It seems I can upload Calgary ems frequencies but hear nothing on playback. no problem uploading Calgary police service and fire. does it have anything to do with Calgary digital radio system now being called Calgary municipal radio system.
calgary ems now silent
- Thread starter jloriginal
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2002
- Messages
- 8,339
http://forums.radioreference.com/prairies-pacific-coast/345133-calgary-ems-now-silent
They are deprecated on Calgary Municipal, see the red highlights.
Now on the system below but...
They are deprecated on Calgary Municipal, see the red highlights.
Code:
Alberta Health Services - Calgary Metro EMS Talkgroups
[COLOR="Red"]EMS have switched over to using their new encrypted talkgroups on AFRRCS (Alberta First Responder's Radio Communication System).
[/COLOR]
DEC HEX Mode Alpha Tag Description Tag
16400 401 A A1 Dispatch A1 - EMS Dispatch [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16496 407 A A2 Updates A2 - EMS Dispatch Updates [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16560 40b A A3 Chat A3 - EMS Chat [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16592 40d A A4 Chat A4 - EMS Chat [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16624 40f A A5 SCHC A5 - South Calgary Health Centre [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16656 411 A A6 FMC A6 - Foothills Medical Centre [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16720 415 A A7 PLC A7 - Peter Lougheed Centre [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16752 417 A A8 RGH A8 - Rockyview General Hospital [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16784 419 A A9 ACH A9 - Alberta Children's Hospital Deprecated
17136 42f A B1 Updates B1 - EMS Updates w/CFD Deprecated
16432 403 A BKUP DISP C1 - EMS Backup Dispatch [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16528 409 A BKUP UPDATE C2 - EMS Backup Updates [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16688 413 A BKUP PATCH C3 - Backup Hospital Patch [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16880 41f A BKUP MCI C4 - EMS Backup MCI Events [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16464 405 A BKUP DISP C5 - EMS Backup Dispatch [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16912 421 A A11 MCI A11 - EMS MCI [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16848 41d A A11 Spare A11 - EMS Spare [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16944 423 A A12 TAC 1 A12 - EMS TAC 1 [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
16976 425 A A13 TAC 2 A13 - EMS TAC 2 [COLOR="red"]Deprecated[/COLOR]
17008 427 A A14 TAC 3 A14 - EMS TAC 3 [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
17104 42d A A15 TAC 4 A15 - EMS TAC 4 [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]
17232 435 A CHEARS Calgary Hospital Emergency Aid Radio System [COLOR="red"]Deprecated [/COLOR]Now on the system below but...
Code:
Calgary Zone - AHS Talkgroups
DEC HEX Mode Alpha Tag Description Tag
1011 3f3 [COLOR="Red"]E[/COLOR] CGY - D1 Calgary Metro Disp 1 EMS Dispatch
1012 3f4 [COLOR="red"]E[/COLOR] CGY - D2 Calgary Metro Disp 2 EMS Dispatch
1013 3f5 [COLOR="red"]E[/COLOR] CGY - D3 Calgary Rural Disp 3 EMS Dispatch
1014 3f6 [COLOR="red"]E[/COLOR] CGY - D4 Calgary Rural Disp 4 EMS Dispatch
1015 3f7 [COLOR="red"]E[/COLOR] CGY - D5 Calgary IFT Disp 5 EMS Dispatch
1016 3f8 [COLOR="red"]E[/COLOR] CGY - 1016 AHS 1016 EMS-Talk
1017 3f9 [COLOR="red"]E[/COLOR] CGY - 1017 AHS 1017 EMS-Talk
1019 3fb [COLOR="red"]E[/COLOR] CGY - T9 Calgary Tac 9 EMS-Tac
1020 3fc [COLOR="red"]E[/COLOR] CGY - T10 Calgary Tac 10
Last edited:
ems gone silent
I'm not sure what that means. Ive checked afrrcs and don't see any ems frequencies. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong
I'm not sure what that means. Ive checked afrrcs and don't see any ems frequencies. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong
Thank you very much for your help. I wonder if the same thing will eventually happen to CPS & fire
Thanks again for your help
Surely we will be able to break this ems encryption at some point. I know win500 doesnt work for this now
kayn1n32008
ØÆSØ
You need a AFRRCS radio with EMS talk groups and the encryption key in order to hear them.
Ok, here's the thing about encryption, to put this to bed once and for all:
Encryption is designed specifically for the purpose of preventing you from hearing something you're not supposed to be hearing.
As such, there are laws in place to make it punishable to "break" encryption.
This can't really be compared to getting a new digital mode enabled in a scanner, because the digital modes aren't intended to keep you from hearing things. (That may be a "side benefit" for some closed-minded agencies, but it's certainly not the primary purpose of a digital mode.)
Saying that you wish someone would break encryption is like saying you wish that somebody would give you a key to unlock a warehouse full of stuff. You might get access to the warehouse very briefly, but you'll get in trouble for it, and all the owners are going to do is change the locks. The same thing would happen with an encrypted transmission if the encryption key ever got released or "broken": The system managers would change to a completely new key in a matter of seconds.
Like it or not, for wise or dumb reasons/excuses, some agencies have enabled encryption on their channels, and it's doubtful it will go away, ever.
Can we please make this the last time we discuss encryption in this thread? RR has rules that encryption is to be discussed only in one thread on the forum: this one.
Encryption is designed specifically for the purpose of preventing you from hearing something you're not supposed to be hearing.
As such, there are laws in place to make it punishable to "break" encryption.
This can't really be compared to getting a new digital mode enabled in a scanner, because the digital modes aren't intended to keep you from hearing things. (That may be a "side benefit" for some closed-minded agencies, but it's certainly not the primary purpose of a digital mode.)
Saying that you wish someone would break encryption is like saying you wish that somebody would give you a key to unlock a warehouse full of stuff. You might get access to the warehouse very briefly, but you'll get in trouble for it, and all the owners are going to do is change the locks. The same thing would happen with an encrypted transmission if the encryption key ever got released or "broken": The system managers would change to a completely new key in a matter of seconds.
Like it or not, for wise or dumb reasons/excuses, some agencies have enabled encryption on their channels, and it's doubtful it will go away, ever.
Can we please make this the last time we discuss encryption in this thread? RR has rules that encryption is to be discussed only in one thread on the forum: this one.
kayn1n32008
ØÆSØ
To expand on this, if a key is compromised, AFRRCS users have the capability to rekey(Over The Air Rekey, aka OTAR) the radios over the network. As in, the key manager can remotely rekey any/all radio when ever they wish.
My appologies. I'm not very knowledgeable at this stuff. thank you for your help
Not a problem. I didn't mean to come off like an ***, and sorry if I did. It's just that encryption is a dead horse that has been beaten so hard on this website that it is just a pile of glue now. 
Personally, I don't agree with the amount of encryption that is being employed in agencies all over this continent. I dispute the argument that general operational channels must be encrypted for personnel safety (despite the conversation I just partook in in the encryption containment thread mentioned above). I am the communications officer for a local public safety agency which prides itself in its relations with the community at large, and you can't maintain that kind of relationship if you are hiding yourself from the community. Not only do we not encrypt our comms, but we stream them on Broadcastify, in an official capacity. We're happy to have people know what we're doing. During a particularly intense incident several years ago, we had friends, family, and general public in Newfoundland, Ontario, and several US states contacting us in near real-time to compliment our incident commander on her and her crews' performance.
Things that we don't want everyone on the planet to be learning about is simply not broadcast on a radio frequency. If we had a reason to regularly transmit private/privileged data and could not do it without using a radio, I would see a benefit for having some encryption - maybe one channel. But definitely not all of it.
I can't speak to AHSEMS's decisions or rational because my (other) job involves doing dispatch for them, and for me to offer comments could be seen as a violation of certain employment policies. But as a public safety person in general, I can admit the benefit to having encryption in some but not all situations in this modern day.
Personally, I don't agree with the amount of encryption that is being employed in agencies all over this continent. I dispute the argument that general operational channels must be encrypted for personnel safety (despite the conversation I just partook in in the encryption containment thread mentioned above). I am the communications officer for a local public safety agency which prides itself in its relations with the community at large, and you can't maintain that kind of relationship if you are hiding yourself from the community. Not only do we not encrypt our comms, but we stream them on Broadcastify, in an official capacity. We're happy to have people know what we're doing. During a particularly intense incident several years ago, we had friends, family, and general public in Newfoundland, Ontario, and several US states contacting us in near real-time to compliment our incident commander on her and her crews' performance.
Things that we don't want everyone on the planet to be learning about is simply not broadcast on a radio frequency. If we had a reason to regularly transmit private/privileged data and could not do it without using a radio, I would see a benefit for having some encryption - maybe one channel. But definitely not all of it.
I can't speak to AHSEMS's decisions or rational because my (other) job involves doing dispatch for them, and for me to offer comments could be seen as a violation of certain employment policies. But as a public safety person in general, I can admit the benefit to having encryption in some but not all situations in this modern day.
Thank you Jay. I just dont know the terminology. I only know that i connect my scanner to win500 and I get to hear stuff. I wont post anything else on here. I think the more i use rr ill understand the rules and where to talk.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2002
- Messages
- 8,339
Don't do that, the forums exist so we can exchange ideas and opinions. I only moved the posts to keep the AFRRCS in focus, no need to feel that anything wrong was done.
It was a legitimate question to ask where some of your favourite monitoring has gone to. I would want to know the same as well.
See you on the forums!
Microscan
Member
jloriginal,
See:
How safe is safe? AES 256 encryption and your data. - Canadian Cloud Backup | Datacentres in Canada
It gives a good plain language overview of what someone would be up against if they tried to break the encryption key. Advanced Encryption Standard 256 bit (AES 256) is the system used by EMS and others such as commercial vehicle enforcement on AFRRCS. Just a matter of time until the RCMP is on board as well.
Don't shy away from participating in the forums, in my experience they're a friendly bunch and a wealth of information.
For what its worth, I agree completely with Jay's views on the amount of encryption.
See:
How safe is safe? AES 256 encryption and your data. - Canadian Cloud Backup | Datacentres in Canada
It gives a good plain language overview of what someone would be up against if they tried to break the encryption key. Advanced Encryption Standard 256 bit (AES 256) is the system used by EMS and others such as commercial vehicle enforcement on AFRRCS. Just a matter of time until the RCMP is on board as well.
Don't shy away from participating in the forums, in my experience they're a friendly bunch and a wealth of information.
For what its worth, I agree completely with Jay's views on the amount of encryption.
Calgary police radio
Have calgary pollice gone to a different system? Havent heard anything for 24 hours
Have calgary pollice gone to a different system? Havent heard anything for 24 hours
smason
Member
Seems they've moved to encryption, see this thread:
https://forums.radioreference.com/prairies-pacific-coast/368269-calgary-encryption-2.html
- Status
Similar threads
SDS100/SDS200:
Unknown Department with Unknown TGID
