Its on hold for now due to some shifting priorities. However, it is still on our radar. We just want to make sure that we release a solid product for providers that wish to use it. Anything less is unacceptable.
Its on hold for now due to some shifting priorities. However, it is still on our radar. We just want to make sure that we release a solid product for providers that wish to use it. Anything less is unacceptable.
I hope this comes to light soon,
love listing to stuff i missed with the dead audio trimmed.
Lindsey has a great idea ... if it ever comes this will really take off
With the hard drive space RR pays for, this should already be implemented for us to choose and not be something we should have to pay for in my feelings.
I know I heard multiple complaints about the high fee of $15 or whatever it was. I'm not sure the reason behind $15 but it sounds like you might get quite a few more buyers if the fee was lower.
Jason
Lindsay,
The only option I am interested is limiting the streams to the RR community, and not being used by 3rd party apps - as I already self support the other options you are marking as premium.
IMHO, it just doesn't seem fair to charge per stream when there are those like me that send multiple scanner feeds to RR and get the same benefits as those who only stream one feed..[/QUOl;k.k..;;;,.,,,,,,,,,,,;;klollTE]
this would be great if you offered a method for feed providers to pass the expense along to the listeners.
It may even encourage more precise feeds on