I'd have to read up again, but my understanding is that scanners monitoring P25 systems are "immune" to rebanding effects. That is, the way the system expresses the active frequency in a channel grant is no different in systems that are using rebanded frequencies as opposed to those that are not using rebanded frequencies. Not being able to monitor the system myself, I'm not really able to comment further. And I hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong in that assertion.
Perhaps consider running a control channel decoding software package - Pro96Com is the one I'm familiar with but it probably doesn't work with the 396 - to see if the system is more active than your scanner is revealing.
Also, can you comment on talkgroups in use or agencies using this system in Anderson beyond what is listed in the database? I'm curious if other Anderson County agencies have switched over aside from Anderson PD.
Note that I changed the site number for the Beaufort County site - it's now reporting 1-063. Thanks for the confirmation on the Anderson site.
Perhaps consider running a control channel decoding software package - Pro96Com is the one I'm familiar with but it probably doesn't work with the 396 - to see if the system is more active than your scanner is revealing.
Also, can you comment on talkgroups in use or agencies using this system in Anderson beyond what is listed in the database? I'm curious if other Anderson County agencies have switched over aside from Anderson PD.
Note that I changed the site number for the Beaufort County site - it's now reporting 1-063. Thanks for the confirmation on the Anderson site.