• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Any channel plan for FM?

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
2,191
Location
Southwest, IL
Nope, nothing at all on 25. If it makes you CB'ers feel better I just got yelled at on a ham repeater. I was using a DMR repeater on a talk group that had not made a peep all day. A friend of mine called me on it to test his radio and in less than 60 seconds Mr. Repeater Police started giving us a warning. And we wonder why ham radio is dying.
Warning for what exactly. I'm confused here.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,904
Reaction score
13,445
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
One way to push this forward is to have Congress mandate all CB radios be capable of AM, FM, and SSB after a certain date to be legally sold in the United States. Before everyone loses their heads, we did it with mandating UHF TV channels be added to television sets, we did it by mandating 40 channel CB radios and not 23 channels once the additional frequencies were approved, we did it with baby monitors and Part 15 walkie-talkies moving to 49 MHz, and we did it with the 1610-1700 kHz expanded band that was added to AM radio receivers once that proposal passed muster. There is always a transition period with any new or updated technology, but I'm not sure most manufacturers will sign on, nor will users voluntarily upgrade unless there is a legal nudge from Uncle Sam. After the initial faux hysteria it will become commonplace and no one will have an issue with it.
The gubament has their fingers in way too many things, why would you want them to dictate what features my CB must have? That's almost as bad as my guber-ner with his mandate that says I can't buy a gasoline powered vehicle after 2035 in my state.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
4,098
Reaction score
4,067
Location
Fort Worth
One way to push this forward is to have Congress mandate all CB radios be capable of AM, FM, and SSB after a certain date to be legally sold in the United States. Before everyone loses their heads, we did it with mandating UHF TV channels be added to television sets, we did it by mandating 40 channel CB radios and not 23 channels once the additional frequencies were approved, we did it with baby monitors and Part 15 walkie-talkies moving to 49 MHz, and we did it with the 1610-1700 kHz expanded band that was added to AM radio receivers once that proposal passed muster. There is always a transition period with any new or updated technology, but I'm not sure most manufacturers will sign on, nor will users voluntarily upgrade unless there is a legal nudge from Uncle Sam. After the initial faux hysteria it will become commonplace and no one will have an issue with it.

Spec change a good idea.

SSB/FM makes sense for plenty of uses currently ignored

Doesn’t make old ones functionally obsolete, either.

The tiny version AM/FM/SSB almost upon us:
AQUARIO RP70 Mini
IMG_9216.jpeg
Not one I’ll recommend as there’s a limit involving usefulness & size. Also not cheap.

It’d be great to instead have a detachable faceplate type. Which the proposed change would foster.

.
 

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
2,191
Location
Southwest, IL
Multiple people I know and talk to have used FM long before it was ok to do so and or may or may not have been in the actual CB band in this country. 26.805 has been used for along time now that I can recall on FM, and there were quite a few people on it even dating back some years ago now. Obviously we were using modified ham gear to get there. Given FM has been around a long time on the import type radios and so have amplifiers, a little power on FM beyond what the legal CB's provide is honestly great for local or even DX coms.

The scope of a lot of CB type conversations always seem to lean to the export type radios these days. Unless you're using them honestly on 10 (or 12 if it's included) meters they're just as illegal on CB as anything else is including the 100 (or in some cases 200) watt ham stuff.
What many of ham transceivers lacked was that stupidly loud audio on AM, and at that, many could be modified or properly adjusted to provide good AM Modulation, dating back to the tube type stuff.
If not, maybe 25 is becoming the nationwide FM channel?
This is interesting I've never honestly checked that exact frequency or at least not in a number of years. I'll stick that in my HF rig and see if it picks up stuff on occasion, that would be neat honestly.
 

K6GBW

Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
994
Reaction score
1,730
Location
Montebello, CA
Warning for what exactly. I'm confused here.
He admonished us for using an open system that has multiple linked repeaters. He suggested we could use a local talk group. Problem was we weren’t in range of the same repeater. That, and we were literally doing a test that took less than a minute. I’ll never understand these guys that hoard frequencies and build a huge system and then get upset when someone actually uses it. The whole idea just seems to go against the amateur ethos to me.
 

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
2,191
Location
Southwest, IL
He admonished us for using an open system that has multiple linked repeaters. He suggested we could use a local talk group. Problem was we weren’t in range of the same repeater. That, and we were literally doing a test that took less than a minute. I’ll never understand these guys that hoard frequencies and build a huge system and then get upset when someone actually uses it. The whole idea just seems to go against the amateur ethos to me.
Agreed. Let's just put it up and let it sit there. I told people all the time in the late 90s, when I had my repeater system on the air, the greatest compliment you can give me is use the thing! It was a linked system, analog, all RF linked and I didn't care if they were talking from Joplin MO to up by Vandalia IL or using their stuff locally. It was all good. I didn't go thru all that effort to just have it sit there.
 

W8UU

Pilot of the Airwaves
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
463
Reaction score
515
Location
Wellston OH
Spec change a good idea.
SSB/FM makes sense for plenty of uses currently ignored.
Doesn’t make old ones functionally obsolete, either.

Exactly. What's out there now will not be obsolete. New all-mode CB radios just make sense now that it's not 1964 and we're not operating with front mount crystals for transmit and variable tuners for receive. This is unlikely to happen with today's deregulation-minded FCC, unless Motorola or another large corporate electronics manufacturer thought it would be a good idea. In that case, Congress would have a new law on their desks and an NRPM would be drafted before you could say Make CB Radio Great Again.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,904
Reaction score
13,445
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
He admonished us for using an open system that has multiple linked repeaters. He suggested we could use a local talk group. Problem was we weren’t in range of the same repeater. That, and we were literally doing a test that took less than a minute. I’ll never understand these guys that hoard frequencies and build a huge system and then get upset when someone actually uses it. The whole idea just seems to go against the amateur ethos to me.
You wouldn't be talking about the Winsystem would you? At one time I could see six different repeaters key up on that massive bloated system covering the same area. What a horrible waste of repeater pairs where there is otherwise no way for anyone to get a repeater pair in So Cal. A long time ago it was an interesting system and seemed to work ok but now it only serves itself.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
4,098
Reaction score
4,067
Location
Fort Worth
You wouldn't be talking about the Winsystem would you? At one time I could see six different repeaters key up on that massive bloated system covering the same area. What a horrible waste of repeater pairs where there is otherwise no way for anyone to get a repeater pair in So Cal. A long time ago it was an interesting system and seemed to work ok but now it only serves itself.

“Open the pod doors, HAL”

.
 

K6GBW

Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
994
Reaction score
1,730
Location
Montebello, CA
You wouldn't be talking about the Winsystem would you? At one time I could see six different repeaters key up on that massive bloated system covering the same area. What a horrible waste of repeater pairs where there is otherwise no way for anyone to get a repeater pair in So Cal. A long time ago it was an interesting system and seemed to work ok but now it only serves itself.
No, it was a DMR system. I avoid the Winsystem like I avoid Tattoine and Corisant.
 

wa8pyr

Retired and playing radio whenever I want.
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,650
Reaction score
4,206
Location
Ohio
Today I drove across Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. Just for laughs I had a CB running scan. Except for skip stations in Georgia and Texas I heard nothing, nada, zip, zilch.

On the way back I called out on multiple ham repeaters and also got no response. Calling out on 146.520 also got no response. I'm starting to feel like this whole radio thing is a lost cause! I mean seriously, if you can't find one single swinging Johnson on radio in a county of 10 million people I just don't know where you can!
Black Friday? Good luck. Everybody was too busy shopping. Gotta buy that crap from China as fast as they can....
 

K6GBW

Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
994
Reaction score
1,730
Location
Montebello, CA
FM should be quiet compared to AM and SSB. Not sure what you could be hearing. Honestly the CB service would have just been better to make it SSB only and call it good. You get the most power out and best range with it. Having competing modes on only 40 channels is gonna create a mess. Oh wait...CB's already a mess so I guess it doesn't really matter.
 
Top