RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners, Receivers and Related Equipment Forums > Antennas and Associated Hardware > Scanner / Receiver Antennas


Scanner / Receiver Antennas - For discussion of any type of receiving antenna used by a scanner or receiver base, mobile or handheld.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 10:02 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5
Default Longer antenna, worth it? If so, which?

I'm kind of new to monitoring, so forgive this if its a rookie question. I have a Radio Shack Pro-97 that I use to monitor mostly aviation and local fire/police traffic (mostly in the 100 and 400 MHz range, I believe). I have the stock 5 1/2 in antenna. I live about 7 miles from out local airport and my scanner seems to be out of range for most of the ATC traffic. Is there a longer or more efficient antenna that will fit my portable that will increase my receiving range? I thought I saw a longer antenna for this model a while back at Radio Shack, but not sure if its applicable to my needs or even still available (no joy on Radio Shacks web site).

Thanks!!! - John, St. Louis
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 10:13 PM
Completely Banned for the Greater Good
   
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orange City, Fl.
Posts: 673
Default RS PRO-97 antenna

I know a few portable scanner owners who share your problem, everybody has a favorite however the guys that replaced their stock antennas with the Austin Condor antenna all claimed positive results.
Austin Antenna, antennas
FLRAILMAN
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 11:51 PM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 287
Default

I have a Condor and a Diamond RH-77B both of which I've had for years now. They significantly improve reception vs any of the stock antennas I've had on several scanners.

I prefer the RH-77B simply because it is skinnier and doesn't tip over the scanner as easily as the more dense Condor. I think the Condor has an edge on a few odd bands that I don't generally listen on, but it's very close.

More antenna is almost always better for reception. A telescopic whip, metal, is the best I've used of any...however be very careful of putting strain on your antenna connector on the scanner. It's very easy with those to bang into something and break or damage the connector as the better ones are 4-5' long. With my current scanner and ham HT's I use an SMA to BNC adapter to add some more protection to the SMA connector.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 12:10 AM
n5ims's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,594
Default

Please note that antenna length doesn't indicate strength or range. The length of an antenna is based on frequency and other design parameters. Generally, the higher in frequency you go, the shorter the antenna (of the same design type) would be for one designed to work on that frequency.

Aircraft communication is a bit tricky to monitor. The ground stations are designed to communicate with aircraft flying at high altitudes and their antennas are designed to radiate their signals there. It's pretty hard to hear them from monitoring stations very far from them unless they have a pretty high antenna. Aircraft, however, transmit their signals toward the ground and are generally pretty easy to hear.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 1:25 AM
W8RMH's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Grove City, Ohio (Bearcat not a Buckeye)
Posts: 6,991
Default

Comet CH75 Amateur HT Antenna


The above is a great scanner antenna, from universal radio, it may improve your air reception, but air is difficult to receive, as stated above. Good Luck.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 9:01 AM
Not Posting
   
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrbugee View Post
I have a Radio Shack Pro-97 that I use to monitor mostly aviation and local fire/police traffic (mostly in the 100 and 400 MHz range, I believe). Thanks!!! - John, St. Louis
John, for those two bands you won't find a better portable antenna than the Diamond RH77CA. It's 16" long, but if that's not an issue, it will be a worthwhile improvement.

Diamond RH77CA Amateur HT Antenna
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 2:09 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 204
Default

I bought a Watson SuperGainer (W-881?) from Scanner Master, it was a major improvement over the stock antenna.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2009, 8:39 AM
N0IU's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Wentzville, Missouri
Posts: 800
Default

Many years ago I bought a fold-over telescopic antenna with a BNC connector. Of course I don't remember the name brand, but MFJ makes one pretty similar to it. MFJ-1812 The nice thing about the fold-over feature is that you can lay the scanner on its back and position the antenna vertically and not have to worry about knocking the scanner over!
__________________
Scott - NĜIU
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2009, 11:10 AM
Not Posting
   
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottaschultz View Post
Many years ago I bought a fold-over telescopic antenna with a BNC connector. Of course I don't remember the name brand, but MFJ makes one pretty similar to it. MFJ-1812 The nice thing about the fold-over feature is that you can lay the scanner on its back and position the antenna vertically and not have to worry about knocking the scanner over!

Maldol makes one, available from Universal Radio:
Maldol AH-W100RX Scanner Antenna
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2009, 10:58 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5
Default

Wow, that's a lot of great information! You've given me a great start on my research. Thanks everyone!!!!

- John
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2009, 4:35 AM
jclarkr6's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Coles County, Illinois
Posts: 155
Default

I'd recommend the Watson W-889. I own one and it provides great reception on most bands, including the bands you would be monitoring. It's a telescopic antenna so you can adjust the length of the antenna to suit the band you that intend to monitor.

Personally, I would stay away from the Maldol AH-W100RX Antenna. That was my previous antenna, its reception was inferior to the W-889. I also found the construction of the Maldol antenna to be poor. I got the W-889 to replace the Maldol.
__________________
-jclarkr6
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
antenna, pro-97

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions