BC246 and 800MHz

Status
Not open for further replies.

scanfan03

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2003
Messages
1,714
Reaction score
11
Location
Houston, Texas
Can anyone compare the sensitivity on the 246 and the Pro-95 for the 800MHz band? I have a 95 right now, but want to know if the 246 will be more sensitive on that band.
 

baddandy23

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
For me personally i think that it is more sensative and it gives me alot clearer reception on the 800mhz that my pro 96. i havnt compared it to my 95 yes as my main radio is my 96... however, aside from the digital aspect, the 246 is quickly becoming my radio of choice :D
 

brwkem

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
baddandy how does it do on the police/fire frequencies not in 800?

thx.
 

baddandy23

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
For the VHF-Hi, i think that it does very well, once again i belevie that it may be better than my 96. However in UHF on a 460.375 freq, my 96 does better, but overall, it is really bringing in the signals. Especially for my local PD on 159.xxxx.
 

pgogas

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2003
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
For what it is worth... on my Pro-95 with the RS 800MHz duck I cannot hear the local airport ATIS. With the same antenna on the 246T, I can hear ATIS with almost no static.

800MHz on the 246T seems better than my Pro-95 using the same antenna. BTW, I didn't know how much the stock Pro-95 antenna sucked until I purchased the 800MHz duck. It was well worth the $15.

Peter, AG5C
 

kikito

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
84
Location
North Pole, Alaska
scanfan03 said:
Someone on here complained that the reception on VHF sucked.

In my area, the Pro-96 is 'slighty' better across all bands, but it depends on location, even within the same room sometimes, the reception changes....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top