Best performing MilAir scanners/receivers

Status
Not open for further replies.

KD4UXQ

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
223
So I am thoroughly impressed with the performance of the Uniden BCT15X performance on Mil Air. Especially image rejection even when connected to an external antenna designed for 225-400 and 118-150.8 MHz. I have a home brew multi-band dipole that is really surprising me right now.

I have other scanners that cover Mil Air and they are decent enough performers, but I am looking for a hand held with good image rejection in VHF and UHF Air bands including the VHF Mil Air ranges that also has good quick search capabilities like the BCT15X. I have a BCD396XT, but it has some issues with images, especially connected to an external antenna that frustrate searching.

My other scanners are a Sony Wavehawk which is too slow for searching, but does listen well for programmed channels. I also have a Pro-164 which does pretty good too, but does have some image rejection issues affecting searching and a few birdies in the way.

I am starting to look at other reasonably priced receivers such as the Icom IC-R6 and the Alinco DJ-X11.

What I would like to know from Mil Air fans here is, what is your experience with these receivers and is there anything else I should be considering that does not cost a lot more than the Alinco DJ-X11. I am trying to find one that performs very well for all VHF and UHF aviation monitoring and care less about anything else it receives. I am most concerned about image rejection and birdies in these bands as well as audio quality and to a lesser extent battery life. I just would not want one that eats batteries so if one lasts 8 hours and the other 15, no big deal for me.

Is there a much higher priced AOR or something that is really worth the extra expense?

I am mainly interested in VHF and UHF aviation receiver performance with fast search capabilities, and in a hand held. Other bands are negligible to me. I would welcome a receiver designed around the best performance from 118-151 and 225-400 and didn't even cover anything else. But of course that does not exist.
 

KD4UXQ

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
223
So I am thoroughly impressed with the performance of the Uniden BCT15X performance on Mil Air. Especially image rejection even when connected to an external antenna designed for 225-400 and 118-150.8 MHz. I have a home brew multi-band dipole that is really surprising me right now.

I have other scanners that cover Mil Air and they are decent enough performers, but I am looking for a hand held with good image rejection in VHF and UHF Air bands including the VHF Mil Air ranges that also has good quick search capabilities like the BCT15X. I have a BCD396XT, but it has some issues with images, especially connected to an external antenna that frustrate searching.

My other scanners are a Sony Wavehawk which is too slow for searching, but does listen well for programmed channels. I also have a Pro-164 which does pretty good too, but does have some image rejection issues affecting searching and a few birdies in the way.

I am starting to look at other reasonably priced receivers such as the Icom IC-R6 and the Alinco DJ-X11.

What I would like to know from Mil Air fans here is, what is your experience with these receivers and is there anything else I should be considering that does not cost a lot more than the Alinco DJ-X11. I am trying to find one that performs very well for all VHF and UHF aviation monitoring and care less about anything else it receives. I am most concerned about image rejection and birdies in these bands as well as audio quality and to a lesser extent battery life. I just would not want one that eats batteries so if one lasts 8 hours and the other 15, no big deal for me.

Is there a much higher priced AOR or something that is really worth the extra expense?

I am mainly interested in VHF and UHF aviation receiver performance with fast search capabilities, and in a hand held. Other bands are negligible to me. I would welcome a receiver designed around the best performance from 118-151 and 225-400 and didn't even cover anything else. But of course that does not exist.
And what about the Alinco DJ-X30?
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
10,573
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Over the years I've had good success with the RS Pro 2004, 2005, 2006 and Pro 43 hand held for VHF and UHF air. I also have a Yupiteru MVT-7100 that is very sensitive and an AOR AR8200 that works very well. A lot of other scanners I've had were not as sensitive or had mushy audio on AM.
prcguy

So I am thoroughly impressed with the performance of the Uniden BCT15X performance on Mil Air. Especially image rejection even when connected to an external antenna designed for 225-400 and 118-150.8 MHz. I have a home brew multi-band dipole that is really surprising me right now.

I have other scanners that cover Mil Air and they are decent enough performers, but I am looking for a hand held with good image rejection in VHF and UHF Air bands including the VHF Mil Air ranges that also has good quick search capabilities like the BCT15X. I have a BCD396XT, but it has some issues with images, especially connected to an external antenna that frustrate searching.

My other scanners are a Sony Wavehawk which is too slow for searching, but does listen well for programmed channels. I also have a Pro-164 which does pretty good too, but does have some image rejection issues affecting searching and a few birdies in the way.

I am starting to look at other reasonably priced receivers such as the Icom IC-R6 and the Alinco DJ-X11.

What I would like to know from Mil Air fans here is, what is your experience with these receivers and is there anything else I should be considering that does not cost a lot more than the Alinco DJ-X11. I am trying to find one that performs very well for all VHF and UHF aviation monitoring and care less about anything else it receives. I am most concerned about image rejection and birdies in these bands as well as audio quality and to a lesser extent battery life. I just would not want one that eats batteries so if one lasts 8 hours and the other 15, no big deal for me.

Is there a much higher priced AOR or something that is really worth the extra expense?

I am mainly interested in VHF and UHF aviation receiver performance with fast search capabilities, and in a hand held. Other bands are negligible to me. I would welcome a receiver designed around the best performance from 118-151 and 225-400 and didn't even cover anything else. But of course that does not exist.
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
23,490
Location
Bowie, Md.
If you can find one, a RS PRO-43 handheld is hard to beat. It's getting a bit long in the tooth, though. It's famous for being one hot milair handheld

I understand that the old Uniden BC250 is also very good here - you don't need the optional card for this...Mike
 

737mech

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
2,038
Location
Clark County, NV.
I have the BC125AT for that same stuff, milair/ vhf air. It does a great job, wish they didn't chop the band, they stopped at 380. I have a few local freqs here in the 380-400 range. Not a deal breaker though, nice little airband/milair scanner.
 

SOSull66

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
64
Location
Monmouth County NJ
Love my old Pro-43.
I just refurbished it.....
I opened her up....recoated the backs of the buttons with defroster line liquid to refresh the contacts, replaced the volume knob, replaced the speaker, and resoldered a loose antenna connection.

It works great again.
 

KD4UXQ

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
223
I have been looking for a decent PRO-43 without paying a fortune. What is it about it that made it so great on MilAir?
 

pinballwiz86

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
1,489
Location
Missouri
Another vote for the BCT15X. I don't know why they made the BCT15X's little brother the 346XT(C) not able to do mil air...
 

Xray

Member
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
565
I have an Alinco DJX2000 as my primary milair scanner, does a great job but I imagine it would be tough to find.
Also have a Pro 43, great no frills milair scanner, doesn't look very slick on the hip though.
Have a BCD396XT, not overly impressed with its performance, has some clipping and weak reception issues [may or may not be my fault].
finally I have a BC125AT, as noted it is hobbled having milair clipped at 380, I'd be hard pressed to recommend.
 

KD4UXQ

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
223
I'd look into the Pro-164 is has the coverage & capacity. Can be had from 50-100 USD & you can load freqs with software
I'm going to try using a PRO-164 for Mil Air. The Yupiteru radios have always piqued my interest too but I have not read anything in detail about their performance on civil or Mil Air, especially in regards to image rejection.

Has anyone had any experience using the Icom IC-R6? I had an Icom IC-R2 years ago and it was prone to image reception. The IC-R20 is more than I would like to invest, but if it is worthy I would consider it.
 

joeuser

The Wretched
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
1,614
Location
North Central Kansas
I'm going to try using a PRO-164 for Mil Air. The Yupiteru radios have always piqued my interest too but I have not read anything in detail about their performance on civil or Mil Air, especially in regards to image rejection.

Has anyone had any experience using the Icom IC-R6? I had an Icom IC-R2 years ago and it was prone to image reception. The IC-R20 is more than I would like to invest, but if it is worthy I would consider it.
I can't speak to the quality & performance, they always seemed to expensive for me. I love this hobby, but I just will not devote that kind of money to it. Uniden, GRE, Radio Shack, etc. always seemed to fill my needs. The 164 can be had on eBay from 50 - 100$ so its a cheap way to go. You'll want to get a better antenna but the stock is decent... Quite a few software options for it also
 

eorange

Secret Agent Man
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
2,556
Location
Cleveland, OH
From personal experience...the BC780 was one of the best mil air scanners made. The Icom R6 and AOR 8200mk3 both do great. If you like Uniden handhelds, then get a BR330T. That was my primary mil air handheld for 4 years and it performed well.

Don't know if I'd get the AOR just because of mil air, due to the price. It has many other features, and so solid mil air is a bonus.

The R6 is inexpensive, tiny, runs forever on 2 AAs, and scans very fast which is crucial for mil air. It does great on all airbands, and is in fact my only scanner that can stop on a local 111.1 MHz airport beacon during a band search. It's my primary mil air handheld.

Avoid GREs...my former PSR-500 sucked bad on mil air. Not sensitive, muddy comms when I did get them, and total image overload on 138-142 MHz mil air.
 

Swipesy

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
1,822
Location
Northern Ohio
Avoid GREs...my former PSR-500 sucked bad on mil air. Not sensitive, muddy comms when I did get them, and total image overload on 138-142 MHz mil air.
Same comment applies to the GRE PSR-800 as the 500 - Avoid.

Also the Uniden BC125AT works well on Mil Air and can be purchased for $103.00 on Amazon.
 

KD4UXQ

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
223
Bought another Pro-164 that appears to be like new off eBay. I had not been using mine much, but am trying it out again. I am finding out it does fine portable in most locations, but an external antenna can overload it. That's where the BCT15X shines. No overload at all on an external antenna which is dedicated for Mil Air.

I will be at Daytona Beach in October during the Air Show and there is tons of Mil Air down there besides. Also staying in a condo on the 26th floor, so reception will be great with my portable antenna sitting on the balcony.

I was eyeing the ICOM IC-R6 and because it gets favorable reports for Mil Air, I will likely try one of those soon as well. Also very nice to know which others to consider when looking around eBay and which ones to avoid.

This BCT15X is one of the best scanners I have bought in a long time. Mil Air and civil air performance is extremely good and the price on Amazon is great!

I think the replies here could help others when deciding what scanners to consider for Mil Air.

Thanks to all!
 
Last edited:

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
10,573
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
The AOR AR-8200MK3 is great for VHF and UHF air and excels as a portable VHF/UHF receiver, but its not a very good police scanner and its much worse as an HF receiver.
prcguy

From personal experience...the BC780 was one of the best mil air scanners made. The Icom R6 and AOR 8200mk3 both do great. If you like Uniden handhelds, then get a BR330T. That was my primary mil air handheld for 4 years and it performed well.

Don't know if I'd get the AOR just because of mil air, due to the price. It has many other features, and so solid mil air is a bonus.

The R6 is inexpensive, tiny, runs forever on 2 AAs, and scans very fast which is crucial for mil air. It does great on all airbands, and is in fact my only scanner that can stop on a local 111.1 MHz airport beacon during a band search. It's my primary mil air handheld.

Avoid GREs...my former PSR-500 sucked bad on mil air. Not sensitive, muddy comms when I did get them, and total image overload on 138-142 MHz mil air.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top