996XT (&396XT) Carroll Fire

Status
Not open for further replies.

bwhite

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Carroll County, MD
I'm just curious, for those listening to Carroll Fire with a 996XT or 396XT, are you hearing a fair amount of transmissions that are unintelligible,
they come through distorted or only pieces?
When I'm near an actual transceiver I sometimes hear transmissions occur that don't come thru the 996/396 at all. (on an incident I've been monitoring)
Is there a fix for this?
If so, I used FreeScan to program things, I'd be glad to share files or screenshots.
Thanx y'all.
 

Whiskey3JMC

Just another lowly hobbyist
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
8,161
Location
Philly burbs 🇺🇸
I'm just curious, for those listening to Carroll Fire with a 996XT or 396XT, are you hearing a fair amount of transmissions that are unintelligible,
they come through distorted or only pieces?
What you are witnessing is the phenomenon known as simulcast distortion, it's one of the most discussed issues on these forums. Best bet would be to sell the XT radios and get the SDS series radios (100 and or 200). These were designed to combat the effects of simulcast distortion, especially if this is a system you intend to monitor frequently. Although there are a number of workarounds mentioned in the wiki I linked they work for very few people. It all boils down to your location relative to two or more simulcasting towers
 
Last edited:

bwhite

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Carroll County, MD
What you are witnessing is the phenomenon known as simulcast distortion, it's one of the most discussed issues on these forums. Best bet would be to sell the XT radios and get the SDS series radios (100 and or 200). These were designed to combat the effects of simulcast distortion, especially if this is a system you intend to monitor frequently. Although there are a number of workarounds mentioned in the wiki I linked they work for very few people. It all boils down to your location relative to two or more simulcasting towers
Yup, I know about that but does it make sense that this would occur on back to back transmissions from the same unit that hasn’t moved nor has my device moved?
Yes, I’d love to go the SDS route but soon as wifey saw that and the cost the next call coming would be a homicide, mine
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,385
Location
The OP
Yup, I know about that but does it make sense that this would occur on back to back transmissions from the same unit that hasn’t moved nor has my device moved?
Yes, I’d love to go the SDS route but soon as wifey saw that and the cost the next call coming would be a homicide, mine
If you are listening from a fixed position that has a decent computer, there are free / low cost software packages that work with inexpensive SDR USB devices. They typically receive P25 signaling better than previous generations of scanners, and output almost subscriber quality audio. Transmission quality is affected by lots of variables, and the scenario you described is not unusual. All this said, the system design in Carroll County could use more sites considering the rolling terrain.
 
Last edited:

bwhite

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Carroll County, MD
I often use various phone apps and Broadcastify on the computer. My only complaints there are the 1-2 minute audio delay and, because the source scanner is understandably in scan mode, it may get stuck on a transmission on an undesired talk group obstructing the incident that is a priority.
 

tvengr

Well Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
10,747
Location
Baltimore County, MD
Give this file a try. Save the attached zipped file to your computer and extract. Open the extracted file with FreeSCAN and Upload Programming. System quick key is 5.
 

Attachments

  • Carroll Co MD 996.zip
    2.2 KB · Views: 9

bwhite

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Carroll County, MD
Give this file a try. Save the attached zipped file to your computer and extract. Open the extracted file with FreeSCAN and Upload Programming. System quick key is 5.
Thanks. So have you found that this set up receives pretty solidly without a lot of garbling and dropouts?
 

bwhite

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Carroll County, MD
Thanks. So have you found that this set up receives pretty solidly without a lot of garbling and dropouts?
I took a quick scan, the only 2 diffs I see are that I have all the frequencies loaded, in the order specified by the RR database, I think you have just the control freqs (prob a better idea). I also note that on the group screens you specifically selected digital where I left it at all.
Anyway, how has your listening been with this file? If pretty solid I'll give it a try. Thx
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,385
Location
The OP
I took a quick scan, the only 2 diffs I see are that I have all the frequencies loaded, in the order specified by the RR database, I think you have just the control freqs (prob a better idea). I also note that on the group screens you specifically selected digital where I left it at all.
Anyway, how has your listening been with this file? If pretty solid I'll give it a try. Thx
Your issue is the radio, not the programming. Motorola systems only require control channels to be programmed; the data contained in the cch tells the radio which traffic channel is active. Either programming method will have the same end result. You need a radio specifically designed to receive simulcast signaling or a SDR based solution.
 

bwhite

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Carroll County, MD
Your issue is the radio, not the programming. Motorola systems only require control channels to be programmed; the data contained in the cch tells the radio which traffic channel is active. Either programming method will have the same end result. You need a radio specifically designed to receive simulcast signaling or a SDR based solution.
Yeah. I’d love to upgrade but, as mentioned, that would result in my death.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,385
Location
The OP
Yea I get that, but it’s physics that’s killing you, lol. Have you tried listening to the Carroll County Broadcastify feed? It says that the source radio is an XTL1500, and perhaps it is located in a good receive location.
 

bwhite

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Carroll County, MD
Actually the Broadcastify source for Carroll is a direct tap off the dispatch panel. It’s not a scanner
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,385
Location
The OP
I’m only reading what the Broadcastify description says - I have no direct knowledge. (XTL1500 is a Motorola subscriber - could be a control station.)
 

Ronaldski

MI DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
3,107
Location
Bay City MI

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,385
Location
The OP
Kludges *might* work if you are stationary - it's worth the effort. Otherwise, invest in a receiver specifically designed to address the issue..
 

bwhite

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Carroll County, MD
Be sure to have the latest and last really firmware in them, some work was done to help out this issue.


Take a look at

Have they updated in the last year? I checked about this time last year and had the latest. Thanx
 

mikev10

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
58
The source for the Carroll feed is an XTL1500 mobile. I've supplied that feed for 10 years since
I retired as the radio system manager. I'll keep it up as long as I can. It does sound nice. I'd like
to setup another system on the new "CALLS" format which I hope to do in the next few years and
keep both running. I'm sure it won't sound as good as that mobile radio feed as it uses SDR's. That
would give everyone access to all talkgroups.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,385
Location
The OP
Have they updated in the last year? I checked about this time last year and had the latest. Thanx
They just recently updated the firmware to address supply chain issues with parts. It was not to improve functionality.
 

bwhite

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Carroll County, MD
The source for the Carroll feed is an XTL1500 mobile. I've supplied that feed for 10 years since
I retired as the radio system manager. I'll keep it up as long as I can. It does sound nice. I'd like
to setup another system on the new "CALLS" format which I hope to do in the next few years and
keep both running. I'm sure it won't sound as good as that mobile radio feed as it uses SDR's. That
would give everyone access to all talkgroups.
It's been doing a super job Mike. I hope you are enjoying your current climate, I'm jealous.
 

bwhite

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Carroll County, MD
They just recently updated the firmware to address supply chain issues with parts. It was not to improve functionality.
For my 396XT I have 1.11.01 loaded, best I can tell as I hop around Uniden's site this is current.
Looks like 1.07.03 is the current version for the 996xt; I'll check the 996xt in a bit but I'm sure I have this version.
Anyone, feel free to correct me and point me elsewhere if there is something newer. Thanx
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top