Discone or whip antenna for HF?

Joined
Jun 2, 2024
Messages
59
I want to know which is best for HF reception, a discone or a whip antenna?

For MF reception, only loop antenna is best or any other antenna can also be used?
 

merlin

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,058
Location
DN32su
Discone for HF is going to be huge, even 50 MHz can take up most of a small back yard.
Best bet for HF confined space is a mag loop or if you have the real estate, a dipole in a number of configurations.
My best was a three wire folded dipole. 90 foot long and 50 foot high.
Check out HF mini whips.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2024
Messages
59
Discone for HF is going to be huge, even 50 MHz can take up most of a small back yard.
Best bet for HF confined space is a mag loop or if you have the real estate, a dipole in a number of configurations.
My best was a three wire folded dipole. 90 foot long and 50 foot high.
Check out HF mini whips.
HF range is only upto 30 MHz. If such antennas take so much of space then why do radio receivers come with a 1ft long whip antenna?

I heard that a mag loop antenna is prone to EMI and not suitable for HF.

Can I use a passive loop antenna for HF?

Why this dipole antenna has discone elements?

 

dlwtrunked

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,354
1. HF range is only upto 30 MHz. If such antennas take so much of space then why do radio receivers come with a 1ft long whip antenna?

2. I heard that a mag loop antenna is prone to EMI and not suitable for HF.

3. Can I use a passive loop antenna for HF?

4. Why this dipole antenna has discone elements?

1. Its only sent a portable antenna on such radios. There is no actually *good* portable HF antenna. Those wanting a good HF antenna are going to pick one of their own choice.
2. Wrong. In fact, they are one of the most efficient solutions against EMI if a small antenna is being used. (You misunderstood something.)
3. Yes, but generally, unless it is a very big one, it will only work well on exceptional high gain receiver like the Airspy HF+ Discovery (where it works very well)
4. That is actually a discone antenna with added whips to give better performance on certain frequencies. It is a very poor HF antenna and is not designed for such. It does make a nice desktop VHF/UHF antenna but a high better discone will greatly outperform it.
 

N1EXA

FT8 Huntin Mudd Duck on the deep end of the pond !
Joined
Mar 3, 2022
Messages
254
Location
Acushnet Heights New Bedford MA - GRID FN41 mp
Discone for HF is going to be huge, even 50 MHz can take up most of a small back yard.
Best bet for HF confined space is a mag loop or if you have the real estate, a dipole in a number of configurations.
My best was a three wire folded dipole. 90 foot long and 50 foot high.
Check out HF mini whips.
IMG_9358-1024x768.jpg

Need a good Size Yard for an HF Discone - I agree Merlin !

Ive had the Best luck with Delta Loops - All you need is the wire a 4:1 Balun and some space !




Pete N1EXA
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,593
Location
Bowie, Md.
SDRs like the SDRPlay are really what passive loops like the YouLoop are for. If you are using a SDR, you already have a very sensitive radio, it doesn't take much antenna to make them work well.

We have MANY commercial loops, and even a few homebrew designs in our loops wiki here....and many work just fine in the MW area too


Mike
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2024
Messages
59
1. Its only sent a portable antenna on such radios. There is no actually *good* portable HF antenna. Those wanting a good HF antenna are going to pick one of their own choice.
2. Wrong. In fact, they are one of the most efficient solutions against EMI if a small antenna is being used. (You misunderstood something.)
3. Yes, but generally, unless it is a very big one, it will only work well on exceptional high gain receiver like the Airspy HF+ Discovery (where it works very well)
4. That is actually a discone antenna with added whips to give better performance on certain frequencies. It is a very poor HF antenna and is not designed for such. It does make a nice desktop VHF/UHF antenna but a high better discone will greatly outperform it.
Mag loop and discone are for VHF only but are not good for HF. I need a solution for HF reception.

So, what is the best solution for receiving shortwave broadcast without fading?

Can any radio receiver receive shortwave bands without fading?
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,593
Location
Bowie, Md.
Mag loops are great for HF- where you heard otherwise is simply untrue.

As for fading, that is a function of propagation - while an antenna can partially offset this, there is no simple cure. It's greatly impacted by solar activity - keeping an eye on sites like spaceweather.com will let you know when the sun is kicking up its heels

Mike
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2024
Messages
59
Mag loops are great for HF- where you heard otherwise is simply untrue.

As for fading, that is a function of propagation - while an antenna can partially offset this, there is no simple cure. It's greatly impacted by solar activity - keeping an eye on sites like spaceweather.com will let you know when the sun is kicking up its heels

Mike
I am not talking about occasional fading but the ones that happen everytime with most distant shortwave signals. Is it the radio receiver to be improved on this? Can a better AGC could mitigate this? Or is it the sensitivity of the receiver?
 

dlwtrunked

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,354
Mag loops are great for HF- where you heard otherwise is simply untrue.

As for fading, that is a function of propagation - while an antenna can partially offset this, there is no simple cure. It's greatly impacted by solar activity - keeping an eye on sites like spaceweather.com will let you know when the sun is kicking up its heels

Mike
Not in my comparison but it likely depends on what one defines as "great" and compares it with.
 

dlwtrunked

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,354
Mag loop and discone are for VHF only but are not good for HF. I need a solution for HF reception.

So, what is the best solution for receiving shortwave broadcast without fading?

Can any radio receiver receive shortwave bands without fading?
The best way to counter fading (and it will not be perfect) is to use a receiver capable of diversity receptions where it is equipped for two antennas and has such a mode. Also, experiment with the AGC setting, if you have one, and you may find a setting that you like better. Otherwise, you are left yelling at the ionosphere to say "stop it" but I do not think it will listen.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2024
Messages
59
The best way to counter fading (and it will not be perfect) is to use a receiver capable of diversity receptions where it is equipped for two antennas and has such a mode. Also, experiment with the AGC setting, if you have one, and you may find a setting that you like better. Otherwise, you are left yelling at the ionosphere to say "stop it" but I do not think it will listen.
Does the sensitivity of a radio receiver matters? A radio with higher sensitivity will have less fading?
 

paulears

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
881
Location
Lowestoft - UK
The amount of fading will be exactly the same, all that changes is the sensitivity of the individual receivers. A sensitive one might still hear in the noise.

You seem to be sucking up info like a Hoover, but getting really confused by things that are explained poorly - like the VHF and above discone you put a picture up of - it is NOT a dipole, it's a wide band antenna - it's mode of operation uses the disc and the cone to make the antenna resonant usefully at a range of frequencies. You could describe it as a dipole of sorts, but the mode of operation is different.
 
Last edited:
Top