Does anyone know the network ID of the Cranford PD? I know it's APCO25, someone told me I need to know which channel or ID they use to program my radio.
I know in the RR database, it says they have a 654 DPL (if that helps). I have heard they are even hard to monitor with a digital scanner. They may even be totally encrypted by now. However, I do know that their old PD frequency, 155.250 is still being used by their traffic department and some crossing guards. It's often active just before and after school hours; also during major town events. At least you can still easily monitor their FD on 476.900.
Don't quote me on it, but I think I read somewhere in the NJ forum that apco 25 systems do not use pl or dpl. I just ran tone search on pt pleasant, toms river and berkeley and it does not indicate any on either. I you have one set for cranford select csq and try it. I hope it works for you, otherwise they may be encrypted, or maybe I'm off base and nothing I said will help, good luck!
APCO P-25 does not use a pl or dpl. Instead they use a NAC (network access code). You do not need this code in order to listen, in fact current scanners do not even have a way to use the code.
When I first got my bearcat 796D I couldn't hear Cranford with the apco 25 card till i removed the dpl code which i obtained on one of the scanning websites. Once the dpl tone was removed they were loud and clear.
A friend of mine just got his 396T yesterday. He is trying to set it up to monitor the Cranford NJ PD which is APCO25. Now....The scanner from what I can tell will only use APCO25 in trunking mode and not conventional. So the dilemma is how to fake the scanner to monitor a APCO25 conventional?
Anyone hear of any new firmware updates that might help? Cranford has 2 channels but I do not believe them to be trunked in any way...
A friend of mine just got his 396T yesterday. He is trying to set it up to monitor the Cranford NJ PD which is APCO25. Now....The scanner from what I can tell will only use APCO25 in trunking mode and not conventional. So the dilemma is how to fake the scanner to monitor a APCO25 conventional?
If they're not totally encrypted already, I'm sure they're heading in that direction. That town can easily afford the technology to make them impossible to monitor.
He was able to get the decode to work once he stepped outside the building or got closer to the source. Seems that the 396 has a little problem with picking up the APCO signal where a Moto XTS3000 sitting next to it can hear it just fine. Now...yes, I know that a commercial radio does have the needed selectivity and sensitivity for the freq its made for. I was a little dismayed that the 396 was a bit less sensitive though.
Also, would it not make some sense to have NFM, FM and P25 as options so as to not confuse anyone? I was trying to help him program the unit and I was not aware that AUTO was the only way to hear P25 conventional. I was thinking I had to go to the system section and use the P25 there until I realized that was only for trunking.