Antenna

Status
Not open for further replies.

ryolsen8

Active Member
Feed Provider
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
583
Reaction score
93
Location
BEE07
Hey All,

Not quite sure if this is the place I should be posting this, but I am not sure where else to do it!

I got an Antenna from a friend, no cables, just the antenna - I would like to get it up and running for use, if it works. I am not sure what to do next as far as what connections to get, cables, etc etc.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • photo 1.JPG
    photo 1.JPG
    177.2 KB · Views: 577
  • photo 2.JPG
    photo 2.JPG
    102.3 KB · Views: 556
  • photo 3.JPG
    photo 3.JPG
    147.6 KB · Views: 529
  • photo 4.JPG
    photo 4.JPG
    184.1 KB · Views: 592
  • photo 5.JPG
    photo 5.JPG
    149.6 KB · Views: 591

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,955
Reaction score
34,843
Location
United States
You'll need to get a 300 ohm to 75 ohm balun to convert from the wing nut'd terminals to your coax. Connect the two pieces of silver colored rod with the eyes on the end to the wing nut terminals along with the balun. For your scanner, some good RG-6 coaxial cable will work fine.

Ideally you would want to turn the antenna 90 degrees on the mount to switch it to vertical polarization. You'll need a drill with a 1/4 inch bit to drill new holes on the boom. Just use one of the brackets as a template.

That should work well as a basic UHF/VHF scanner antenna. Good score.
 

ryolsen8

Active Member
Feed Provider
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
583
Reaction score
93
Location
BEE07
Thank you.. I am not knowledgable on the antenna, coax wires, or anyhing you really said I need there... Can you post a link to where Id need to get each of those things? I live close to a radio shack...
 

ryolsen8

Active Member
Feed Provider
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
583
Reaction score
93
Location
BEE07
You'll need to get a 300 ohm to 75 ohm balun to convert from the wing nut'd terminals to your coax. Connect the two pieces of silver colored rod with the eyes on the end to the wing nut terminals along with the balun. For your scanner, some good RG-6 coaxial cable will work fine.

Ideally you would want to turn the antenna 90 degrees on the mount to switch it to vertical polarization. You'll need a drill with a 1/4 inch bit to drill new holes on the boom. Just use one of the brackets as a template.

That should work well as a basic UHF/VHF scanner antenna. Good score.

Google what you said I needed.. I now understand, thanks again!
 

n5ims

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
3,993
Reaction score
303
Thank you.. I am not knowledgable on the antenna, coax wires, or anyhing you really said I need there... Can you post a link to where Id need to get each of those things? I live close to a radio shack...

You'll need to get a 300 ohm to 75 ohm balun to convert from the wing nut'd terminals to your coax. Connect the two pieces of silver colored rod with the eyes on the end to the wing nut terminals along with the balun.

What he called "balun", Radio Shack calls a "transformer". This should be what you need. --> Indoor/Outdoor Matching Transformer : Antenna Transformers | RadioShack.com

For your scanner, some good RG-6 coaxial cable will work fine.

Here is one of the lengths of coax (they go from about 1 foot all the way to 100', perhaps even longer. Get the length you need based on what they have available. RadioShack RG-6 Coaxial Cable (Black) : Coaxial Cables | RadioShack.com

You'll probably also need one of these adapters (Standard F Connector to BNC Jack : F Connectors | RadioShack.com) to change from the supplied "F" connector on the coax to a "BNC" for your scanner (the scanner end may be different since some don't use a "BNC" but use a "SMA" instead, get the adapter for the connection type your scanner has". If you're not sure, bring your scanner with you and have the sales person match it for you.
 

thomasbillman1

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 9, 2012
Messages
497
Reaction score
34
Location
Mesa
Coax

Just a suggestion, If your looking to use this antenna for long term, Get some good coax unless you live in the city. If your not in the city then stay away from all rg cable and spend a little money on LMR coax. The lost is very few with this cable. With LMR300 which is what I am using and I live 45 miles out of phoenix and 116 miles from Tuscan. I can pick Rural Metro up from Tuscan , with the rg6 and the rg 59 my radius is about 50 miles. Now if your in the city you don't even need and out door antenna because you may get whats call a front end over load. This is like having no antenna at all.
 

ryolsen8

Active Member
Feed Provider
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
583
Reaction score
93
Location
BEE07
Just a suggestion, If your looking to use this antenna for long term, Get some good coax unless you live in the city. If your not in the city then stay away from all rg cable and spend a little money on LMR coax. The lost is very few with this cable. With LMR300 which is what I am using and I live 45 miles out of phoenix and 116 miles from Tuscan. I can pick Rural Metro up from Tuscan , with the rg6 and the rg 59 my radius is about 50 miles. Now if your in the city you don't even need and out door antenna because you may get whats call a front end over load. This is like having no antenna at all.

I live in Rural Area.. I will most likely try the antenna out in the Attic first and see if that helps reception.
 

LtDoc

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
2,145
Reaction score
9
Location
Oklahoma
I think if you have the option, the best place for that antenna would be to mount it as high as possible outdoors. A fairly low loss feed line of the proper impedance would be very nice. More than likely you could probably get away with using 75 ohm coax. That assumes that you will only be monitoring, not transmitting. Impedance is much more important to a transmitter than to a receiver.
That antenna appears to be a combination of several antennas in a sort of log-periodic type feed system. Unless you have a means of measuring the input impedance at various frequencies you really have no idea what it may be. Until you have reason to think it requires a balun/transformer, don't bother with trying to pick the right one, you can't, unless you buy several and try them each out.
Try the thing! Until you do, all of this is just conjecture with no basis to go on.
- 'Doc
 

ryolsen8

Active Member
Feed Provider
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
583
Reaction score
93
Location
BEE07
I think if you have the option, the best place for that antenna would be to mount it as high as possible outdoors. A fairly low loss feed line of the proper impedance would be very nice. More than likely you could probably get away with using 75 ohm coax. That assumes that you will only be monitoring, not transmitting. Impedance is much more important to a transmitter than to a receiver.
That antenna appears to be a combination of several antennas in a sort of log-periodic type feed system. Unless you have a means of measuring the input impedance at various frequencies you really have no idea what it may be. Until you have reason to think it requires a balun/transformer, don't bother with trying to pick the right one, you can't, unless you buy several and try them each out.
Try the thing! Until you do, all of this is just conjecture with no basis to go on.
- 'Doc

Correct, monitoring, not transmitting.. Thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top