scanlist
Scanning since the 70's to today.
All APD TG's are full pro-voice digital including dispatchers.
Primary Aurora Fire TG's remain analog.
Phil.
Primary Aurora Fire TG's remain analog.
Phil.
There are no scanners on the market that receive ProVoice. Without getting a 2-way programmed into the system, you're out of luck.gfrench said:Erik,
What type of receiver does it take to listen to ProVoice? Brand/Cost?
scanlist said:Denver approved a $25 million plus simulcast system (Like Aurora's) upgrade earlier this year so it will be a year or more at the earliest to get an idea whether they plan on having the District cars digital or not. Right now some specialized users have it but use has been limited so far. ESK could shut down the party in either case.
Phil.
Field equipment is the easy part. I can't see them bumping up the single site configuration to pro-voice before taking it down for the simulcast system.datainmotion said:Actually the EEB is installing the mobiles District by District as we speak. Per one of their techs, it will be about a year before the system infrastucture is installed and running.
Better yet don't tap mod the 895. Use the 895 as the controlled receiver with regular Etrunker or the ESK Etrunker program which does control the 895 scanner. It worked flawlessly for me before the BC245XLT came out.Thayne said:I think I will dedicate an old 895 I have sitting around to tapping the discriminator and spend the winter exploring options to listen to EDACS systems using ESK and ProVoice.
It was the city's intention back in 1992 to control who could monitor them. Will this be a repeat performance? In time we will find out.Thayne said:I hate to think about not being able to listen to Denver anymore.