ADRIAN, Mich. -- A Sheriff's Department radio communications were broadcast over an Internet militia-run radio station during a March 28 search for a member of a Christian militia group accused of plotting to kill police.
Idiots.ADRIAN, Mich. -- A Sheriff's Department radio communications were broadcast over an Internet militia-run radio station during a March 28 search for a member of a Christian militia group accused of plotting to kill police.
I know I'm going to get attacked for saying this, but I want to point out something that should be painfully obvious: what they did is really no different than what the live stream section of RadioReference is doing. However, I don't know if the militia radio site was broadcasting a tactical-only channel, which is forbidden in the RadioReference TOS.ADRIAN, Mich. -- A Sheriff's Department radio communications were broadcast over an Internet militia-run radio station during a March 28 search for a member of a Christian militia group accused of plotting to kill police.
exactly , the more & more high profile exposure of , streaming law enforcement comms & media mentioningIdiots.
It's exactly this sort of jackassery that leads to encryption, laws banning internet access to scanners, and suspicious looks and uncomfortable questions from authorities whenever they see a scanner. Thanks loads, Militia kooks. Way to go. :roll:
-AZ
No, it's worthy for discussion. I was simply stating both sides of the argument for the sake of objective discussion. Until the day they reveal if it was the dispatch channels, general usage channels, or channels exclusively and exclusively tagged as tactical channels that they were broadcasting, this comparison is fair game."However, I don't know if the militia radio site was broadcasting a tactical-only channel, which is forbidden in the RadioReference TOS."
See? There you go so toss that bit of comparison out the window before it stinks up the place.
Consider this however, the stream was about a militia and provided by a militia so chat it up to your heart's content, brains need not be involved, no thought required.
You won't get attacked - we all realize you are joking.I know I'm going to get attacked for saying this, but I want to point out something that should be painfully obvious: what they did is really no different than what the live stream section of RadioReference is doing
Would the court really view RadioReference and militiaradio.com as equals, as the same? If RadioReference and militiaradio.com were both streaming the same transmissions, would one site be less evil than the other? The courts were designed in such a way as to not give preferential treatment in any manner.You won't get attacked - we all realize you are joking.
Comparing the streaming of a channel on the Internet for Joe Citizen in Podunk, Iowa to listen is NOWHERE NEAR the same as an illegal radio station offering an illegal broadcast of the communications for Joe Michigan Militia Idiot to listen to on his radio.
Fortunately this was just traffic control points and the like, so nothing really worrisome.
But thinking what they is no different that RR? That's funny.
So you don't make this mistake again - I suggest perusing the law about radio station transmissions and compare it to the legality of Internet streaming.
Did they have an agreement?As far as I know, the feed they were broadcasting was straight from RadioReference.com
Now THAT is funny stuff. Especially for a brand new poster...They were not attempting to assist any fugitives, they were trying to find out what the hell was going on.
Isn't that what was said a few days back?Rather He was broadcasting the feed from this site
So he did it illegally, without an agreement from RR. No surprise there, and no heart-breakingAs far as I know, the feed they were broadcasting was straight from RadioReference.com