At one point in my life I understood the delegation stuff (I think I remember using it on the Ohio MARCS system back when it was type II). I forgot how/when to use it though and just don't understand why it is even necessary. P25 systems give out a tremendous amount of information, and I think enough info is given out on the control channel that UT should be able to determine everything without delegation. Just my thoughts on it. I haven't used UT in years though.I fixed this. When I start Unitrunker it always shows 1F9 delegated to FFF-FFFFFF. I have to manually select 1F9 and delegate it to 1F8 before I decode anything on either system. That makes Unitrunker behave properly but for some reason it won't save it.
Thanks, Tom. Great work with Fort Cobb. That has been an oustanding ? for some time. Glad to see it filled in completely.Good band opening to the north right now.
I can decode site 22 Elk City & 27 Hinton.
There was some activity on 22 and I added the TGs to the wiki.
Confirmed site 9 Ft. Cobb really exists. All I could get was the CC 854.7125 NAC 009 with old DSD+. Not strong enough for Unitrunker.
Yep, that is definitely an odd one -- not only is 855.1375 not part of the Hinton site license, BUT it is currently advertised as an alternate CC on Fort Cobb (a direct neighbor of Hinton). Either somebody fat-fingered things when setting up, or the stole a freq from a neighboring site for some other reason. Who knows. But IF fort Cobb actually could switch to 855.1375, that would likely present a problem for roamers between Fort Cobb and Hinton.I got a full decode on 1F9-009-009 Fort Cobb, OK and submitted an update. It was showing
Also I got it's neghbor 24 miles to the north 027-027 Hinton for the first time. It was showing
This is another case where some frequencies don't match with FCC licenses.
I moved it back to the Radio Maintenance cat, which is a systemwide cat.This TG is under AEP Ohio but I logged it on one of the Oklahoma sites.
2701 a8d T TECH 2701 System technicians Utilities
It's probably systemwide then.There probably needs to be a systemwide subcategory.