Not that I don't sympathize here, but the situation in Camden has been pretty bleek for a long time. My research indicates that the police department has had intervention by the NJSP since 2005. Anyone in law enforcement can tell you, if your department is operating during intervention, it doesn't mean you won the grand prize at the carnival.
Camden has been listed as the most dangerous city four straight years now, with a population just under 80,000. I recognize that being part of the Philly Metro area doesn't help, but when your homicide rate per citizen is higher than Baltimore, DC and New Orleans, cities that are all near or have been near a million people, you're doing something wrong.
Do I believe this was the right move by the government in Camden? No, but I also have to say that the current Camden council has inherited quite a mess from previous administrations, which likely included poor housekeeping by the former chief.
Best of intentions and all, no matter who you are, if you inherit a mess, you never know what's all in it until you're done cleaning it up.
And frankly speaking, the problems in Camden are very much all the way around, not just with public safety or their politicians. You have a school system that is currently held in intervention by the State, and 40% of the citizens are living below the poverty line.
I don't know what the starting pay, or even veteran offiver pay is there, but with that level poverty, did the officers actually believe that their salaries could be maintained for long?
Poverty affects business, which affects money, which effects services. I can't say it any plainer.
I sure wish the firefighters and officers the best, I really really do, but goodness sake, the writing was on this wall for a long time.