considering purchasing an AOR handheld have a Q?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 15, 2008
Messages
14
I formerly had an AOR 8200 handheld unit with freq max range 500khz-2040mhz if I recall. I am now looking into purchasing the upodated model mkIII but before making this purchase will AOR soon be releasing another updated model? I just don't want to make an expensive purchase and then something better gets introduced withing a 6 month time frame.
 

mule1075

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jan 20, 2003
Messages
3,992
Location
Washington Pennsylvania
i was looking at the same an 8600 or an 8200 mkii or so on.well i had a deal for an 8600 but did not have the cash and a injury at work took me out of that deal.but that is not an answer to the question you asked.to tell you the truth i still want an aor in my collection but i have been looking real hard at an icom r-20 as a matter of fact in my post in the wanted section on this website was for an aor 8600 or a icom r-20 but again that is not what you asked.i think for a handheld the icom would be a better deal because you do not have to buy any add ons aor you need to buy a card for ctcss and recording audio where if you get the icom it has ctcss/dcs decode 4 hour record option i think.that is just my take on it.sorry if i ran on and on to be honest i had a few beers and sorry for the bad spelling and puncutation.Adam
 

scannersnstuff

Active Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
1,947
also consider too.if you want the handheld wideband communications receivers to use as a scanner,you may be deeply disappointed.most of them scan slow,have no dpl,some have terrible audio.had the alinco dj-x2000.it was the most over priced usuless piece of junk going.after not learning that lessen,i bought the alinco dj-x30.that piece of crap is about as usefull as a child's play walkie talkie.at least the later was only $199.00.the dj-x2000 was like $550.00.i probably will never buy a "communications receiver" again.jusy my .2 cent's,other's mileage may vary.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2008
Messages
14
I appreciate your feedback but I already had an AOR 8200 I had no issues what's so ever with reception or audio quality. Frequency search scan was not slow at all.

now as for CTCSS decode audio recording to me I don't need that if I wanted to record audio I would use a line in lead to pc HDD. Options are expensive because I had pc lead $110 and voice inverter card $80.

I always enjoyed the quality that AOR presents. But getting back to the original post I was just wondering if at anytime soon they where considering releasing an updated model that had higher frequency coverage etc.. The reason I sold my original AOR8200 was because they had released the MKIII with TCXO compensated chip and increased frequency range but I ended up using the money for something else and now I am considering getting the MKIII but dont want to end up back in the boat where an updated model gets released within a 6 month span or so. If that was the case I rather hold on to my money till an updated model gets released.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top