RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Computer Aided Monitoring and Programming > Software Defined Radio


Software Defined Radio - A forum for general discussion of software defined radio (SDR) receiver equipment.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2014, 2:30 PM
Flatliner's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 389
Default

The website claims "Tracking RF filters" but I don't recall seeing details of them.

On my Winradio G33, I have control over them, but I haven't seen any info regarding Airspy.

There are some SAW filters on my FCD Pro+ which work well.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2014, 11:06 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatliner View Post
The website claims "Tracking RF filters" but I don't recall seeing details of them.

On my Winradio G33, I have control over them, but I haven't seen any info regarding Airspy.

There are some SAW filters on my FCD Pro+ which work well.
Yes, Airspy uses the same tuner-on-a-chip like RTL SDR dongles, the R820T, which incorporates a tracking preselection stage. Such a varactor preselector is good enough for broadcast purposes, but marginal for radio-minded people looking for unknown weak signals.

But then again, Airspy seems more targetted at the "hackers" community, not so much at the DX hunter.
This seems to be the case with many recent wideband SDR hardware; emphasis is clearly on bandwidth without publishing relevant dynamic range specs.

73
Paul
PD0PSB

Last edited by pd0psb; 08-21-2014 at 11:18 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2014, 5:35 PM
vince48's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hayward, CA.
Posts: 772
Default

So, whatever happened to Airspy? Is it in production or......


vince48
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2014, 6:08 PM
Flatliner's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 389
Default

It's not of course, still. I stopped caring anyway after seeing how mouthy the developer is with people.

I have a HackRF now so I couldn't care less anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2014, 7:05 PM
Boatanchor's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 989
Default Mmmm..

Maybe it was all 'AirWare'

By the time these guys get their act together, Funcube will come out with Mk3 and blow them away.
The FC people have already produced two successful commercial SDR receiver products in the last few years. They obviously have the talent to design, build and produce good product that is sold all over the Globe. If they are keen on staying in the marketplace, I'm sure that Mk3 is already on the drawing board, if not at the beta testing stage.

The FCDP+ is a pretty amazing receiver given its size, so I can't wait for the next version. Hopefully, with a wider bandwidth capability.
__________________
What can go wrong, will inevitably go wrong!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2014, 8:13 PM
Not Posting
   
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boatanchor View Post
Maybe it was all 'AirWare'

By the time these guys get their act together, Funcube will come out with Mk3 and blow them away.
The FC people have already produced two successful commercial SDR receiver products in the last few years. They obviously have the talent to design, build and produce good product that is sold all over the Globe. If they are keen on staying in the marketplace, I'm sure that Mk3 is already on the drawing board, if not at the beta testing stage.

The FCDP+ is a pretty amazing receiver given its size, so I can't wait for the next version. Hopefully, with a wider bandwidth capability.
I drool when I see FCDP+ !!!

AirSpy makes me wanna go flame at ppl like youseff!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2014, 8:32 PM
Boatanchor's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 989
Default

I must be showing my age. I had to go and find out what 'Flaming' was.
__________________
What can go wrong, will inevitably go wrong!
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2014, 9:45 PM
Seņor Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,766
Default

Unofficially ...

The AirSpy board design is finalized. The firmware is not. AirSpy has a three-core ARM processor on board; which takes a bit more effort that a single core processor.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2014, 3:46 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 100
Default

Hi Unitrunker,

Do you know if the final design has a preselection stage before the R820T tuner chip?
I would expect at least a HPF to avoid FM broadcast overload.

73
Paul
PD0PSB
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2014, 10:06 PM
Seņor Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,766
Default

I do not know. I expect to see some reviews once ITead starts filling orders.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2014, 6:26 PM
Flatliner's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 389
Default

If there was pre-selection other than what the chip offers internally, he would have made a big deal if it, but it's all been about ADC bit count and bandwidth.

There is quite a bit of imaging on the HackRF, Band II in airband, Flex paging in 2 mtrs etc, being 8 bit doesn't help either, but I've tamed most of it with BPFs and notching. Being able to see a WiFi signal fully, and in real time, is excellent, and not possible with Airspy. Next stop, BladeRF...
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2014, 6:39 PM
vince48's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hayward, CA.
Posts: 772
Default

Flatliner
what are you saying? are you saying HackRF in the air bands is dodo? Please tell us HackRF user how you "tamed" the images.

vince48
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2014, 6:45 PM
Flatliner's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 389
Default

I already said how, by stopping the signal with bandpass filters or notch filters, used externally. Bits of Band II is present in the lower beacon end.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2014, 6:53 PM
vince48's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hayward, CA.
Posts: 772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatliner View Post
I already said how, by stopping the signal with bandpass filters or notch filters, used externally. Bits of Band II is present in the lower beacon end.
OK, thank you Sir
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 09-30-2014, 1:40 PM
Flatliner's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 389
Default

You're welcome.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2014, 7:10 PM
Seņor Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,766
Default

Current best guess for an ETA for AirSpy is (unofficially, unconfirmed, and uncommitted) is late November.

They're still working on the firmware.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2014, 8:21 AM
Flatliner's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 389
Default

It still doesn't work well enough to sell then. By the time it's released, SDR will have become old.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2014, 12:49 AM
Seņor Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,766
Default

Apparently it is slated for late this month ...

Airspy is Coming | ITead Intelligent Systems Blog
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2014, 8:40 AM
jdobbs2001's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 222
Default

November 20, 2017.

Hey anyone heard about the Airspy yet.

Yes, they are working out some final bugs, it is slated for december.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2014, 12:24 PM
Flatliner's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 389
Default

They've been saying that it's "a month or two away" for at least six months now. I can find posts by the dev himself stating that it would be ready in April... May....

It's probably safe to suspect that they can't get it working properly as they've been bashing away at it since 2013.

Last edited by Flatliner; 10-05-2014 at 12:30 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions