RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Computer Aided Monitoring and Programming > Software Defined Radio


Software Defined Radio - A forum for general discussion of software defined radio (SDR) receiver equipment.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2017, 12:29 PM
p1879's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 99
Default the upcoming Airspy HF+

Many of us are excited, I think, over this new SDR that is supposed to reach market soon.

My research shows little mention of it over the last months, and some have voiced dissatisfaction over omission of 6 meters and below to the upper limit to HF. I saw another comment about the VHF high coverage of the unit almost, but not including, a satellite band of interest to the writer.

Perhaps some interest in the project, and some desired changes could be discussed here to prod the Airspy folks along.......

Does anyone have any current news on the alluring new radio?

p1879
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-06-2017, 8:34 PM
Newbie
   
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 1
Default Likewise

I have no info to add, just wanted to echo the OP's sentiments. I currently use an Afedri SDR-Net and an RSP1 and cannot wait to get more specifics on the Airspy HF+. It sounded like something I'll want to add to my shack. I've had one of the 20 dollar dongles and surprisingly didn't give up the hobby after that. Had a Softrock Ensemble 2 that I sold when I got the Afedri. Used to own an ICOM PCR1000 and enjoyed it quite a bit, but it became a bit dated.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2017, 10:07 AM
DaveNF2G's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Rensselaer, NY
Posts: 8,288
Default

Sounds like Airspy has reached the limits of their abilities. Not surprising after they put so much effort into excluding more capable competitor units from their software.
__________________
David T. Stark
NF2G WQMY980 KYR7128
Wondering whether realpoo would be better than shampoo...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2017, 4:32 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveNF2G View Post
Sounds like Airspy has reached the limits of their abilities. Not surprising after they put so much effort into excluding more capable competitor units from their software.
I purchased an AirSpy and SDRplay around the same time several months ago. I use the SDRPlay almost exclusively. My AirSpy is flaky and sometimes requires a power reset.

As much as I am not thrilled with AirSpy, I don't blame them for not creating driver modules for their main competitor. In fact, I think they would be foolish to continue SDRSharp support for SDRPlay.

Brett
N6BY
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2017, 9:29 AM
p1879's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 99
Default

I found a commentary by a Japanese Amateur who speculated that the AirSpy HF+ will sell for about 100$ more than the price mentioned elsewhere. I personally dislike SDR#, however I wish other s/w had plug-ins like those available to SDR# users.

I prefer SDR Console, and what piqued my interest in the new offering was Simon's (creator of SDR Console) comment about the HF+. He seems to think it is a big step up in performance for an inexpensive SDR. Since he is light-years and several Galaxies ahead of me on the subject, that gets my attention.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2017, 10:18 PM
p1879's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 99
Default

RTL-SDR has some illustrations on the new unit-- as of yesterday--and some limited commentary.


First Renderings of the Airspy HF+ Revealed
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2017, 10:36 PM
mancow's Avatar
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: N.E. Kansas
Posts: 5,919
Default

The plugins are what makes SDR# the go to for me. Vasily's fast scanner plugin is amazing. Nothing out there come close.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2017, 10:52 PM
mtindor's Avatar
OH/WV DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Carroll Co OH / EN90LN
Posts: 6,088
Default

The Airspy R1/R2 and Mini have made such a difference in my enjoyment of VHF/UHF+ digital signal acquisition. I can't wait to try out the HF+. I tend to completely disregard anything bad that people may have to say about Youssef. The products he has put out are outstanding, and in my opinion nobody has been able to touch the Airspys for VHF/UHF+ performance even at 5x the price.

Looks like I'll be getting back into the <30 mhz receiving game. Time to plan for some antennas.

Mike
__________________
Mike / AA8IA
PSR800/PRO197/BCD436HP/BCD536HP

If I PM you about a submission, please reply promptly or your submission may be rejected.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2017, 10:56 PM
mancow's Avatar
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: N.E. Kansas
Posts: 5,919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtindor View Post
The Airspy R1/R2 and Mini have made such a difference in my enjoyment of VHF/UHF+ digital signal acquisition. I can't wait to try out the HF+. I tend to completely disregard anything bad that people may have to say about Youssef. The products he has put out are outstanding, and in my opinion nobody has been able to touch the Airspys for VHF/UHF+ performance even at 5x the price.

Looks like I'll be getting back into the <30 mhz receiving game. Time to plan for some antennas.

Mike

I completely agree.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2017, 9:44 PM
p1879's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 99
Default

A bit more information is coming along. The RTL people have this:
New Airspy HF+ Pics and Sensitivity Test
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2017, 8:53 AM
mbott's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 149
Default

As mentioned earlier, my interest in the Airspy HF+ is based on Simon Brown's continued referencing the item in some of his posts/emails. The Airspy HF+ just might be the reason I sell my RSP1 when the time comes.

--
Mike
__________________
Knight Star Roamers Sony ICF-2010 Sangean ATS-909X Icom IC-R75 Tecsun PL-660 Kenwood R-5000 Yaesu FRG-7 SDRplay RSP1&2 JRC NRD-535D CountyComm GP-5
Pixel RF Pro-1B JTD1 discone Wellbrook ALA1530NP
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2017, 12:34 PM
mtindor's Avatar
OH/WV DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Carroll Co OH / EN90LN
Posts: 6,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbott View Post
As mentioned earlier, my interest in the Airspy HF+ is based on Simon Brown's continued referencing the item in some of his posts/emails. The Airspy HF+ just might be the reason I sell my RSP1 when the time comes.

--
Mike
I'm not knocking the Airspy HF+ at all, especially since I don't have one yet. I will definitely be getting one. But you might end up keeping your RSP+ just because you aren't going to get teh same amount of bandwidth available in the Airspy HF+ that you do on an RSP. At least that's my understanding. I think it's limited to looking at someting like 500-768 khz at a time. So if you need to monitor multiple bands at once, you'll probably keep your RSP as well. Plus, the Airspy HF isn't going to be doing UHF+ -- another reason to keep your existing hardware.

I can't wait to get my hands on the Airspy HF

mike
__________________
Mike / AA8IA
PSR800/PRO197/BCD436HP/BCD536HP

If I PM you about a submission, please reply promptly or your submission may be rejected.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2017, 12:47 PM
mbott's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtindor View Post
I'm not knocking the Airspy HF+ at all, especially since I don't have one yet. I will definitely be getting one.
<snip>
I can't wait to get my hands on the Airspy HF

mike
Mike, I have the RSP1 & RSP2. Even if I sell the RSP1, I'm well covered with the other.

--
Mike
__________________
Knight Star Roamers Sony ICF-2010 Sangean ATS-909X Icom IC-R75 Tecsun PL-660 Kenwood R-5000 Yaesu FRG-7 SDRplay RSP1&2 JRC NRD-535D CountyComm GP-5
Pixel RF Pro-1B JTD1 discone Wellbrook ALA1530NP
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2017, 7:57 PM
Member
   
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand
Posts: 75
Default

My way of thinking is that the + indicates something else over and above HF and for me that's just a bonus. As Youseff et al state, this is game changer receiver for HF and for me it certainly will be going by the specs.

As an HF aeronautical monitor, 660kHz bandwidth is way too much, I only need ~200kHz for any aero band so decimation down to that will be perfect.

Don't forget also the possibilities of accessing this receiver via the internet by multiple clients. To be able to listen and tune the receiver outside my home network is another key feature and to be able to do it all via my Raspberry Pi3 using SpyServer is really going to open up possibilities for me, what about you?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions