Cell phones may be allowed on airplanes!

Status
Not open for further replies.
N

N_Jay

Guest
Steve2003 said:
Check out the story here.
------------------------------------------
Allowing high-speed Internet access and cell phone use on planes could offer cash-strapped airline companies a new source for revenues, said Doug Wills, spokesman for the Air Transport Association, the major airlines' trade group.
-------------------------------------------

OK, so if the seat back phones are too expensive to use, what makes people think that the in seat wireless internet will be any cheaper.

And, since any "in-air" cell phone use will need to work through a micro-cell on the plane, and would also have to carry some airline charges and profits.

I ain't holding my breath!!! :wink:
 

mdulrich

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 9, 2002
Messages
1,628
Reaction score
16
Location
Van Wert, Ohio
FCC Chairman Michael Powell was on Fox News and what was announced was just the FCC rules possibly being relaxed. The FCC feels that ground interference issues have been solved with advances in technology. It would still be up to the FAA to decide on the onboard aircraft issues.

Mike
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
mdulrich said:
FCC Chairman Michael Powell was on Fox News and what was announced was just the FCC rules possibly being relaxed. The FCC feels that ground interference issues have been solved with advances in technology. It would still be up to the FAA to decide on the onboard aircraft issues.

Mike

LOL. My favorite techie!!

So just what "technology" (I mean "lobbiest payment") is he talking about?
 

poltergeisty

Truth is a force of nature
Banned
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
4,012
Reaction score
133
Location
RLG, Fly heading 053, intercept 315 DVV
N_Jay said:
mdulrich said:
FCC Chairman Michael Powell was on Fox News and what was announced was just the FCC rules possibly being relaxed. The FCC feels that ground interference issues have been solved with advances in technology. It would still be up to the FAA to decide on the onboard aircraft issues.

Mike

LOL. My favorite techie!!

So just what "technology" (I mean "lobbiest payment") is he talking about?
Same question? Gee I love the fcc. :lol:
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
poltergeisty said:
N_Jay said:
mdulrich said:
FCC Chairman Michael Powell was on Fox News and what was announced was just the FCC rules possibly being relaxed. The FCC feels that ground interference issues have been solved with advances in technology. It would still be up to the FAA to decide on the onboard aircraft issues.

Mike

LOL. My favorite techie!!

So just what "technology" (I mean "lobbiest payment") is he talking about?
Same question? Gee I love the fcc. :lol:

I like the FCC, it's Powell, I have questions about!!
 

ghmangus

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Location
Brighton
I like the foxnews piece that mentions louisville based AIRCELL

"Once plans are completed and planes outfitted with the equipment, wireless high-speed Internet access might be found on commercial domestic flights by 2006, said Jack Blumenstein, chairman and CEO of Louisville, Colo.-based AirCell"

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,141545,00.html
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
ghmangus said:
I like the foxnews piece that mentions louisville based AIRCELL

"Once plans are completed and planes outfitted with the equipment, wireless high-speed Internet access might be found on commercial domestic flights by 2006, said Jack Blumenstein, chairman and CEO of Louisville, Colo.-based AirCell"

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,141545,00.html

I like this quote from the Chicago Trib:

"James Pilcher, vice president for marketing for Oak Brook-based Verizon Airfone, said the new Web-access system probably would match the fees Boeing charges for its system. Boeing charges $29.95 for unlimited use on flights of longer than six hours, $14.95 for domestic flights and $9.95 for 30 minutes of service."

Wooo hooo, at prices like that it will be a sure winner!! :roll: :wink: :evil:
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
poltergeisty said:
I hate the fcc. :x Some how I don't think powell is the only contributer to this decesion making. :evil:

Of course you hate the FCC, have yopu given any thought to a better solution? :twisted: :twisted:
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
poltergeisty said:
A solution? I am not sure I understand.

Hating a reglatory agency without giving any thought to a better way to regulate the industry is kind of pointless!
 

poltergeisty

Truth is a force of nature
Banned
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
4,012
Reaction score
133
Location
RLG, Fly heading 053, intercept 315 DVV
See I don't like the way they have done things. For one, the whole nexthell bs. I'm sure you are familiar with. Also the fact that the F.C.C has allowed this so called low power frequency use and because of it there will be interference problems (sound familiar) with the military Because it is going to use it's frequency with higher power which happens to be the same as our garage doors. What the hell for don't they have enough RF spectrum. Another act for concern for me is that the F.C.C is not going to regulate the slim and filth of satillite radio. It wont surprise me if theres a Jerry springer channel. Another cause of my dislike is this trunking digital mubo jumbo. This is a reglatory agency? Ha

There is simply to much crap associated with the F.C.C. Including the other federal departments. There is a lot of lobbying going on theres a lot of corruption. I think this is the same for the F.B.I or the C.I.A, I.R.S, I.N.S you name it.

One day when the glass of lies finally over flows there will be the true nature of there actions. As what happened at the U.N. had we not went to Iraq there would not have been an oil for food scandal and everything would have been business as usual.

I'm not a stupid person I know a lot of things. To me every thing is a puzzle only a mater of time before you put all or most of the pieces together. Read signature.

Ok now you know my F.C.C dislike. Sounds a little anti goverment but it's the TRUTH :shock:
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
I would say I am speachless (but those who know me, would only laugh!)

So you want MORE government regulation?

I don't know many in the industry who think "That" is the answer.

I would certainly like to see teh FCC take a deaper technical and longer term view on some of the decisions thay make.

On the other hand, I would lik eto see them extend their control carfully, as excessive government control and "planning" of a society has been fairly conclusevely shown to be the WRONG way to go.

Now as we drift from Radio to social/ecconomic models of society, we should probably close this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top