With a high enough antenna, you may get Chicago too!On 460.125, just heard unencrypted traffic NAC 186, Branford PD. Hearing encrypted traffic on NAC 510, Manchester PD.
I knew that, recently reprogrammed them in and was hearing them in the clear for a long time before and after reprogramming.Database not showing them encrypted, but who knows..
I can't get Manchester on just my whip in Ansonia. Thank you for the Branford report. Answers my question.On 460.125, just heard unencrypted traffic NAC 186, Branford PD. Hearing encrypted traffic on NAC 510, Manchester PD.
Hello, hearing Branford 5x5 as I type thisJust trying to determine if Branford PD went encrypted or I'm just not picking up properly. Don't have the scanner hooked up to the big antenna, using my whip. Thanks!
Yeah and? What does that have to do with Branford?ICYMI
Manchester PD is Full encrypt all freqs
![]()
On 460.125, just heard unencrypted traffic NAC 186, Branford PD. Hearing encrypted traffic on NAC 510, Manchester PD.
Please Read what n1ofj saidWith a high enough antenna, you may get Chicago too!
Yeah and? What does that have to do with Branford?
Read a bit closer
Please Read what n1ofj said
It’s comments such as yours that makes me very reluctant to bother to post much of ANYTHING here cuz you get jumped on for nothing
Pretty sad you are
I guess you've forgotten about the time @W1KNE defended you in a thread about, ironically, Manchester encryption...Nuff said
Not sure what you think that I said wrong...Read a bit closer
Please Read what n1ofj said
It’s comments such as yours that makes me very reluctant to bother to post much of ANYTHING here cuz you get jumped on for nothing
Pretty sad you are
since your original comment was a reply to me, I thought your comment was funny. I got a kick out of it.Not sure what you think that I said wrong...
Yeah just because 460.125 is Chicago police citywide lol.since your original comment was a reply to me, I thought your comment was funny. I got a kick out of it.
That ones on me, was responding off my phone, no disrespect intendedYeah just because 460.125 is Chicago police citywide lol.
OR... maybe this was a thread about Branford PD , not Manchester. No one disparaged your comment, we simply commented that it had nothing to do with Branford. Trying to keep the thread from being badly "derailed" the way it is now. You've actually brought up Manchester PD in it's own post a while back, where some of the "elders" came after you, and I personally defended you from those clown-comments. So to take this somehow personally is the wrong direction, as it was not meant in that direction. We are very well aware Manchester PD is encrypted, we all saw your thread on it. I, like others, am just trying to keep this thread on Branford PD, the original intent. Period. So that's that, move on.That ones on me, was responding off my phone, no disrespect intended
That being said
Simply put
If 1 puts forth a thought on here & it does not go with the flow/Elmers here, You are trashed , Can anyone HONESTLY say I'm wrong??
What i said was that MPD is full encrypt, I'm in their back yard, TRYING to impart local knowledge, but its not appreciated obviously
This site has gotten way too inbred with the cliques, Can anyone deny that ??
Its stuff like this that keeps away people that are trying to learn/contribute here
NUFF said
As stated earlier...Branford police comeing up with enc nac 186 someone out that way am in New Britain now
With that said, they were never in the DB has being partially encrypted. Information like this should be submitted to the DB. I made the change for now to reflect it.Branford is not encrypted but does have encryption capability which they do use. Branford tends to be secretive with a lot of information. That said, they're system can be flakey at times and produce garbled transmissions that are digitized.