Ad hoc decentralized communication/HF

Status
Not open for further replies.

kb5udf

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Messages
819
Location
Louisiana
Events which have transpired since 8/29/05, have convinced me of the continued
viability of HF communication systems and networks, and here's why.

On the day of the storm, I was assisting with the operation of the ham station at Natl. Wx. svc, Jackson. For a time that day, my understanding is that for the entire New Orleans region, the only outside communications Louisiana State Police had was ONE ham with an HF rig. Many anxious cell phone calls from trapped suvivors were relayed through various ham channels to this operator.

In last two days, many other urgent requests begin to trickle in from the gulf coast via hf. Phone lines, cell towers, and much radio system infrastructure in these areas were destroyed. But hams begin to return to the air the day after the storm (a few that day!) via HF.

Today and yesterday, many urgent requests for food, water, and generators (usually for public water systems) were passed to our state emergency management agency from county EOC's, via hams on HF.

Even though HF nets can be a bit slow, clunky, noisy, and downright fatiguing to work on, they are exceedingly robust. Survive, string up a wire, and hook up a battery, and with 100 watts you can cover several states.

Similarly the NAWAS system, from my observations, was also fairly robust, and used a great deal, during the storm, and in the aftermath. However, I'm not sure if it was continuously operational in some of the hardest hit areas during the storm.

On a personal note, it is a most unusual feeling to have someone ask you for emergency rations for 15,000, and 120KW of generators for their water supply so they can drink.

So why the title?

It was my summary statement to a FEMA cameraman/interviewer today who asked probing and relavant questions about why I thought HAM communications were being successful during this disaster, when other far more elaborate communication systems were failing.
 

kb5udf

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Messages
819
Location
Louisiana
ad hoc

Well by ad hoc I mean thrown together and making do, for a limited period oftime.

Courtesty of Webster's they define adhoc as:

"for the particular end or case at hand without consideration of wider application"

The NWS Slidell crew who managed to communicate on the hurricane net
of 14.325 the day of the storm after their building was damaged, did so by means of HF gear they were able to redeploy after their primary location was damaged.

The fact that I assisted many different agencies this week onsite, despite never having met any persons there previously or set foot in them, and may never again, also seems to fit what ad-hoc means.

By decentralized I do not mean to imply an absence of command and control. Rather HF does not require a central location, or significant infrastructure. Due to the relatively reliable ability for a minimal station (100 watts and a wire strung up), to communicate in a 500+ mile radiius.

Despite the effectiveness of these HF nets, they have definate limitations, such as fluctuations in signal strength and fatiguing noise levels. They work, but I don't think anyone really wants to rely on such systems for communcation forever. Hence fitting the first part of the above provided definition of adhoc.

I don't know if this answers the 'what what.' But I'll do my best to answer any questions about my post.
 
Last edited:

EricCottrell

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
2,414
Location
Boston, Ma
Hello,

I was listening to the 20M Hurricane net when the NHC was communicating with NWS Slidell as to their situation.

I get the impression that some people and groups think that HF is passe and turn to high tech solutions. I have seen time after time where cellphones and wire phones go down around a disaster area. They are damaged, destroyed, or overloaded.

I think one reason hams can be very effective in emergency communications is that they are decentralized and numerous. There are hams that have the knowledge, equipment, and drive to put something on the air. They are nearby so the response time is reduced. Hams have several means of communications. HF has problems but it is possible to get around most problems. The advantages of HF are the range, the number of stations, and the frequency bands available.

My local NWS uses hams for Skywarn and I get the impression that NWS finds Hams very useful. Hams prove they are useful in emergencies.

I almost forgot to thank you for your time and effort. Thank You for assisting in this disaster.

73 Eric
 
Last edited:

kb5udf

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Messages
819
Location
Louisiana
HF lapse of abilites and equipment

I agree with your analysis of many considering HF as passe. From my asking around
it seems many governmental agencies, except for those that maintain a hamshack, have no HF equipment, or if they do, don't really know how to use it, or maintain it. Why many hams who have never met, talked or even drilled together seem to be communicating more effectively than many government entities will no doubt be the subject of further study (FEMA already interviewed me regarding this)

Before this disaster I knew very few of my fellow hams in Jackson, as this is not my original home. I have since found that there was an initial deficit in HF qualified hams. Many of the members had vhf/uhf priviledges only. Although they were very useful, this did place limits on what they were trained to do. I suspect many of these folks will be upgrading ASAP.

Less than 10 min ago, i heard a bulletin on the local CAP1 channel asking for any hams/cap in N.O. area to assist USCG on CAP freqs. Most of the CAP folks I know are hams.

We'll be busy for some time.

Jean
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top