Complied List of Jurisdictions Planning New Radio Systems

Status
Not open for further replies.

firebal

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
241
Location
Baltimore, MD
Public Safety radios throughout the state should be programmed with the FiRST MD-Call & Statewide Tac Channels if they have radios that are capable of operating on FiRST. This will allow interoperability throughout the state. During large scale events or incidents, operations can be utilized on these talkgroups and if need be patched into other talkgroups or systems.

Is this something that is in fact a policy? Or is it something that should be? If its not a reality, what a shame.
 
Last edited:

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
Is this something that is in fact a policy? Or is it something that should be? If its not a reality, what a shame of the state.

There's probably lots of "recommended best practices" that have been out there over the years. However, keep in mind that FiRST is fairly new and some localities still operate on VHF. You can't mandate something like this an expect immediate implementation - at least not unless you pay for radio upgrades and replacements with those mandates. The FiRST system itself has been in the works for more than 10 years (if I recall correctly) - nothing happens overnight and without other forcing functions (i.e. "you won't get funds unless...", etc.), the attitude in some far corners of any state are typically "we don't need those 'big city' things". On the other hand, you'll also find large metropolitan jurisdictions not wanting to be told "you must" either - so it goes both ways.

For the most part, there are still the long-standing nationwide TAC channels on all bands that can be both utilized and even patched by MEMA to provide interoperability. Even Baltimore City used the 8TACs during their recent 800 Mhz system failure (and not FiRST).
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,063
Location
The OP

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
Cecil County dropping the ball?

Cecil's new 800 Mhz licenses are in "termination pending status for failure to meet the buildout requirement".

WQYF685
WQXX275

Paperwork snafu? Change of plans?
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,063
Location
The OP
Kinda sounds like someone dropped the ball, the county or their consultant...

Or maybe the frequencies couldn't be coordinated? What entity coordinates freqs in their area?

Or maybe they are now considering going the state's 700 system?

They seem adverse to spending tons of money on their radio infrastructure, unlike other Maryland jurisdictions.
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
Cecil's new 800 Mhz licenses are in "termination pending status for failure to meet the buildout requirement".

WQYF685
WQXX275

Paperwork snafu? Change of plans?

Noticing now that Cecil petitioned the FCC to keep their licenses... letter was dated August 16th but not entered into the FCC system until 10/24?

Petition seems to suggest that the frequencies are "active" since 6/15/2017...
https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/...ttachmentKey=20242172&attachmentInd=licAttach

Even so, the licenses are still in a termination pending status.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,063
Location
The OP
Noticing now that Cecil petitioned the FCC to keep their licenses... letter was dated August 16th but not entered into the FCC system until 10/24?

Petition seems to suggest that the frequencies are "active" since 6/15/2017...
https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/...ttachmentKey=20242172&attachmentInd=licAttach

Even so, the licenses are still in a termination pending status.

They could file the petition online if they chose to do so. Not sure why there is a wide discrepancy in the date of the letter, and when it showed up in the system. But the county has been have administrative issues by their own admission, and also states the frequencies were active back in June, although it seems they did not file the proper paperwork at that time either.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,063
Location
The OP
Last edited:

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
Wicomico notified bidders a week or two ago that they selected Motorola turnkey.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

If I am reading it correctly, Wicomico advised the FCC that as of 12/1 their new sites are built (at least some).

ULS License - PubSafty/SpecEmer/PubSaftyNtlPlan,806-817/851-862MHz,Trunked License - WPMU653 - WICOMICO, COUNTY OF

but they also have two licenses in terminaton pending status....

ULS License - PubSafty/SpecEmer/PubSaftyNtlPlan,806-817/851-862MHz,Trunked License - WQYM454 - WICOMICO, COUNTY OF - Frequencies Summary

ULS License - PubSafty/SpecEmer/PubSaftyNtlPlan,806-817/851-862MHz,Trunked License - WQYM691 - WICOMICO, COUNTY OF - Frequencies Summary
 

ThePhotoGuy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 2011
Messages
2,139
Location
Maryland

Mr_Boh

Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Messages
542
Location
The Land of Pleasant Living
It's not just the shore. I am involved in similar projects in urban/suburban areas and they almost consistently miss their mark. Honestly it's not a bad thing because the way these projects go, if you give people (both customers and vendors) a far out date they will slack off longer thinking they have more time whereas people do their best to hit a date so they will prioritize better and make informed decisions about pushing back deployments.

I've heard rumors that several counties in Maryland have had to push back new systems including Montgomery, Anne Arundel, and Howard for different reasons.
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
It's not just the shore. I am involved in similar projects in urban/suburban areas and they almost consistently miss their mark. Honestly it's not a bad thing because the way these projects go, if you give people (both customers and vendors) a far out date they will slack off longer thinking they have more time whereas people do their best to hit a date so they will prioritize better and make informed decisions about pushing back deployments.
The larger the more likely delays. Shore systems probably slip mostly because these are big changes for small counties. In Worcester County's case, it sounds like - as is the case many places - they tried to keep costs down and then found out they needed more towers... this seems to be a common theme these days... we're seeing new systems require double (or more) the number of towers.

It's always better to delay and get it right - unlike some other western shore counties did by only building half a system and going live.

There could be other reasons for delays too. I know of a new P25 system near me that was essential "forced" to go live because - as the story goes - the old Motorola system suddenly "failed"...

It was interesting to see the numerous failures of the Upper Shore (UES) system just before they switched over to FiRST... gotta wonder.
I've heard rumors that several counties in Maryland have had to push back new systems including Montgomery, Anne Arundel, and Howard for different reasons.

Ha! These three haven't much gotten off the ground at all. Lots of paperwork, etc. and in some cases, funding for planning and other things seems to constantly get shifted to other priorities.
 

DisasterGuy

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
1,255
Location
Maryland Shore
The larger the more likely delays. Shore systems probably slip mostly because these are big changes for small counties. In Worcester County's case, it sounds like - as is the case many places - they tried to keep costs down and then found out they needed more towers... this seems to be a common theme these days... we're seeing new systems require double (or more) the number of towers.

It's always better to delay and get it right - unlike some other western shore counties did by only building half a system and going live.
"

For clarification, Worcester submitted an RFP based on specific coverage criteria (6db, 14db and 20db in-building w/ portable on hip). The county awarded a contract for those coverages. Any additional sites beyond the contract sites will be the responsibility of the vendor based on their contractual coverage requirements. The county from the beginning of the RFP process expected not less than 6 sites be required.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
Anne Arundel status....

https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/...tachmentKey=20280551&attachmentInd=applAttach

In late 2016, the County finalized and published the Request for Proposals
(RFP) for the Next Generation APCO-25 Public Safety Trunked Radio
system. Proposals were due to the County by May 31, 2017.

• Evaluation of proposals commenced in early June 2017.

• Contract negotiations commenced in early September 2017.

The County completed contract negotiations and awarded a $48.4M
contract to Motorola Solutions, Inc. on December 22, 2017
, for a new 22
site
Next Generation APCO-25 Phase 2 Public Safety Trunked Radio
system
and the complete replacement of all legacy mobile and portable
subscriber radio terminals with new APCO-25 Phase 2 compliant mobile
and portable subscriber radio terminal equipment.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top