Best setup of channels for Denver??

Status
Not open for further replies.

brianmacho

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Location
Lakewood, CO
I currently have my PRO-95 setup with each PD district on it's own channel bank...(ex. Dist. 1 on Bank 1 etc) so that I can select which district I want to monitor, with all special channels...(Swat, Homicide, etc) on Bank 0.

I am thinking that the extra time it takes to scan all 7 banks for Denver is causing a loss in the transmissions that I catch. Does anyone have a better setup or idea for my channel setup??

I have attached my current setup in a Win95 file. (Rename the file extension from .txt to .p95) If anyone has anything better, please send it my way, also if I am missing any talkgroups, help me out!

Thanks,

Brian
Lakewood
 

brianmacho

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Location
Lakewood, CO
Pro-95 Setup

How does everyone else have their Pro-95's set up for Denver area EDACS systems? I am looking for the best way, and am trying all sorts of configurations
 

eyes00only

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2004
Messages
2,816
Reaction score
109
Location
Denver Colorado
Probably no correct answer. I have 3 banks set for Denver PS, and one for PW. I'll skip the PW. Bank one is; sub one = dist. 1&6 because I live in 1 & work in 6. sub 2 = dist. 2&3 / sub 3 = dist. 4&5 / sub 4 = T-O (traffic) etc. & sub 5 = special events, citywide, FERN, etc. I should note that I have ALL CALL in EVERY subbank. Bank two is fire & ems & special events repeated. Bank 3 is for RARE or NEVER monitored talkgroups. I don't use software, so I can't put up a "file". The 95 is not as QUICK as my 94, as far as getting to a talkgroup. It is better than the 94 in most aspects, but I hate the fact that you can't just go to ALL CALL & WAIT for action. This probably makes no sense, but remember two things; my first sentence, and that it's Sat. PM, and I have had a few alcoholic beverages :lol: :oops: .

Jerry
 

brianmacho

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Location
Lakewood, CO
LOL.....

Actually it actually make a lot of sense....at least to me...maybe it's the few I've had myself. LOL

Thanks....
Brian
 

Halfpint

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
949
Reaction score
0
Location
Slightly NE of the People's Republic of Firestone
Well... *Personally* I've got each district in their own bank so that I can easily switch from district to district as I happen to be passing through at the time. I've also got 3 of the 4 remaining banks set up for FD and EMS so that I can sort of similarly switch as possibly needed. The remaining bank is for the `Public Works' system. As I've got both several PRO-92s and PRO-96s and Don's Win92 and Win96 software I can usually have at least *1* of them setup so that I can have it available for travel.

*If* I *didn't* have the software and necessary cable(s) I would still probably have at least 1, most likely a PRO-92, scanner programmed as outlined above since, at least for *me*, it's a lot easier than trying to lock and unlock channels `on the fly' *when*, actually *if*, I may find myself having to go into `The People's Republic of Denver'.

Just an `Olde Fart's' 2¢ worth. {GRIN!}
 

scanlist

Scanning since the 70's to today.
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
168
Location
Greeley, CO
Unfortunately GRE radios are limited to 5 banks of 30 groups so the one bank per police district doesn't work.

Past and current method I use for GRE radios:

Bank 0: Distirict and Dispatch TG's, Citywide T.O. 1-3
Bank 1: District Car to Car TG's
Bank 2: District TAC TG's
Bank 3: Fire, Amb, EOC and Events TG's
Bank 4: Scratchpad

Phil.
 

eyes00only

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2004
Messages
2,816
Reaction score
109
Location
Denver Colorado
scanlist said:
Unfortunately GRE radios are limited to 5 banks of 30 groups so the one bank per police district doesn't work.

Phil.

The 95 has 5 sub-banks of 20 each ( 0 to 19 ) :wink: .

Jerry
 

scanlist

Scanning since the 70's to today.
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
168
Location
Greeley, CO
The 95 has 5 sub-banks of 20 each ( 0 to 19 )

I've been using the PRO-96 so long that I forgot the 93/95's are limited to 100 TG's per bank. :roll:

Phil.
 

MikeyB

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2004
Messages
688
Reaction score
0
Location
Centennial, Colorado
I'm confused following this post. I think what Halfpint is saying is that in he uses one of the banks of channels per district, not one of the banks of talkgroups within each bank of channels. That way, you just have to press one button to switch districts, rather than getting into the talkgroup menu. I personally on my Pro95 have three banks of channels set up for Denver - one for PD, one for Fire and one for EMS. I also have the PW systems in a bank, but I never listen to it.
 

Todd-NG

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2004
Messages
161
Reaction score
0
Location
Northglenn, CO
brianmacho said:
I currently have my PRO-95 setup with each PD district on it's own channel bank...(ex. Dist. 1 on Bank 1 etc) so that I can select which district I want to monitor, with all special channels...(Swat, Homicide, etc) on Bank 0.

I am thinking that the extra time it takes to scan all 7 banks for Denver is causing a loss in the transmissions that I catch. Does anyone have a better setup or idea for my channel setup??

I have attached my current setup in a Win95 file. (Rename the file extension from .txt to .p95) If anyone has anything better, please send it my way, also if I am missing any talkgroups, help me out!

Thanks,

Brian
Lakewood

I think that Brian's main concern here is that when his scanner is searching all 7 banks that he has set up for Denver PD, he is missing some of the transmissions due to the time it takes to go through all the banks. Just after he made his original post I emailed him a possible solution to catch more of the calls, however he must not have received my message because he never acknowledged it. Anyway, here was what I had suggested to him in the email. Since he has each district set up on an individual bank (banks 1 thru 6) and bank 0 set up for all of the special units, he should keep them that way. He can then take bank 7 and fill the sub-banks with all the talkgroups from each of the districts and special units, making sure that each of the ID tags shows the district number. He can then scan just one bank (bank 7) to hear everything within the city and if he comes across something of interest, say in district 2, all he has to do is press button 2 to open that bank and then 7 to close the bank with all the other talkgroups. Making 2 keystrokes would be a lot easier than making the multi keystrokes it takes to turn sub-banks on and off.
 

Halfpint

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
949
Reaction score
0
Location
Slightly NE of the People's Republic of Firestone
MikeyB said:
I'm confused following this post. I think what Halfpint is saying is that in he uses one of the banks of channels per district, not one of the banks of talkgroups within each bank of channels. That way, you just have to press one button to switch districts, rather than getting into the talkgroup menu. I personally on my Pro95 have three banks of channels set up for Denver - one for PD, one for Fire and one for EMS. I also have the PW systems in a bank, but I never listen to it.

Yep!

Why bother with `playing' with the TG *Sub Banks* when it's *a lot* easier to just change *Banks*? {GRIN!} It *is* a PRO-92 not a PRO-93 or PRO-95 everything of *any* `importance?' fits easily into a 100 entry *Sub Bank*.

As for the PW system... On `snow days' it can come in *quite* handy and the last time SWMBO and the children went to the Zoo it also `paid off'. (They caught the `chatter' about one of the `exhibits' they had gone down there to see *finally* being opened almost a full half hour before the crowds caught on that it was open and got a `personalized tour' because they and only a couple other people were the only ones there at the time. [SWMBO told me that when they left people were qued up 4 to 5 deep waiting to `get in' and she `thanked her lucky stars' she'd `caved' and had taken the scanner with her.])

Now D.I.A. is another story... I basically don't/won't go there. About the *only* way I'll probably *ever* go there is *if*, for whatever strange reason, either my body or ashes *have* be `shipped' that way. (It's not only that I feel that *both* D.I.A. and the so-called `security checks' that the TSA *subjects* travelers to are absurd but that air travel in general has become a farce. I've seen cattle headed off to slaughter treated better. [The last time I traveled by air was when my father died back in '85 and I had to both get down to Sun City to handle matters and then had to drive his car, and a U-Haul trailer, filled filled with assorted stuff that I didn't want banging around in the back of some `drayage' truck. (Stuff like a dozen oil paintings my father had done, a `coffee table' that he'd built and had been the subject of an article in both `Good Houskeeping' and `Better Homes and Gardens' back when both mags actually were something, and a lot of other assorted `personal belongings' that one tends to want to take with you and keep *and* doesn't want strangers pawing and going through. {WAN GRIN!}) Strangely enough I *still* have that car! (Though... The first person who shows up with $1K, a new side terminal battery, a new set of sparkplug wires {V8}, and a `jerrycan' of gas can become the proud owner of an '80 Olds Cutlass Supreme Brougham w/ a slightly `warmed' 306 CID V8 [I installed a `Mile-a-More' camshaft when the original one developed a few flat lobes. The cam gives it a bit more `punch' up around `highway cruising' speeds which also meant that as long as one `kept their foot out of it' it was able to get over 20mpg overall not just highway. (I think I actually still have the records to prove it, too! {VB GRIN!}) Which isn't too bad for an '80 that size, especially an Olds / `Tuna barge'!] and auto tranny. {GRIN!} It'd make for one less vehicle we'd have to end up moving. {CHORTLE!})])

Oh, well... Just an `Olde Fart's' 2¢ worth. {GRIN!}
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top