Does DonS know if Pro-96 tracks P25 851.xxxx TRS ?

[Michael-SATX]

I am posting this here in the off chance Don Starr (DonS) lQQks at his CO home state Forum ?
I just know DonS will know if the Pro-96 using WIN96 can track this 851.xxxx P25 TRS system.
My Pro-106 does GREat and neither of my 2 Pro-96's will do it after trying tons of diff settings !

OK, here is what Pro96Com reports when sitting on the control channel of the LCRA-LiveOak-P25-TRS.

Site Activity:
Channel - frequency - * - usage
01-0026 - 851.3250 - c - control channel
01-0066 - 851.8250 - v - voice channel
01-0127 - 852-5875 - v - voice channel
01-0151 - 852.8875 - v - voice channel
01-0169 - 853-1125 - v - voice channel

Are these the correct WIN96 settings ?????
9600 Baud "Table" Setting"
Base Freq: 851.000
Offset:0
Site:12.5

Note: Tried 2 diff Pro-96's and neither track this P25 site with 99% CC decode present.
Reason: It must be an issue with the Pro-96's firmware NOT letting it track the 851.xxxx band ?
Got Milk ? or Got a Better reason that the Pro-96 can't do it ? even tried various Multi-Table settings
and yes I tried "9600 Normal" settings and NO NADA ! Now Calling DonS to the explanation rescue !

Bottom Line: I hope that DonS gets this "Message in a Bottle" .... Thank You So Much

 

[puzzleriddle]

yes it will track 800 re banded systems but you need to use the extended rebanded tables in win96 Win96 - The RadioReference Wiki, read & follow the pix at the bottom of this page. this can be ONLY with software and a programming cable

 

[puzzleriddle]

just extended tables then check moto 800/900 & the baud rate of the CC . sorry about double post just woke up.

 

[mikey60]

Michael,

Based on the values above, yes that does appear to be the correct tables for that system.

Use the "Multi-Tables" option under the 9600CC area, then select the 800 MHz option under the 9600CC area of the extended tables area to set the defaults. Then change the first line as follows:

Ch-Lo: 0
Ch-Hi: 65535
Offset: 0
Base: 851.0000
Step: 12.5


Mike

 

[greenthumb]

...moved to the software forum...

 

[Michael-SATX]

Here is the Pro96Com tower info text file !

-TowerInfo
#This section is here for information only. With the exception
#of the Call Sign(s), This data is not Read back into the program at all.
System ID : 200
System Name : Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) P25
WACN : 92571
Tower Number (Decimal): 11919
Tower Number (Hex) : T7713
Tower Description : (null)
Control Capabilities : Data,Voice,Registration
Call Sign(s) :
Timestamp : Wed Jun 27 17:42:26 2012

-Tables
#Format: Table ID,Base Freq,Spacing,Input Offset,Assumed/Confirmed,BandWidth,Slots
00,769.00625,0.01250,30.00000,"Confirmed",0.00625,1
01,851.00000,0.01250,-45.00000,"Confirmed",0.00625,1

-Frequencies
#Format: Channel,Usage,Frequency(/Slot),Input Channel,Input Frequency(/Slot),Input Explicit(1/0),Hit Count
"01-0026","c",851.32500,"01-0026",806.32500,0,0
"01-0066","cv",851.82500,"01-0066",806.82500,0,99
"01-0127","v",852.58750,"01-0127",807.58750,0,99
"01-0151","v",852.88750,"01-0151",807.88750,0,103
"01-0169","v",853.11250,"01-0169",808.11250,0,97

-Neighbors
#Format: TowerID,TowerIDHex,System ID,Channel,Frequency,Tower Name
10303,"T6703",200,"00-0016",769.20625,"New Braunfels"
10707,"T6B07",200,"00-0327",773.09375,"Kingsbury"
12001,"T7801",200,"00-0094",770.18125,"Unknown"

 

[redhelmet13]

I see 6.25khz (narrow) channel spacing in the tables section... Not sure if this is an issue though.

 

[Michael-SATX]

Redhelmet13, beats me if the channel spacing is an issue ?
Someone from Houston PM's me this "extended table" today.
He suggested I leave table #0 blank and enter these values for table #1.
Unfortunately, the Pro-96's stayed quiet, while the Pro-106 tracked the TRS GREat

0 0 0.00000 0 0.000
0 4095 851.00000 0 12.500
0 0 0.00000 0 0.000
0 0 0.00000 0 0.000
0 0 0.00000 0 0.000
0 0 0.00000 0 0.000

OK, I'm all ready for plan 79-B ... bring on the suggestions to try

 

[Michael-SATX]

Success It Works GREat ~ Case Closed thanks to Mikey60 !!!

So Mikey, if the CC broadcasts the 800 in the 2nd position or 'Table #1"

Then why wouldn't I leave table #0 blank and enter the values in Table #1 ?

But anyway, your WIN96 "Extended Table" below is what FIXED my issue !!!



4096 8191 851.00000 4096 12.500
65535 65535 0.00000 0 5.000
65535 65535 0.00000 0 5.000
65535 65535 0.00000 0 5.000
65535 65535 0.00000 0 5.000
65535 65535 0.00000 0 5.000



WOW ~ Guess What Mikey, he likes it, My Boy Pro-96 likes it ! It's working GREat )

I can't thank you and ALL your efforts enough ~ The Pro-96 is tracking the same as my Pro-106 !

This deserves a WIKI and or a sticky somewhere if it can be helpfull to others here in RR land !!!



Thanks a Million !!!

Michael-SATX