BOBRR
Member
Hi,
Do receiving only.
I have a new SDS200.
It is being fed from an old Scantenna in the attic. I think the model was ST-2, if I remember correctly.
The output is also, occasionally, fed to a SDRPlay RSP-2, and then to a SDR program like SDRUno on my pc.
Hence, I want to use a passive, and hopefully not too expensive, COAX antenna switch.
The Alpha Delta and Diamond's are somewhat more than I'd like to spend, but possibly.
Have seen in Amazon and elsewhere two Daiwa switches which I would appreciate your
opinions on.
First, anyone using these, or Daiwa in general ? Quality, etc. ?
One switch is a CS 201A
0-600 MHz
SO 239 connectors
Insertion Loss: <0.2 db (at ?)
The other is a CS 201 GII
0-2 GHz
N connectors
Insertion Loss: <1.2 db at 1.2 GHz
*For my scanner usage, think I would notice any difference between them in practice ?
Should I go with the 201 GII as it has a higher freq. range spec ?
The difference in cost is trivial.
But, it uses N connectors which would be, for me,would be a pain to implement. But doable.
Any thoughts would be most appreciated, as always, thanks,
Bob
Do receiving only.
I have a new SDS200.
It is being fed from an old Scantenna in the attic. I think the model was ST-2, if I remember correctly.
The output is also, occasionally, fed to a SDRPlay RSP-2, and then to a SDR program like SDRUno on my pc.
Hence, I want to use a passive, and hopefully not too expensive, COAX antenna switch.
The Alpha Delta and Diamond's are somewhat more than I'd like to spend, but possibly.
Have seen in Amazon and elsewhere two Daiwa switches which I would appreciate your
opinions on.
First, anyone using these, or Daiwa in general ? Quality, etc. ?
One switch is a CS 201A
0-600 MHz
SO 239 connectors
Insertion Loss: <0.2 db (at ?)
The other is a CS 201 GII
0-2 GHz
N connectors
Insertion Loss: <1.2 db at 1.2 GHz
*For my scanner usage, think I would notice any difference between them in practice ?
Should I go with the 201 GII as it has a higher freq. range spec ?
The difference in cost is trivial.
But, it uses N connectors which would be, for me,would be a pain to implement. But doable.
Any thoughts would be most appreciated, as always, thanks,
Bob