Hello,
I’m looking to replace my Diamond X50A antenna with something better for VHF/UHF public safety (monitoring only). I’ve been leaning toward the Diamond X300A, but like the X50 I already have, the X300 is tuned for the 2m/440 Ham bands. Then today I learned of the Comet GP-6NC, which seems to be a nearly identical design to the X300, but is tuned to the Public Safety bands. Both the GP6 and X300 are a co-linear design, each about 10 ft tall, each with phasing of 2- 5/8λ, and 5- 5/8λ.
Trouble is, Comet lists the gain for their GP6-NC as 6.5/9.0 in dBi:
VHF/UHF Dual-Band | Comet Antenna
Whereas Diamond lists the gain for their X300A also as 6.5/9.0, but in dB:
https://www.diamondantenna.net/x300a.html
If you compare other Comet models vs. similar Diamond antennas you’ll see the same issue with respect to dB vs. dBi gain figures. For instance, the Diamond X50A gain is listed as 4.5/7.2 in dB:
https://www.diamondantenna.net/x50a.html
Whereas the Comet GP-3 gain is also 4.5/7.2, but it’s listed in dBi:
Dual-Band | Comet Antenna
Again, these are seemingly identical antennas.
The real world difference of dB vs. dBi is 2.15 dB, which is not insignificant. Meaning if these specs are true, the Diamond models all have a 2.15 dB advantage over their Comet counterparts. But is that actually the case? I’m guessing these antennas, the GP6 vs X300, or the GP3 vs. X50, are nearly identical in real world performance, but one company is simply using a more accurate gain metric than the other. Which is surprising to me as I was under the impression that both were good antenna makers.
Am I missing something here? Is the Comet GP6 virtually identical to the Diamond X300 in spite of the 2.15 dB difference in listed specs? Or is the X300 actually better?
Thanks for your help!!
.
I’m looking to replace my Diamond X50A antenna with something better for VHF/UHF public safety (monitoring only). I’ve been leaning toward the Diamond X300A, but like the X50 I already have, the X300 is tuned for the 2m/440 Ham bands. Then today I learned of the Comet GP-6NC, which seems to be a nearly identical design to the X300, but is tuned to the Public Safety bands. Both the GP6 and X300 are a co-linear design, each about 10 ft tall, each with phasing of 2- 5/8λ, and 5- 5/8λ.
Trouble is, Comet lists the gain for their GP6-NC as 6.5/9.0 in dBi:
VHF/UHF Dual-Band | Comet Antenna
Whereas Diamond lists the gain for their X300A also as 6.5/9.0, but in dB:
https://www.diamondantenna.net/x300a.html
If you compare other Comet models vs. similar Diamond antennas you’ll see the same issue with respect to dB vs. dBi gain figures. For instance, the Diamond X50A gain is listed as 4.5/7.2 in dB:
https://www.diamondantenna.net/x50a.html
Whereas the Comet GP-3 gain is also 4.5/7.2, but it’s listed in dBi:
Dual-Band | Comet Antenna
Again, these are seemingly identical antennas.
The real world difference of dB vs. dBi is 2.15 dB, which is not insignificant. Meaning if these specs are true, the Diamond models all have a 2.15 dB advantage over their Comet counterparts. But is that actually the case? I’m guessing these antennas, the GP6 vs X300, or the GP3 vs. X50, are nearly identical in real world performance, but one company is simply using a more accurate gain metric than the other. Which is surprising to me as I was under the impression that both were good antenna makers.
Am I missing something here? Is the Comet GP6 virtually identical to the Diamond X300 in spite of the 2.15 dB difference in listed specs? Or is the X300 actually better?
Thanks for your help!!
.
Last edited: