MMIC said:
By using ESK, EDACS can be secured from people on the outside programming radios onto the system - Motorola does not have a competing product or innovation.
That statement is not true.
Modern Motorola trunking systems support both the Advanced System Key which adds many security features to the subscriber radios, and an option to shuffle the control channels,
known as "shuffled bandplan", for use with compatible radios, which essentially will misdirect any "legacy" scanner to go to the wrong channel. A "shuffled bandplan" enabled radio will know where it's REALLY supposed to go, however.
Motorola's radios are physically superior and I've had my hands on many of the latest
and greatest from both companies, recently. Motorola will have custom parts made to
optimize performance, while M/A-Com is less willing to do that and will settle for parts
such as speakers and mic elements which are only fair, but they're off-the-shelf and
readily available.
Both companies have come up with some great ideas, but they've both pulled some real
boners, too.
From a programming perspective, M/A-Com wins. The codeplug for any given type of
radio is portable to any other kind of radio. (Some options will become inaccessible or
accessible depending on what changes.) Most of Moto's radios still take a quasi-unique
software package. There's only one software package for virtually all M/A-Com radios.
M/A-Com radios allow scanning of up to 50 talkgroups in a single scan list. Motorola
limits scanning of trunked talkgroups to just TEN.
The "tx inhibit" feature in the M/A-Com software actually WORKS, NO EXCEPTIONS.
"Tx inhibit" on Motorola means "Sometimes, or most of the time, if you're lucky. You
need extra skills to make your radio invisible to the system."
Elroy