A discussion on sync detection

MTScannerNut

Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
135
Location
NW Montana
Very informative article. I have an early production Icom R75 with sync detection. I've been playing with it and if it is making any difference I can hardly tell. On the other hand, the sync detection on my R8600 makes a very noticeable difference and the improvement is easily heard.
 

majoco

Stirrer
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
4,278
Location
New Zealand
I have an ex-Marine Debeg 7313 which was also badge-engineered by Skanti, Hagenuk and Siemens as far as I can gather. It only receives CW, AM or USB. For the USB product detector it uses a TBA120 IC and the carrier insertion frequency of 1.4MHz +/- a little is synthesised somewhere else. However on AM the signal is fed into the input transformer of the product detector but also fed into a limiting amplifier on the same IC which strips off the modulation, amplifies the remaining carrier and applies that to the other input of the product detector - the normal CIO for USB is disabled of course. The AM IF amplifier has a very broad characteristic so combined with the synchronous detection give a fine not-quite-HiFi sound and I have never heard it come out of lock. I have attached the schematic and the explanatory text for info.
 

Attachments

  • Debeg 7313.jpg
    Debeg 7313.jpg
    40.6 KB · Views: 18
  • Clipboard01.jpg
    Clipboard01.jpg
    150.3 KB · Views: 19
  • Clipboard02.jpg
    Clipboard02.jpg
    36.7 KB · Views: 19

mbott

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
707
Location
EN80nd
13dka has written several excellent articles for SWLing.com.

--
Mike
 

Direwolf131

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
68
Very informative article. I have an early production Icom R75 with sync detection. I've been playing with it and if it is making any difference I can hardly tell. On the other hand, the sync detection on my R8600 makes a very noticeable difference and the improvement is easily heard.
You will never realize any true synch performance out of the excellent Icom R75 absent serious mods, mods which come close to the original cost of the receiver itself. On the other hand, you have absolutely no need for a working synch detector on any working R75 as they are absolutely spectacular at capturing all HF/AM signals via ECSS, which in my 45 years has always equaled or exceeded any synch detection circuitry right from the gate!

The R75's stability in SSB is just superb, I listen to all HF/Utility/Broadcast on my R75's via ECSS, one of the greatest utility receivers ever produced, as far as I am concerned synch is a pointless gimmick I have never seen really live up to its vaunted expectations, even on professional sets costing 3-4 X the original cost of an R75.
 

GB46

Active Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2017
Messages
820
The only way to tell that my R75 is in AM synch mode is by the indicator on the LCD, as it makes absolutely no difference in the received signal. It does have give a slight pop when tuning away from lock, but it's useless. On the other hand, the R75's 1 hertz tuning step is very useful for zero beating when using ECSS.

Back in the 90s I had a Sony ICF-2010, and its synch mode greatly reduced the effects of fading. It didn't stay locked on the signal very long, however; I had to retune quite often.
 

GB46

Active Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2017
Messages
820
Meant to mention that mine is an early version of the R75, over 21 years old by now.
 

mbott

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
707
Location
EN80nd
After using my 2010 since '91 and needing to replace the R75 I sold, I did pick up an older R75 with the synch detector. This one didn't have the DSP unit, so that was ordered prior to the radio even shipping to me. Upon receipt, I added the DSP unit and sent it on to Kiwa for their synch detector magic. There is a slight improvement in the signal quality using the synch detector now, but I didn't have it long enough prior to sending on to Kiwa to say it wasn't there before.

As for the 2010, I don't think I've encountered the drifting issue. That synch detector can spoil one. :)

--
Mike
 

GB46

Active Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2017
Messages
820
As for the 2010, I don't think I've encountered the drifting issue. That synch detector can spoil one. :)
I no longer have mine, but while I did, I discovered a little trick with the synch detector quite by accident:

After tuning in a USB signal, I inadvertently switched the radio to synch AM. Out of curiosity I started fiddling with the tuning dial, and actually managed to clarify the signal with more pleasant audio than I ever got in USB mode. People I shared this with contradicted me, claiming it couldn't have worked, due to the absence of a carrier in sideband signals, but I know it worked for me. My guess is that the 2010's AM synch must have been injecting a carrier of its own, and producing the same effect as ECSS.
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,361
Location
Bowie, Md.
That is pretty much how sync is supposed to work - basically put, it's replacing the carrier that was originally received and detected with one internally created which is more stable and free of fading effects. But how well it works is a very touch and go thing- some manufacturers do it right, others....

Mike
 

bearcatrp

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,496
Location
Land of 10,000 taxes
You will never realize any true synch performance out of the excellent Icom R75 absent serious mods, mods which come close to the original cost of the receiver itself

Can you elaborate on this? Just bought a used R75. What serious mods?
 

mbott

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
707
Location
EN80nd
You will never realize any true synch performance out of the excellent Icom R75 absent serious mods, mods which come close to the original cost of the receiver itself

Can you elaborate on this? Just bought a used R75. What serious mods?

The Synch-AM mode on the Icom R75 was only available on the early production models. Not sure exactly when that was no longer available on the R75. Later models don't include it. Instead, they had the UT-106 DSP unit installed. I don't believe that there is a way to upgrade a later model with Synch-AM. I believe Icom dropped the Synch-AM in the early- to mid-2000s.

--
Mike
 
Last edited:

13dka

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2021
Messages
35
Location
Germany (coast)
The Synch-AM mode on the Icom R75 was only available on the early production models. Not sure exactly when that was no longer available on the R75. Later models don't include it.

Sorry for necroposting but there's a plausible and quite interesting explanation for that: In the comment section of my article, Robert Sillett points out:

Sony added sync detection to the ICF-2010 and subsequent receivers because their multi-mode AM Stereo IC performed that function for AM Stereo in the Kahn-Hazeltine mode. [...] Icom even used the Sony AM Stereo chip in its IC-R75 receiver for its sync detection. The performance of sync on the IC-R75 pales in comparison to Sony receivers, so Icom appears to use different logic for detection. At some point, the supply of these chips disappeared. So Icom revised the design to not include sync. So the older models actually have more features.
 

db_gain

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
100
Regarding the R75 synchro, one of the reasons it sounds identical to standard am detection is the same chip is used for the mode. When not in synchro mode the detector uses a quasi or synchrodyne mode and it's fairly decent at it. Unmodified, the 75 am synchro mode can add distortion at times, or do other weird things. There are mods that can be done to a 75 with synchro that can improve things a bit in synch mode, these can be found on the innernet. Also, the synchro chip in the 75 is a motorola one, not sony.
 

13dka

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2021
Messages
35
Location
Germany (coast)
I see, Sony used a CX857 and it was Grundig who used that chip in the Satellit 500 and -700. Icom apparently used an MC13022.

Here's a video (I think) demonstrating the problem you mentioned:


If that's not just a malfunctioning unit it sounds like it doesn't do anything at all at the spots where it's supposed to mitigate the carrier attenuation distortion. Unfortunately they don't switch to regular AM for comparison, would've been interesting.
 
Top