Update your software & check the programming forums
Your assertion that the "fleetmap" is incorrect for the system seems confusing. The only Motorola system that I can find in Columbus, IN is the Columbus Public Safety TRS. It is a Motorola Type II system, which has a predefined fleetmap and therefore the database does not have a fleetmap attached at all; therefore, it cannot have an error.
Hmm, maybe it formerly was a Type I or a Hybrid, but in any case once it is marked as a Type II, why would programming software acknowledge any defunct fleetmap? Just to be clear, once it is marked as a Type II, there is no access to a fleetmap in the DB Admin interface. As far as anyone (DB Admins included) there is no fleetmap attached to this system.The database does, in fact, have a fleet map defined for sid 304. It doesn't appear on the "web view" of the system (i.e. the link above), but it most definitely appears in the XML data returned via the SOAP interface.
Hmm, maybe it formerly was a Type I or a Hybrid, but in any case once it is marked as a Type II, why would programming software acknowledge any defunct fleetmap?
Don: Perhaps this is something that needs to be addressed on the WebService group.
Fair enough assumption from your point of view.I don't think programming software can reliably make the decision on its own. That is, how is programming software able to choose between "the 'flavor' is wrong, and the fleetmap is good" vs. "the 'flavor' is correct, and we should ignore the fleetmap"?
I would guess that the assumption has to be made that if it is Type II, there is no fleetmap. An alternative would be to clear the fleetmap when it is changed to Type II in the DB, but does that mean you still get a blank one from the getTrsDetails call? What about other Type II systems? Just free thinking here, BTW.I agree. I'll suggest to Lindsay that the getTrsDetails call not return a fleetmap unless it's necessary (though I don't know how his code would make any such "valid" decision, either).
I am leaving this topic in this forum although it really has nothing to do with the database per se. The software error you are experiencing is explained by the link supplied by AlabamaRS above.
Your assertion that the "fleetmap" is incorrect for the system seems confusing. The only Motorola system that I can find in Columbus, IN is the Columbus Public Safety TRS. It is a Motorola Type II system, which has a predefined fleetmap and therefore the database does not have a fleetmap attached at all; therefore, it cannot have an error.
Perhaps if you explained in more detail what you are seeing that leads you think there is an error, we could further explain what you are seeing.
As discussed by Don and I in the previous posts, this is probably a remnant of a previous Type I or Type IIi (hybrid) system. Don has revised his software to ignore this, I have placed a "trouble" ticket in our bug tracking system to address this from the DB side. Thanks for finding this.