nsrailfan6130
Member
Honestly, I wouldn't blame police for encrypting. This is a perfect example of why.
Here is a newsworthy story:....
Although RR was not specifically mentioned, my Ohio County,WV feed was detrimental in capturing a B&E suspect this afternoon... The cops were extremely cold in their search when a listener called 911 to report the suspect's whereabouts and soon thereafter actually apprehended him.
Civilian hears about manhunt on iPhone app; tackles and... | www.wtov9.com
If anyone cares to listen to the archives of this call to Gashell Run Rd , it begins right about noon and goes on for an hour or two.... At first the radio was on scan but soon after the first deputy's arrival, when the foot pursuit began, I locked both radios to the sheriff's TG. Also, the initial deputy was injured and transported to the hospital meanwhile another officer stopped and detained a possible "getaway" vehicle.... FWIW there has been a rash of daytime burglaries in that part of the county recently and hopefully with this incident, the police have the perpetrator....
Another good reason normal frequency channels should be left open non encrypted. Oh, but then that means paper work for the few lazy cops out there when they catch a suspect.
Does paperwork disappear when their radio traffic is encrypted?
Honestly, I wouldn't blame police for encrypting. This is a perfect example of why.
Good job to the person that helped. I have on several occasions helped law enforcement by reporting (helping) on things they were looking for and never once did they get mad. One was an escaped prisoner. All do to the fact I was able to hear my local police and help them out “legally”.
Ask any Police Officer who has had public help and see what they say about encryption. This nonsense is at the upper levels of departments. They guy at a desk whose job is to “maintain” communications. The joker who is sold a load of equipment that usually does not work has no idea what he is doing and does not really care. Yes, most departments need to be able to encrypt for special occasions but full time is just wrong!
Good job to the person that helped. I have on several occasions helped law enforcement by reporting (helping) on things they were looking for and never once did they get mad. One was an escaped prisoner. All do to the fact I was able to hear my local police and help them out “legally”.
Ask any Police Officer who has had public help and see what they say about encryption. This nonsense is at the upper levels of departments. They guy at a desk whose job is to “maintain” communications. The joker who is sold a load of equipment that usually does not work has no idea what he is doing and does not really care. Yes, most departments need to be able to encrypt for special occasions but full time is just wrong!
Glad that worked out. That's exactly what I use the scanner for these days - wherever the action is, that's where I don't want to be, lest I get sucked up into the works. I'm happy listening from a distance and making sure my family and I are safe from whatever it is I'm listening to.This is one time I steered clear of the action!
Good job to the scannist who got the job done- this time! Unfortunately nsrailfan is correct. I can just see it now. Scannist gets seriously injured while trying to do the cops job and then sues the department claiming negligence. There is a reason the dispatcher tells you to back off and let the cops do the job.
Glad that worked out. That's exactly what I use the scanner for these days - wherever the action is, that's where I don't want to be, lest I get sucked up into the works. I'm happy listening from a distance and making sure my family and I are safe from whatever it is I'm listening to.
I can recall a few occasions when I have assisted my local PD by using a scanner.. One time there was a suicide call that was being routed through 4 different agencies. The gentleman was in his garage speaking with his son on a cordless phone, The son called his local 911 comm center to report the incident, I heard this call on my scanner and heard the units moving in on the subject, who had a loaded 12guage shot gun pointed straight at his head.... They were having issues relaying the information from the son to our local units, So I called up the dispatcher, asked him if any of his units on scene had a scanner with them... He asks me to wate a minute or so, And I hear him call on the tac channel to the commanding officer to ask if anyone had a scanner, the unit radioed back to dispatch advising them that yes a unit did infact have a scanner. So I advised the dispatcher of what frequencies to search to pick up the subjects phone... They ended up finding his call, and were able to Listen the subject and his son. The dispatcher thanked me for providing the information to him, and the PD units were able to make quick decisions on scene to eventually dissarm the subject and get him the assistance he needed. As I have read on here, there are a lot of oppinions that differ when it comes to the assistance of a LEO via a civilian with a scanner. The bottom line is that some of us out here can provide much needed help, It just depends on the department. I agree that it's wrong for these crooks to be out there with these instant reception applications that are available via smart phones. Maybe the apps should be less easy to get, possibly require a per month fee to use, and be restricted for use by "pre-pay" type phones. Encrypting general dispatching is just pointless. Tactical channels, Sure.. Those should be encrypted for officer safety, No questions asked.