet]

TG 1812 is the temp Naugatuck EMS patch

Aka NW tg 2

 

[W1KNE]

NWCTPS covers both litchfield and new haven counties, as well as providing CMED services in fairfield county as well. My guess to why it is considered a Litchfield County talkgroup would be that it's primary site is troop L simulcast, but that's just a guess.

If they do cover multiple counties, I can separate them out. They were submitted as being in Litchfield county. HOWEVER,
the DB here only allows me to "assign" them to one county at a time, or Systemwide. I can set the geographic range to cover the two counties, but the default will be Litchfield.

 

[nhfdcadet]

If they do cover multiple counties, I can separate them out. They were submitted as being in Litchfield county. HOWEVER,
the DB here only allows me to "assign" them to one county at a time, or Systemwide. I can set the geographic range to cover the two counties, but the default will be Litchfield.

It doesn’t make any difference to me, but what about a “psap talkgroup” category and/or “lcd talkgroups” “nwctps talkgroups” “ valley shore talkgroups” etc

 

[izzyj4]

NWCTPS covers both litchfield and new haven counties, as well as providing CMED services in fairfield county as well. My guess to why it is considered a Litchfield County talkgroup would be that it's primary site is troop L simulcast, but that's just a guess.

There area already some CMED channels on the system, and likely will be more in the future.

Don't forget a couple towns in upper Fairfield county for C-MED purposes as well.

 

[nhfdcadet]

Don't forget a couple towns in upper Fairfield county for C-MED purposes as well.

Yup that’s there, also realized I said “as well” twice *facepalm*

 

[W1KNE]

I've moved the two NWCTPS talkgroups to their own category.

 

[izzyj4]

TG 13801 for Durham fire coming in Lima Charlie on the Troop I site. They have a working structure fire on Route 68.

I know its listed, more so an FYI for coming in on the Troop I site.

 

[scottb908]

This is a pretty long thread so not sure if it was answered already. Seeing a bunch of unknown ID's on my calls feed. Anyone know what they are?

 

[doctordialtone]

This is a pretty long thread so not sure if it was answered already. Seeing a bunch of unknown ID's on my calls feed. Anyone know what they are?View attachment 116845

The 65xxx are Dynamic talk groups which change regularly. They are not assigned to anyone.

The 912 is unknown and I never hear any voice traffic on it.

The 20912 is a town using CLMRN

There is a formula for figuring out who by Town Tax code.

 

[pro106import]

This is a pretty long thread so not sure if it was answered already. Seeing a bunch of unknown ID's on my calls feed. Anyone know what they are?View attachment 116845

20912 is Plainfield PD
Other unknown TG's that others have discovered are here:

Connecticut Land Mobile Radio Network (CLMRN) Unknown Talkgroups - The RadioReference Wiki

wiki.radioreference.com

Bob

 

[Reconrider]

The 65xxx are Dynamic talk groups which change regularly. They are not assigned to anyone.

The 912 is unknown and I never hear any voice traffic on it.

The 20912 is a town using CLMRN

There is a formula for figuring out who by Town Tax code.

I used to have the town tax code formula saved but I had to reformat my computer after a bad ssd.
Can you tell me the formula? Thanks

 

[doctordialtone]

I used to have the town tax code formula saved but I had to reformat my computer after a bad ssd.
Can you tell me the formula? Thanks

See here:

Anyone able to help identify any of these talkgroups on the CLMRN please?

Town Tax Codes

 

[scottb908]

If those are confirmed towns would it make sense to get it added to the database?

 

[n1chu]

…not if they change regularly or are only temporary… and the system is watched pretty closely and updated as necessary by the admins after they have vetted submissions.

 

[Shockwavrider]

So I was having trouble with picking up (like DEAF!!!) a number of Troops with a recent reprogramming of the scanner and appending from full Sentinel DB.
When I looked under the individual sites to eliminate all but Control and Alternate Control channels and x-ref's with RR DB I found quite a few frequencies that were incorrect. These frequencies all ended in zeros and should have ended in 5 for example the Sentinel download had them as xxx.yyy0 when they should have been xxx.yyy5.

Suddenly what had appeared to be a deaf scanner on a number of the Troop Simulcast and other sites brough them baclk to life.

Just a heads up if you are experiencing simlar problems if you updated from Sentienl DB and did not x-ref from RR.

 

[Cheeseburgers]

So I was having trouble with picking up (like DEAF!!!) a number of Troops with a recent reprogramming of the scanner and appending from full Sentinel DB.
When I looked under the individual sites to eliminate all but Control and Alternate Control channels and x-ref's with RR DB I found quite a few frequencies that were incorrect. These frequencies all ended in zeros and should have ended in 5 for example the Sentinel download had them as xxx.yyy0 when they should have been xxx.yyy5.

Suddenly what had appeared to be a deaf scanner on a number of the Troop Simulcast and other sites brough them baclk to life.

Just a heads up if you are experiencing simlar problems if you updated from Sentienl DB and did not x-ref from RR.

I think this is a sentinel problem, because it used to this on the old SmartZone system iirc

 

[SABER3]

Any reason why the CSP encrypted the traffic channels?

 

[Reconrider]

No body but then know. If you ask them, let us know the reason they give