• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Do repeaters use compression?

Status
Not open for further replies.

bobcrean

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2020
Messages
22
First time listening to DMR voice via a local repeater. The voices sound either compressed, or pitch shifted slightly lower...Sometimes it seems like the speaker is slurring words or drunk a bit. The high end of voices seems gone. Do typical DMR repeaters use compression for efficiency? If so are there typically settings that can be changed for this? Any other explanation for this?
 

vagrant

ker-muhj-uhn
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
3,412
Location
California
6.25 kHz of bandwidth does not convey the human voice as well as analog with more bandwidth. Additionally, some inexpensive DMR radios have poor transmit audio which makes it more difficult to understand. The best sounding DMR radio I have ever heard is a Kenwood 5300 series. It costs around $1000, or was it $3000, I forget.

1. Yes, digital modes, DMR being one of them, typically use less bandwidth for efficiency and or to also pass data with the audio.
2. The settings that can be changed would be to use a different digital mode that sounds better to you. I prefer P25 and Yaesu Fusion (C4FM).
3. All DMR repeaters are not the same, nor is the ancillary equipment installed with it. Additionally, the skillset of the installers is not the same.

Another way to fix it is for everyone to avoid using inexpensive DMR radios, or avoid talking to someone until they purchase a better radio. These two probably will not happen. Around here DMR was very popular a few years ago. Now it is very quiet. Of all the DMR repeaters near me, I only hear traffic about twice a week. (In other places it could be quite busy)
 
Last edited:

R8000

Very Low Battery
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,017
All digital repeaters that I am aware of just take your 1's and 0's and spit them back out as they are. I would guess the compression you are hearing is inside the transmitting radio's analog to digital conversion.
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
9,675
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
If you speak too close to a microphone or use compression you loose high end and add low end frequencies in the voice band. All good compressors have some sort of bass cut and/or high end increase to compensate for that problem.

Also if the data bits are lost during the air transmission it will create errors in the data and will also reduce the signal to a low defined audio signal without any high end and syllables will be lost.

DMR mostly uses 2 timeslots at a 12,5KHz bandwidth and Tetra uses 4 timeslots at a 25KHz bandwidth but the audio quality in Tetra are much better. But the equipment also costs 10 times more. Both hardware and software are probably then more advanced in Tetra equipment.

I've heard DMR transmissions that sounds real good but the exact same people could later sound awful, so DMR are probably more demanding of the correct microphone technique. Generally analog radio are much more forgiving of incorrect use of microphone gain and usage than digital radio as the dynamic range of the audio are very limited in most digital radio systems that requires a perfectly balanced audio level from a microphones compressor/limiter circuit.

/Ubbe
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,651
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
The quality of the radio's DSP and audio make the difference between good audio and utter garbage. This is true with DMR, P25, NXDN, TETRA and anything that uses a vocoder. Piss poor DSP/firmware, piss poor audio. Old, ancient subscribers with early versions can sound horrible where as current releases resolve issues. So does how the subscriber is programmed plays a factor in the delivered audio quality.
 

bobcrean

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2020
Messages
22
The radios in question are Motorola CP200d's. I thought they were good radios. It's a private repeater, with not much traffic. Would moving to 25khz from 12.5khz make things better?
 

KK6ZTE

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
913
Location
California
Or it could be working perfectly and this scanner user isn't familiar with the way digital voice sounds? It does sound quite different compared to analog.

Perhaps like the many customers who thought "going digital" was going to CD-quality audio from cassette tapes...?
 

lu81fitter

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
669
Location
Marshall County, Illinois
If you speak too close to a microphone or use compression you loose high end and add low end frequencies in the voice band.

I've heard DMR transmissions that sounds real good but the exact same people could later sound awful, so DMR are probably more demanding of the correct microphone technique.

/Ubbe

User etiquette is a real problem. I have heard one side of a conversation on a DMR system that is perfect. When the response comes back, it is barely intelligible. It sounds like they have the mic in their mouth. I notice this on the same system with different users. Most notably, the dispatch, where you know they are using the same radio. Some sound really good, others terrible.
 

bobcrean

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2020
Messages
22
I think lu81fitter has it. I've noticed the same thing. Some users sound perfectly clear and nearly like themselves (in real person or on analog); others, not so much. Most of the users use the Motorola lapel speaker-mic's. I'll observe how those that sound good use their mic's.
 

bobcrean

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2020
Messages
22
Could be the repeater is NOT set up correctly...........
R8000 says the repeater just passes the 1's and 0's on; I'm more than happy to talk to the repeater's owner about how it was set up if I knew for a fact that it could be part of the problem.
 

mikewazowski

Forums Manager/Global DB Admin
Staff member
Forums Manager
Joined
Jun 26, 2001
Messages
13,760
Location
Oot and Aboot
R8000 says the repeater just passes the 1's and 0's on; I'm more than happy to talk to the repeater's owner about how it was set up if I knew for a fact that it could be part of the problem.

Most digital repeaters clean up and reclock the digital signal before retransmitting it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top