Anyone else out there use Two Tone Finder? I was doing mass decoding of tone sets, and I went back thru the logs/files and noticed that TTFv01 is not (Apparently) detecting the frequencies appropriately.
At first I thought I just had agencies w/ non-standard tone-sets (would be my luck), then I started generating software based tones, and piping them into TTFv01 via soft cable & hard cable, then using web based & audacity generated tones...and it's pretty far off.
634.5 hZ generated in an online tone generator & audacity get decoded by TTF as 646.68 hz, 707.3 hz gets decoded as 718.08...etc. It's not a regular offset, I'm not sure if it's a frequency variant issue...but when you have some of those tone sets that area equidistant between two possibles on the Moto QC2 list chart, how do I know which is the generated set? The apparent margin for error on detection is pretty wide.
At first I thought I just had agencies w/ non-standard tone-sets (would be my luck), then I started generating software based tones, and piping them into TTFv01 via soft cable & hard cable, then using web based & audacity generated tones...and it's pretty far off.
634.5 hZ generated in an online tone generator & audacity get decoded by TTF as 646.68 hz, 707.3 hz gets decoded as 718.08...etc. It's not a regular offset, I'm not sure if it's a frequency variant issue...but when you have some of those tone sets that area equidistant between two possibles on the Moto QC2 list chart, how do I know which is the generated set? The apparent margin for error on detection is pretty wide.
Last edited: