Amateur Extra

Status
Not open for further replies.

mass-man

trying to retire...
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
1,987
Reaction score
753
Location
Parker Co., TX
Congrats...start a new thread as you progress thru the 6 mtr AM repeater project! Tried that a couple of years ago but could find no one else interested...we moved on up to 902 FM to get away from 2 mtrs. Now that is hugely popular here in Dallas, so we are thinking of moving to 222 mhz. Couple of good repeaters and I can go days without hearing anyone but the one friend who went ahead and bought a 222 rig.
 

AC9KH

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
257
Reaction score
117
Location
Northern Wisconsin
Congrats...start a new thread as you progress thru the 6 mtr AM repeater project!

Thanks, and will do. I had to get my shack together in a hurry tonight with a new ticket. Talked to a fellow in Australia for about a half hour on 40 meters, and a couple others that were just trying to make contact, then say 73......next.

I'm putting the repeater project on hold until the holidays are done. Hard to concentrate when my wife is after me every 5 minutes to do something.

I suppose a photo of my shack is in order with a new ticket and all. Talked to the fellow in Australia on the IC-7200. Talked to the other folks with the FT-757 GX Mark II. Both rigs work pretty good and just pushing 100 watts into an 80 meter resonant inverted V dipole. Although that IC-7200 puts out about 115-120 with the speech compressor turned on. Have to get a desktop mic. The hand mics are kind of in the way when I'm trying to write stuff down.
 

Attachments

  • 100_4829.JPG
    100_4829.JPG
    82.5 KB · Views: 395

N0IU

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2009
Messages
802
Reaction score
2
Location
Wentzville, Missouri
Have to get a desktop mic. The hand mics are kind of in the way when I'm trying to write stuff down.

First of all, congratulations!

Your shack looks really nice too, btw.

As far as the mic, one thing you might want to consider is a mic on a swing arm and operate it with a foot switch:

shack_zpsc554ba0d.jpg


It doesn't have to be anything elaborate. I "re-purposed" an old swing arm lamp and it holds a Heil PR-781 just fine. This way, I can push it up out of the way leaving the entire work surface free. The foot switch is a musician's keyboard sustain pedal. A decent one is only about $20 and they are made to withstand a moderate amount of abuse.

Some people also prefer to use headsets with a boom mic attached, but personally I find them to get a bit claustrophobic after awhile but they do have the advantage of always having the mic right where you need it.
 

AC9KH

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
257
Reaction score
117
Location
Northern Wisconsin
It doesn't have to be anything elaborate. I "re-purposed" an old swing arm lamp and it holds a Heil PR-781 just fine.

I like that idea. I have one of those lamp arms around here someplace. If I remember correctly, it was sort of worn out. But I could probably tighten it up and lubricate it and use it for a mic mount.

Thanks!
 

kc5qih

Amateur Radio Operator and Scanning Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
Location
Waco, Texas
I like that idea. I have one of those lamp arms around here someplace. If I remember correctly, it was sort of worn out. But I could probably tighten it up and lubricate it and use it for a mic mount.

Thanks!

If I used more phone i'd probably invest in one of those setups...i need to get the EQ settings on my FT-950 right I guess to begin with. Apparently my lows are too low, lol. My upgrade finally showed in the system today so nore more /AE for me

Chris
KC5QIH
 

AC9KH

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
257
Reaction score
117
Location
Northern Wisconsin
If I used more phone i'd probably invest in one of those setups...i need to get the EQ settings on my FT-950 right I guess to begin with. Apparently my lows are too low, lol. My upgrade finally showed in the system today so nore more /AE for me

Congrats on your upgrade as well!

Was talking to the guys on our local 80m rag chew net last night and the MJF-299 comes highly recommended for all-around use. It's not an expensive mic and will interface with both my Yaesu and ICOM rigs with a homemade switch box. Three guys on the net got them and they sound pretty nice, as they have a 4 band audio equalizer that can be adjusted to fit your voice and the normal levels that you talk at.

I know Heil audio equipment is top of the line stuff. But the general consensus among the guys on the net was that you don't necessarily need the top-of-the-line when "good enough" is more than adequate.
 

nn6ee

Member
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Honestly Gentlemen I wholeheartedly congratulate all new inductees no matter what their amateur license status, BUT I wonder if I'm the ONLY LONG-TIME LICENSEE out here who thinks that the "EXTRA" was MADE TO EASY??? I say that because apparently what really would separate the "Men from the Boys" when concerns the "EXTRA (#1 TICKET) was to MAKE IT AS HARD AS POSSIBLE!!! RIGHT??? I mean if it's the "TOP OF THE LINE LICENSE" it should be kept tough, but yet with the EXTRA (NO CODE) requirement then IT'S NOT TOUGH anymore!!! Tech or General class not requiring CW I've got no problem there, BUT AGAIN without the CW requirement it seems to have made it easier for many! I'm a ADVANCED CLASS and am happy with it since 1968 and wouldn't upgrade anyway because I've accomplished everything I've wanted out of our HOBBY without the "EXTRA" and am PROFICIENT @ 35WPM (CW) anyway because it was another MODE WORTH LEARNING!!!
 

K7MEM

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
432
Reaction score
108
Location
Swartz Creek, Michigan
Honestly Gentlemen I wholeheartedly congratulate all new inductees no matter what their amateur license status, BUT I wonder if I'm the ONLY LONG-TIME LICENSEE out here who thinks that the "EXTRA" was MADE TO EASY??? I say that because apparently what really would separate the "Men from the Boys" when concerns the "EXTRA (#1 TICKET) was to MAKE IT AS HARD AS POSSIBLE!!! RIGHT??? I mean if it's the "TOP OF THE LINE LICENSE" it should be kept tough, but yet with the EXTRA (NO CODE) requirement then IT'S NOT TOUGH anymore!!! Tech or General class not requiring CW I've got no problem there, BUT AGAIN without the CW requirement it seems to have made it easier for many! I'm a ADVANCED CLASS and am happy with it since 1968 and wouldn't upgrade anyway because I've accomplished everything I've wanted out of our HOBBY without the "EXTRA" and am PROFICIENT @ 35WPM (CW) anyway because it was another MODE WORTH LEARNING!!!

I guess it all depends on your point of view.

I've looked at the written tests, since I had to take them, and don't find them any harder, or easier, then when I took them. In fact, the tests are very much like when I took them because, I took the Advanced and Extra back to back, in a single session. But for me, the hard part was getting my CW speed up. I was already an engineer for a long time, so I didn't devote much time to the written tests.

However, there are a lot of potential hams that are not very technically oriented. Hams come from all walks of life (the butcher, the baker, the candle stick maker). In fact, in the early days of 2 meters I use to regularly talk to a ham that operated from his bakery, while his bread was rising. To these guys, the written tests may seem grueling. But I don't think the test should be so hard that these people are exempted from obtaining a ham license. Amateur radio is not trying to make engineers. That's the job of the colleges.

When they were testing for everything, there were a lot of hams denied the "TOP OF THE LINE LICENSE", just because their CW skills were not up to snuff. I know this because, when I took the 20 WPM test, the other 6 or 7 hams that tested with me, all failed. Some were testing for the second and third time. And these were all hams that had already passed the written part and had the technical ability. Personally, I am glad that they finally got the chance to reach their goal.

I'm glad you are happy with your current license class. I was quite happy with a Novice license for over 30 years. I liked CW and had plenty of band space to suit my needs. But at one point (1999) I wanted to go for the top license. It was a personal thing. I could feel at the time that it wasn't going to be long before the Morse testing went away. Once I put my mind to it, it only took 6 months.

Martin - K7MEM
 

03msc

RF is RF
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
4,223
Reaction score
1,289
Location
The Natural State
Honestly Gentlemen I wholeheartedly congratulate all new inductees no matter what their amateur license status, BUT I wonder if I'm the ONLY LONG-TIME LICENSEE out here who thinks that the "EXTRA" was MADE TO EASY??? I say that because apparently what really would separate the "Men from the Boys" when concerns the "EXTRA (#1 TICKET) was to MAKE IT AS HARD AS POSSIBLE!!! RIGHT??? I mean if it's the "TOP OF THE LINE LICENSE" it should be kept tough, but yet with the EXTRA (NO CODE) requirement then IT'S NOT TOUGH anymore!!! Tech or General class not requiring CW I've got no problem there, BUT AGAIN without the CW requirement it seems to have made it easier for many! I'm a ADVANCED CLASS and am happy with it since 1968 and wouldn't upgrade anyway because I've accomplished everything I've wanted out of our HOBBY without the "EXTRA" and am PROFICIENT @ 35WPM (CW) anyway because it was another MODE WORTH LEARNING!!!

No need to yell...we're all (relatively) friendly here.

Welcome to the forums (I see it says that was your first post). This site is a great resource and environment to frequent!
 

ab3a

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Messages
347
Reaction score
33
Location
Lisbon MD
Honestly Gentlemen I wholeheartedly congratulate all new inductees no matter what their amateur license status, BUT I wonder if I'm the ONLY LONG-TIME LICENSEE out here who thinks that the "EXTRA" was MADE TO EASY??? I say that because apparently what really would separate the "Men from the Boys" when concerns the "EXTRA (#1 TICKET) was to MAKE IT AS HARD AS POSSIBLE!!! RIGHT??? I mean if it's the "TOP OF THE LINE LICENSE" it should be kept tough, but yet with the EXTRA (NO CODE) requirement then IT'S NOT TOUGH anymore!!! Tech or General class not requiring CW I've got no problem there, BUT AGAIN without the CW requirement it seems to have made it easier for many! I'm a ADVANCED CLASS and am happy with it since 1968 and wouldn't upgrade anyway because I've accomplished everything I've wanted out of our HOBBY without the "EXTRA" and am PROFICIENT @ 35WPM (CW) anyway because it was another MODE WORTH LEARNING!!!

There will always be old timers who think that something is way too easy for these young whippersnappers. I was licensed under the 20 WPM test rules. I took the test when I was 14. And even today, I can still copy code at 25 WPM. I had to study math that I wasn't supposed to have in school for another two years. And yet, in many ways, I was clueless. I assure you that I was no more ethical about my use of the radio spectrum.

At the end of the day, that's what this is about. It is not an exercise in hazing people so that only a few can glow in the dark with their nerdy ham radio intensity. It is merely a license to practice and learn, while being a decent citizen and user of the spectrum.

Like any other license, it is not about proficiency. It's about ensuring that you know enough to stay out of trouble.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top