BCD436HP/BCD536HP: Charging on the BCD436HP

Status
Not open for further replies.

KE0GXN

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
1,353
Location
Echo Mike Two-Seven
I totally agree... I personally... don't care what somebody else does... It's there radio and there battery's...
Ya know...

But people ask why not... They just don't want to hear it...

Yep...their stuff, so in the end their dime.


I actually find it interesting to charge batteries in a charger like the C9000.....maybe I have no life. :(
 
Last edited:

RandyKuff

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
2,307
Location
Lorain, Ohio
I actually find it interesting to charge batteries in a charger like the C9000.....maybe I have no life. :([/QUOTE said:
That's why mine is in a different room... Ya have a tendency to watch it do it's thing.
Don't know if it has a name... I'll just call it "C9000 syndrome".
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
That's all fine and dandy Randy (hehe), but ignoring voltage readings completely, HOW LONG SHOULD I SET THE CHARGE TIME for on my 436HP using the USB jack on the side of the scanner.....again, while not looking at the voltage displayed? :)

Paul

You shouldn't ... but your call. I would not threaten to melt a $500+ scanner when you can fix the problem of in scanner charging with a $70 charger.

Sure there are much cheaper chargers .. and such, but a charger like the C9000 will do your batteries in about 2.5 hours and you will know they are properly charged.

Just look at the top of this thread for the thread with the pics of the melted scanner. That says enough as to why .. it is a bad idea to charge in your scanner.
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,060
It's human nature to think that nothing bad will ever happen to one's self.

... then it does...
 

MStep

Member
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
2,183
Location
New York City
Rule of thumb for all those who will find the 436 "under the tree" this Christmas:
Internal charger= BAD /// External charger= GOOD
 

ol-redneck

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 23, 2016
Messages
28
Location
Mount Ida, AR 71957
Most of the folks here on the forums charge their batteries with external chargers, rather than charging them in the radio. Yes, it is a bit of a hassle to have to swap out batteries every day or so, but there seems to be a discomfort level about charging the batteries in the radio (obviously even with the radio having to be off) because there is a fear that the 436 does not incorporate safeguards in the event on an overcharge.

Panasonic makes some very good chargers that can charge an odd number of batteries (you don't have to charge in pairs), so that I can charge 3 batteries at a time. According the Panasonic, there are 9 safeguards to prevent what in effect would be a "meltdown"--- those safeguards are not incorporated in the 436. I would only charge batteries in the 436 as a very last resort.

That seems like a plan! Fujitsu Smart Cut-Off Advance Individual AA/AAA Ni-MH Battery 4-hour Quick Charger Kit with 4-Pack AA 1900mAh Rechargeable Batteries-Newegg.com
 

enosjones

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,905
Location
Price, Utah
You shouldn't ... but your call. I would not threaten to melt a $500+ scanner when you can fix the problem of in scanner charging with a $70 charger.

Sure there are much cheaper chargers .. and such, but a charger like the C9000 will do your batteries in about 2.5 hours and you will know they are properly charged.

Just look at the top of this thread for the thread with the pics of the melted scanner. That says enough as to why .. it is a bad idea to charge in your scanner.



I've never had a problem.


Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top